Guest guest Posted January 19, 2001 Report Share Posted January 19, 2001 Dear Andrew <<The ancient astrologer had to erect charts by hand which took considerable skill and time. We are lucky in the fact we have computers and access to tremendous amounts of birth data and events that can be verified. This puts us at a big advantage and we should endevour to put up new ideas and concepts for scrutiny without fear of being ridiculed or attacked. We must not become "fundamentalist astrologers" who attack anybody whose views differ from ours or the ancient texts. I think conservative thinking in some areas of Vedic astrology has led to a denial of the outer planets and their usefulness in interpreting a chart also. In the ancient texts there was no mention of electricity, computers or aeroplanes but none of us would deny their use or effectiveness. Having never been a western astrologer I have no interest in hijacking any part of Vedic astrology or adding parts of one system to the other, but the effects of the outer planets are one thing I think we all should look at more carefully. I have already mentioned in other postings my thoughts about Uranus being the planet of astrology and the third eye chakra and Neptune relating to mystics and the crown chakra. This is very evident if you look at the charts of people like Yogaswami, Gurudeva and the Dalai Lama. The very position of their Neptune in particular would indicate it's importance. I'm not suggesting you can't do a reading without these planets but you either ignore them or try to interpret them and I prefer to look at them objectively. My old teacher has decades of experience in astrology and is a very traditional Hindu. He insists the outer planets are very important and should never be ignored. He came to this conclusion after observing their effects over many years simply by seeing them in charts. I would think we should all embrace his open mindedness as well. As a last comment on the nodes it would seem there has always been two camps with some saying they are "shadow" grahas and therefore cannot cast aspects and others who think they cast a trine aspect. My advice to everybody is to find out yourself which is right.>> I agree with you in almost evrything you mention in this quotation. One of my jyotish gurus is very old and have lived in caves in the Himalayas for many years in austerities, meditation & devotion to the Lord. Before i met him about 7 years ago & too was not taking the outer planets into consideration "cos they are not mentioned in the books on vedic astrology that so far i had read". Once i saw his talents, i did not argue with him, i just followed. He was amused by my fundamentalist attitude towards certain areas & he destroyed that illusion. He was amused as well by the fact that people in the West pay to be frightened (horror movies, amusement ? places). He told me that he can frighten people for free. Regarding the outer planets he told me that they are very important and he gave me examples of their influence in transits over natal planets and on whole generations. Once i studied his guidance it made a lot of sense to me. We know that we only have in Engish about 1% of the books ever written about vedic astrology, i will not be surprised if in the near future we find vedic astrology books giving the importance of the outer planets. BTW, he is in his 90's now and he is more fit than me both physical or mental. I am just waiting for the next conjunction of mars with Pluto in a few weeks time to confirm certain of my observations. Also, this year Uranus will go into Aquarius for few months before going retro into Capricorn but later on it will transit its own sign for many years. Then, when Uranus is in Pisces and Neptune is in Aquarius, i guess that they will make a kind of Parivarthana yoga. Also, we have Pluto in Scorpio now but going into Sagittarius in about 5 years time. Pluto is the residence of Lord Yamaraj, the superintendent of death just like Osiris in Egypt. In India, Yamaraj is known as the lord of Yama (death) but also as Dharmaraj, lord of dharma (virtue, duty, religion). In traditional astrology, Scorpio is the sign of death (the 8th sign) and Sagittarius is the sign of dharma (9th house/sign). In traditional astrology, Scorpio is the sign of Pluto. So we can say that Pluto in Scorpio is strong enough to bring drastic changes into humanity by destroying mental conditionmenst and habits. Also, we can say that Pluto in transit from Scorpio into Sagittarius, suffers a transformation (Pluto is the planet of transformation) and from being Yamaraja becomes Dharmaraja. I ask myself if Pluto in Sagittarius is going to clean up the corruption in present religions. And Egyptians used to consider the passage of the soul across the Milky Way, between Scorpio & Sagittarius. Also, now that we can talk about the outer planets, i am observing the association of Saturn and jupiter in Taurus opposite to Pluto. This configuration does not happen in the past 2000 years & i feel that it is very important. To me what is happening in America, the present most powerful nation on earth, is related mainly to this unique configuration which we are not going to see for perhaps another 2 or 