Guest guest Posted February 20, 2001 Report Share Posted February 20, 2001 >From Astrologia Vedica: http://www.mantra-ebooks.com/3dollar.html Typical places represented by Leo are deep forests/jungles, especially ones where lions roam. Others are forts, palaces, throne rooms, governmental buildings, hospitals, places where electricity is generated, where glass is manufactured, where gold is stored and where medicines are produced. Just to give an idea of how the ancient dictums can be applied to modern life, the following is instructive. When the author was a child, the major planetary period of Jupiter operated practically throughout. ( Planetary periods will be dealt with later ). Jupiter was in Leo. The childhood was spent at the edge of a large metropolitan city where there was a large, wooded area nearby, several miles square. So although the author did not spend his childhood in a jungle or deep forest where tigers and lions roamed, he did actually spend his youthful days playing in the middle of a forest. Dharmapada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 21, 2001 Report Share Posted February 21, 2001 Dharmapada, Thanks for sharing that. I am Leo Ascendant as well with Sun in Leo. I grew in Ohio with woods behind my house. I spent every moment I could back there. I had tree houses, caught frogs and Salamanders, and had a great time. Although I had friends that I spent time with in the woods, I also spent many solitary hours at a young age and didn't mind it a bit. I also loved the old Tarzan movies with Johnny Weismuller. I would some times pretend I was Tarzan when I was swinging on vines in the woods. I love this discovery aspect of Vedic Astrology. Once again thanks for sharing this. Hare Krishna, Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2001 Report Share Posted February 23, 2001 Dean De Lucia wrote: > >From Astrologia Vedica: > > http://www.mantra-ebooks.com/3dollar.html > > Typical places represented by Leo are deep forests/jungles, especially ones > where lions roam. Sorry, but lions do not roam or live in forests or jungles: their habitat is grassland and semi-desert areas where trees are few. In other words wide open spaces with unobstructed view over a long range. Their tawny colour is a camouflage suited for "bare earth" where they love to lie in the sun. Only tigers live in jungles. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2001 Report Share Posted February 23, 2001 Hello, There is type of lion called the mountain lion who lives in forests and mountains. In fact this is his favorite place, although he also lives in deserts. He roams from North America down to South America. Farther in the south, in such places as Central and South America he lives in jungles. Kind Regards Cat Fan Alex J gjlist, subra@t... wrote: > Dean De Lucia wrote: > > >From Astrologia Vedica: > > > > http://www.mantra-ebooks.com/3dollar.html > > > > Typical places represented by Leo are deep forests/jungles, especially ones > > where lions roam. > > Sorry, but lions do not roam or live in forests or jungles: their habitat is > grassland and semi-desert areas where trees are few. In other words wide open > spaces with unobstructed view over a long range. Their tawny colour is a > camouflage suited for "bare earth" where they love to lie in the sun. Only > tigers live in jungles. > > regards > Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 23, 2001 Report Share Posted February 23, 2001 Mani, I think that as far as most people understand lion you are correct, but Astrology is global and applies to the whole face of the earth. The Bible talks about lions in Palestine and we had Mountain Lions in Colorado. What is important is the archetype and pumas, jaguars, tigers, and other kinds of big cats love to roam forests and jungles. It's the archetype that is important and not specifically the African Lion. Namaste Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2001 Report Share Posted February 24, 2001 Dear Jeffrey and cat fan Alex, > Mani, > I think that as far as most people understand lion you are correct, > but Astrology is global and applies to the whole face of the earth. The > Bible talks about lions in Palestine and we had Mountain Lions in > Colorado. What is important is the archetype and pumas, jaguars, tigers, > and other kinds of big cats love to roam forests and jungles. It's the > archetype that is important and not specifically the African Lion. I was not picking holes in jyothish, but wanted to say that we should not artificially derive the qualities of the signs from their names. Even in India the original Tamil names for zodiacal signs were very different from those in use today in jyothish and in western astrology. If Leo is associated with forests and woods, fine! But NOT because of the name Leo, or any leonine habits. Certain associations and characteristics may tally with the