Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 In my last email I said something which I wish to clarify: Regarding gathering information about how to use dashas and vargas: Firstly, it should be known that I somehow got absorbed in PROGRAMMING Jyotish more so than doing Jyotish, and more so than studying Jyotish, from DAY ONE of my experience with Jyotish. So I am not the fountain of knowledge regarding Jyotish. Now I did make it a point to buy all the books I could, all of them, for awhile I did that, then I stopped. In the process, which was a few years ago ending, by that time, I had acquired perhaps 200 books say. And as I acquired them, I was quickly or cursory reading them all. But very speedily just going through in a rough way usually to get an idea of what was in the book. That is not full study, that's for sure, but I do have an amazing ability to assimilate knowledge at a very high speed, moreso than most, so for me to glance through something means something. So anyway, as a knowledge gathering person, my style is to appreciate those items sometimes found which are "very good", like really complete reference books, or things which are just plain good, good in form, good in content, and so on. When it comes to Indian books and Classics, suddenly I'm lost. They are not "good" in the way I'm used to at all, for example, usually no word index in the back, usually bad ink, ghosted images on the pages, things torn, things crooked, unreadable even sometimes. Then there's the problems with this knowledge coming to the West, such as it's merging with Western Astrology, the two getting confused at conferences, in classes, in newer books, and egos, and organizations, qualifications, misunderstandings, you name it. So now, you cannot, with Indian books on Jyotish, think, "OK, which one is the dasha reference". Forget it. Doesn't exist it seems. The books are all variegated. Often they are very disorganized, or so it seems to me, but then I don't know Sanskrit rules or customs/cultures. There may be organization I'm just not seeing, or maybe that didn't/doesn't matter ultimately, which I think is true. I think that to be confident with Jyotish as some on this list are, I think one would need to really read alot of books, and really carefully listen to the verses. I have seen over and over that with Indian received knowledge, scriptural and more material, like Jyotish, that you really have to listen CAREFULLY to what's being said, as the subtle inferences may be just as important as what was actually said. Like for example, if something says "This is the King of Dashas", then that is different than if it said "This is the Queen of Dashas". That MAY BE a big thing, in this verses case. You don't know until you think it through at the very least, or possibly research it, or ask one more learned on the topic. So it takes time and energy to really study things which are from India at this point. The knowledge tends to come in a disorganized way, kindof haphazardly so it seems. I once asked around for a long time if anyone knew where to find descriptions of the Tithis, Yogas and Karans- what they mean/do or anything about them.... these are parts of the Panchang or calendar. I didn't hear anything back. Maybe there was nothing in English. Then I found some in Jataka Baranam, which came out more recently. So some things will appear gradually. There's alot still being brought over, from books, families and sampradayas, individuals, research. We're at an early point. My main point is this though: I think you can probably get confident with varga charts, and different dasha systems, if you read alot of books carefully, studying and practicing what is in them, but I haven't done that. I suppose others have, who are more confident than myself about these types of things. I have seen alot of knowledge in the books, but unfortunately... ....this one has a few good verses here... ....and this one here covers this, but it's not in the table of contents or index...(no index) ....and nobody knows what's in the books that you can just call and ask... ....the existing one or two computer lookup programs have like 12 of the 300 or so English books out... ....most of us don't read our Jyotish books much I fear... ....it is difficult reading... So, these are our times. We are not that good at this, most of us, and there are not very many, if any, who are really good at it, and the better they get, the harder they are to get ahold of and talk to... so the knowledge doesn't grow that fast either. It's hard to get it clear. And remember, those who can, do, and those who can't, teach. Ever wonder about ads that say: "Millionaire reveals secrets for only $49.99" or how about "Jyotishi with bad karma can solve your karmic problems, $150" I'm kidding around. For things we aim, are we to blame? How fragile we are. Peace out, Raghu Goravani 2852 Willamette St # 353 Eugene OR USA 97405 or Fax: 541-343-0344 "Goravani Jyotish" Vedic/Hindu Astrology Software Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 27, 2001 Report Share Posted March 27, 2001 Das Goravani schrieb: > > In my last email I said something which I wish to clarify: Dear Raghu, YOU SAID IT!!!! I love ya! The time has come, as the walrus might have said, to have an unprejudiced look at things and evaluate our heritage: collect what is useful, put the rest in a box for later times, if we have the luck to understand them better! Trying to "integrate" everything is folly: some may be just junk! There are two different original sources for Indian astrology: the Atlantean and the Lemurian. Jaimini was Lemurian and agasthya too perhaps. The South Indian chart is clockwise, devised by astrologers south of the equator.One of the oldest "folk songs" of the south is nostalgic and says that India was not their true homeland, but a land far away to the south, with red and green hills etc. During the "classical" age - 500 BC till 800 AD - all Tamil literature was translated into sanskrit. Jaimini wrote in Tamil. I have not (yet) found a good source for the original names of signs, but the southern names have nothing to do with aries (mesha), Taurus(Vrishabha) etc. The SI names are like "lyre", "well" etc. If we try to read the northern and southern books together we can make a lot of mistakes. But today we don´t know which is which! regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.