3,000 years from now. Then we have the last conjunction of Jupiter and Saturn in Aries (May 2000) which we will not see it again for another 800 or 900 years. We as astrologers are supposed to study the sky for planetary configurations and to give guidance to people in general. If the medicine works, who cares for the rules? Jesus Christ was condemned for healing on Saturdays but he did not care. I love to use my intuition. BTW, i use the mean Rahu as instructed by the great Parasara but everyone is free to learn by their mistakes. Best wishes Natabara Das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2001 Report Share Posted January 19, 2001 natabara wrote: > Dear Andrew > > Also, now that we can talk about the outer planets, i am observing the > association of Saturn and jupiter in Taurus opposite to Pluto. This > configuration does not happen in the past 2000 years & i feel that it is > very important. To me what is happening in America, the present most > powerful nation on earth, is related mainly to this unique configuration > which we are not going to see for perhaps another 2 or 3,000 years from now. Dear Natabara, amigo, I too am reluctant to neglect the "outers" - a wrong term, for Mars, jupiter and saturn are outers by astronomy! "Outer outers" would be better, but the term "trans.saturnian" TS would suit best. The conjunction of jupiter and saturn was in aries 28/29, whereas pluto was in scorpio 21/22. No opposition. The boad quincunx is weak. The effect should be studied, bur I do not think that any concrete conclusions can be arrived at: both planets retrograded and become direct, one in aries, the other in taurus! IMHO the TS planets influence the whole world and overall trends, but affect individuals and selected nations only if there are planets or angles closely conjunct, at least less than 5 degrees. Even then, only Sun, Moon, Mercury. venus and perhaps Mars (but certainly less) in "exact" aspect to the TS planets are of individual interest, jupiter and saturn not at all: their effects can only be global and apply to millions and millions! Integrating TS planets into the jyothish frame is welcome: the present era has reached a stage when their influences can be felt. But it has to be done very very gently and carefully! Western astrologers have considered the TS planets for quite some time, BUT THEIR INTERPRETATION IS MOSTLY BS! Firebrace, my western sidereal "guru", said: Pluto is important only if the orb is within 1 degree; all aspects except conjunctions are weak!. He guided Winston Churchill astrologically to success during the war and warned him against his later loss of position. WC did not take heed, remained "imperialistic" - failed to follow the trends of the TS planets - and became a political relique! The question is always: am I adding to knowledge or refuting what was taught? Refuting is also legitimate, if one does so with enough evidence. What applied once may not apply today! regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 19, 2001 Report Share Posted January 19, 2001 Dear Natabara, and everyone. Outer planets do affect us- and that's the fact. I do share your opinion Natabara- why should we deprive ourselves from recognizing that which has been proven so convincingly. Even than, there is always something "transcendental" in every chart-and life, that defies prediction. (bodies not yet known, forces not yet registered,etc).. We all have to take that into account- and talk about possibities, rather than certainties.. having that in mind- I cannot understand the reason why we should exclude things that we KNOW exist, and are rather powerful... There are already so many things that we don't know about anything, or not enugh. We've seen the interest on the list for Roberts post on MB points- and OUTER plannets are even longer researched...and we know quite a lot about them. Das? I've read your post on the Internet and I can feel your disagreement? Regards, Anna Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2001 Report Share Posted January 20, 2001 Hi Donna, The fact that outer planets are "generational" -due to their slow motion, and undoubtedly important for world events, doesn't make them less powerful in a personal chart-life- just look at the charts having them prominent (Gaugelin zone/ angular placement), or with lots of contacts- you'll see that yourself. Anna - Donna M gjlist Saturday, January 20, 2001 7:07 PM Re: [gjlist] OUTER PLANETS I have always thought that the outer planets were more for long term movements and changes in humanity as a whole. And related to the individual in the way that they fit into those changes. Does anyone else see this this way. What are everyone else's thoughts on this? donna Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. gjlist- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted January 20, 2001 Report Share Posted January 20, 2001 I have always thought that the outer planets were more for long term movements and changes in humanity as a whole. And related to the individual in the way that they fit into those changes. Does anyone else see this this way. What are everyone else's thoughts on this? donna Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.