sign names, but we should not overdo this. Cancer people don´t live in holes or Pisces in water. The palestinian lion was an African/Indian lion, the true maned (male)type. The mountain lion also could belong to this group. They all prefer bare areas. Palestina was far from being wooded, wood had to be imported from Lebanon etc. The life-style of the true lion is very different from that of the other "cats". The lion is not very catty. If one pursues the "archetypal" nature of lions, there are qualities in common with Leo - but these are the characteristics which make the lion "regal" and different from the other cats. One may take he following as typical of lions: - lions don´t hide themselves and are far less stealthy than the other cats, often attack from the front. - they live like kings, have harems, like to keep the family together and rule over it. - they generally hold their heads high and have a majestic manner of movement, "monarch of all I survey" attitude. Nevertheless I think one should just accept the characteristics of signs as given in the texts, not try to derive any from the names. regards Mani - Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2001 Report Share Posted February 24, 2001 mani, I wish to respectufully disagree with you- I think that the aualities of the signs correspond well with the symbols of the signs. Leo is a case in point. Even the nature of the " frontal attacks "( Behari ) of the Leo ascendent correspond so well to the animal symbol. By the way, other cats are cats, while lions are related to the dog family. Most of the other cats are very similar to each other, they are more sly, while lions are much more straightforward in their bearing. Cancer, too, corresponds to the animal symbol. I was born with Cancer on the horizon, with the sun in Cancer. I was born in a naval hospital on the sandy banks of a river. The sandy nature of the environment corresponds perfectly to Cancer, the the fact that the Navy was involved corresponds to the planet of government in a watery sign. In prasna asstrology, the symbolism of the signs mysteriously stands out repeatedly. In many ways the Cancer personality corresponds to the symbol. The cancer personality is timid, indirect, tends to hide away from the mainstream- it seeks an environment which is not his native one and hide away there. There is a high degree of correspondence between the symbols of signs and the manifestations, with all due consideration to planetary placements. I just have to disagree with you. Dharmapada Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2001 Report Share Posted February 24, 2001 Mani, Correction accepted. I was trying to make to much out of the correlation between the forest/jungle and the symbol of the Lion. Parashara say's, "Simh is ruled by Surya and is Sattvic. It is a quadruped rashi and a royal rashi. It resorts to forests and rises with its head. It has a large, white body. It resides in the east and is strong during the daytime." I have always been attracted to and felt my best when living in forests and jungles, although I feel my best living in or near forests. I presently live in Ashland, Oregon where there are abundant forests. Thanks for the correction! Jeff Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2001 Report Share Posted February 24, 2001 OM AMRTESVARYAI NAMAH will whoever is supposed to handle this me? thank you. {su} --- Jeffrey P Pummill <ayurjyotish wrote: > Mani, > Correction accepted. I was trying to make to > much out of the > correlation between the forest/jungle and the symbol > of the Lion. > Parashara say's, "Simh is ruled by Surya and is > Sattvic. It is a > quadruped rashi and a royal rashi. It resorts to > forests and rises with > its head. It has a large, white body. It resides in > the east and is > strong during the daytime." I have always been > attracted to and felt my > best when living in forests and jungles, although I > feel my best living > in or near forests. I presently live in Ashland, > Oregon where there are > abundant forests. Thanks for the correction! Jeff > > > gjlist- > > > > Your use of is subject to > > > Get email at your own domain with Mail. http://personal.mail./ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted February 24, 2001 Report Share Posted February 24, 2001 Dear Dean and Jeffery, Thanks for responses. > Leo is a case in point. > Even the nature of the " frontal attacks "( Behari ) of the Leo ascendent > correspond so well to the animal symbol. > > By the way, other cats are cats, while lions are related to the dog family. > Most of the other cats are very similar to each other, they are more sly, > while lions are much more straightforward in their bearing. This is exactly what I was getting at: lions are like dogs! Unless provoked by a hunter, mostly human, the "cats" never attack from the front, fall on their prey from behind. The Bengal tiger is a man-eater. Its hunting methods are entirely sly and surreptitious and even on a boat in the river one is not safe: they swim silently and only the paw comes out to grab the victim. Others in the boat just see a comrade disappearing suddenly! To prevent this they often wear masks on the back, with faces and arms painted as if their backs were their front! The lion is open, creeps towards the grazing herd, or feigns lack of interest and gets close to it non-chalantly. BUT: When close enough it attacks openly, the weakest in the herd gets caught. It is almost as if the lion gives its prey "a fair chance" - and if the prey is a bit faster the lion just gives up "magnanimously". This is very typical of leo ascendant or rasi persons: they prefer to fight openly, but give up when the effort seems to be unwarranted, and are often "surprised" by their lack of success, which they think is their due! Lions kill only to eat, about once a week. Catty cats often kill wantonly, which applies to the domestic cat too: they hunt mice even if regularly fed with cat-food. A well-fed lion never thinks of hunting. Lions can be tamed like dogs, but the other cats are individualists. Lions are "noble" in behaviour, but can also be ruthless and brutal. Whenever a lion takes over a harem, it systematically kills the young offspring of the previous ruler. This is reflected in all royal dynasties and ceased only where the monarchy was changed from absolute to constitutional. History is full of kings who got rid of all the children of previous rulers, even own brothers were often eliminated! > > Cancer, too, corresponds to the animal symbol. I was born with Cancer on the > horizon, with the sun in Cancer. I was born in a naval hospital on the sandy > banks > of a river. The sandy nature of the environment corresponds perfectly to > Cancer, the the fact that the Navy was involved corresponds to the planet of > government in a watery sign. In prasna asstrology, the symbolism of the > signs mysteriously stands out repeatedly. > In many ways the Cancer personality corresponds to the symbol. The cancer > personality is timid, indirect, tends to hide away from the mainstream- it > seeks an environment which is not his native one and hide away there. Very nicely defined. But the nature is not because of "crab" but can apply to crabs. Actually the nature of the signs is better defined by their rulerships. Leo is an expression of the Sun as giver of life and sustainer of all vegetation. Cancer is ruled by the moon, which has power only during the night and that too limited by its phases. It is the "sun" of darkness, but its powers are limited. It is a sign of striving for power, but not of success in the effort. And when frustrated, the rage of Cancer is devastating! In western astrology Gemini is a sign of duality, "double personality" etc. but in jyothish it is a sign of uniting forces, partnership! Virgo women don´t go through life with chastity belts. Scorpio is a watery sign but scorpions live in dark and DRY plaes. Aquarius is "airy" although its name is associated with water. Sagittarius people are not all horsey or interested in shooting at people. Aries people are not just "ram-like" but are usually pioneers who dare. Taurus is not "bull-headed" or stubborn, but more cow, loving and tolerating. Capricorn is not goaty or watery, although the symbol is a goat with the tail of the fish. Libra does not give more sense of justice than the other signs. In fact all the attempts to read character from signs is a very western approach, trying to find explanations for the otherwise inexplicable! The lapidary statements as to what sign "governs" what features is either empirical or revealed knowledge, not derived! The associations given are essentially for prasna purposes, not for judging character or preferences. Health or success may be found in appropriate places, but it does not mean the person likes such places or has even the opportunity to be there! Dear Dean, you were born with cancer lagna and with sun in cancer, in a sandy riverine area in a naval hospital. Did all the children born there have cancer as lagna, moon or sun-sign? How about the millions of true cancer types born in the middle of continents, in places far from water and sand? I know people who are very cancerian, but love the mountains and never think of even spending a holiday in watery or sandy places! In other words, one swallow does not make the summer. Generalizations are not valid and interpretations of symbols has to be very carefully considered. the symbolism is very subtle and not what strikes the eye. Cosmic influences were not tailored to suit a lion or crab or fish or scorpion: these creatures were drawn in because they exhibited certain - BUT NOT ALL - characteristics associated with the cosmic divisions. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.