Guest guest Posted December 11, 2000 Report Share Posted December 11, 2000 Dear Dale, Raising a controversial topic 'onlist' is something akin to being thrown into a pit of rattlers...ha ha. I am not about to bite you, as I have often thought about these idiosyncracies or Great Mysteries, in the course of my work. It would be nice to have definitive 'answers', but one size does not fit all, and I am still fumbling with the 'evidence' of my personal observations. Lately I have been reading Rudolf Steiner, a student of Goethe, and discussing his philosophies with interested parties. Here is a quote that further confused me..."Steiner definitly favoured decimal homeopathy as he favoured the freedom of the individual. The choices are c:centicimal and m:milenial. I know that the "m" range are for very competant homeopaths only. I think this may relate to the etheric, astral, ego. Ego where the therapist takes responsibility for the remedy". ...eeecckkk!! Way out of my league, I'll leave that to the Masters!. When my brain starts to drain over these matters, I remind myself that the Lord moves in mysterious ways, wonders to perform... Warm Regards, Ann. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2000 Report Share Posted December 11, 2000 Dear Ann, I appreciate your thoughts, and have no intention of trying to explain my thoughts on this topic. I like to remain a a low-key member of the list. You are most welcomed to your thoughts and reasons. I only wish to remind you that most of us have started to learn Astrology so that we can understand our future. Once the events of future do not match with the Astrology, then there is no need to study Astrology. I have seen people fall into traps and circumstances to attract certain events in their lives. I am not a bit interested in philosophy, therefore I will prefer not to continue on with this discussion. I have no idea, if you ever studied the charts of these so called sex offenders. Whether the charts showed any change or not. Unless these are checked and analyzed, there is no need to discuss this any further. There are children born with certain handicaps, diformities in the limbs, Paralysis and other serious ailments, and many of these can be classified as FIXED type of diseases, which can not be corrected. We may find ways to solutions to help in this, but the condition remains. Then there are other type of afflictions like alcoholism, drugs and sex offences, and in majority of cases these can be classified as changeable, BUT THE ASTROLOGICAL CHART WILL SHOW WHEN THE CHANGE will take place. Please re-read my original email, which clearly indicates that there are two types of afflictions, and of these one type of afflictions can be changed. For the other type, we are to learn to live with them. We can not change these as they are related to past KARMA. As for a controversial topic, I am not interested in any kind of arguments, but am willing to discuss anything with learned people. Please analyze the charts of these sex offenders (before the offences and after the remedieal measures) and see if the changes are indicated in their charts. Then we will be in a better situation to discuss this matter. Best wishes, Dale Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2000 Report Share Posted December 12, 2000 Ann Murphy wrote: > > Lately I have been reading Rudolf Steiner, a student of Goethe, and > discussing his philosophies with interested parties. Here is a quote that > further confused me..."Steiner definitly favoured decimal homeopathy as he > favoured the freedom of the individual. The choices are c:centicimal and > m:milenial. I know that the "m" range are for very competant homeopaths > only. I think this may relate to the etheric, astral, ego. Ego where the > therapist takes responsibility for the remedy". > ...eeecckkk!! Way out of my league, I'll leave that to the Masters!. > When my brain starts to drain over these matters, I remind myself that > the Lord moves in mysterious ways, wonders to perform... Dear Ann, R. Steiner had a talent for expressing himself in a manner that was extremely tough to understand. I don´t think most people who heard his lectures ever understood him, but luckily they were printed and could be chewed at leisure (like cud, over and over again) until meaning came through! Unfortunately Anthroposophists often imitate him, one often wonders if they themselves understand what they say. I (we) say they are "verSteinert" = petrified. Not only God, but Anthropologists also move in mysterious ways....... It is easier to follow Steiner if one remembers that he was essentially a Theosophist who centred the philosophy around The Holy Trinity, with Christ at the centre as the "approachable God", laying emphasis on the individuality of each human being and its direct communication with Christ. Very much like what Sri Aurobindo taught. Both at the same time also emphasized the "mystery" aspect of this communication. This was because both taught during the years of increasing materialism and the tendency to find "scientific" explanations for all miracles or denying them. Hope this helps in future talks. As astrologer I think he went only by aspects and houses rather than signs, and was a tropicalist. Not sure. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2000 Report Share Posted December 12, 2000 In a message dated 12/11/2000 10:55:54 PM Eastern Standard Time, evie writes: << "Steiner definitly favoured decimal homeopathy as he favoured the freedom of the individual. The choices are c:centicimal and m:milenial. I know that the "m" range are for very competant homeopaths only. I think this may relate to the etheric, astral, ego. Ego where the therapist takes responsibility for the remedy". >> Dear Ann, Today a lot of legal jargon has been rewritten so that it is understandable by human beings duly educated, but it looks as if the above words were not translated for general reading. The paragraph quoted above could indicate: 1) the writer did not understand the Steiner material very well, or 2) lacked ability to clearly describe it for his audience, or 3) Steiner categorizes individuals using an abstract decimal system mixed up with a binary label (either "c" or 'm"), or 4) not only Steiner, but the writer is uninterested in his readers' comprehension of his ideas, or 5) the above quotation is too short to bring out major ideas. Personally, my impression is that all of the above apply! ("Don't sweat it" is a good idea.) Best wishes, Carol Hook Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 13, 2000 Report Share Posted December 13, 2000 Hi! To those who may concern themselves with medical astrology etc.: Carolhook wrote: ....... > > << "Steiner definitly favoured decimal homeopathy as he > favoured the freedom of the individual. The choices are c:centicimal and > m:milenial. I know that the "m" range are for very competant homeopaths > only. I think this may relate to the etheric, astral, ego. Ego where the > therapist takes responsibility for the remedy". >> > 1) the writer did not understand the Steiner material very well, or > 2) lacked ability to clearly describe it for his audience, or > 3) Steiner categorizes individuals using an abstract decimal system mixed up > with a binary label (either "c" or 'm"), or > 4) not only Steiner, but the writer is uninterested in his readers' > comprehension of his ideas, or > 5) the above quotation is too short to bring out major ideas. > > Personally, my impression is that all of the above apply! ("Don't sweat it" > is a good idea.) Carol is right in all points, except that Steiner was certainly interested in his readers´and listeners´comprehension, but was poor at expressing his thoughts. As to the above qutation, the person quoting did not understand Steiner - or homoeopathy. Nor the fact that Steiner´s anthroposophical medical system is akin to homoeopathy, NOT identical! Natural medicine is to give a patient something available in nature to help the patient´s body (including brain!) to fight against a poison, or as support to increase its resistance, or supplement/provide what it lacks. Ayurveda started converting and synthesizingh, as well as extracting from natural substances, to create medicines, allopathy has gone the whole hog. In all these methods a certain meauraby appreciable quantity of the medicine is given. Homoeopathy works differently: it is essentially only a "message", uses essentially poisonous substances. A poison is chosen, which if taken by a healthy person produces the same or similar symptoms as the patient has. Say a person has itchy patches on the skin like one gets by rubbing against nestle. A minute quantity of this poison - an extract of nestle leaves - is given to the patient to say to the body: You are getting nestle, fight against it! In doing so the body gets rid of whatever had been the actual cause. This minute quantity, being a message, depends on a "vibration" principle and has to be made according to rules developed by Hannemann. The dilution is made by mixing the original poison in a liquid or solid solvent (powder) in the proportion original to Mixture = 1:10 (Decimal); OR 1:100 (Centesimal); OR 1:50000 (LM). and shaken in a particular manner a certain number of times.The mixture is again and again diluted in the same way. 1000 c.c of D3 has only 1 c.c. of the original, D6 has only a millionth part, D25 less than 1 molecule of the original. In a lab D 30 will be proved to be free of all traces of the original, chemically. The same happens to C 15 or LM 8. The usual practice is to use the lower dilutions till D3 or so for acute conditions, D6 for less acute etc. For chronic things D30 is preferred. For a fundamental change of constitution D200. Others do the same, usung the C or LM dilutions. The idea seems to be that the low dilutions speak to the body directly, the next higher to the sub-conscious to work on the body and the highest to the psyche. Why Steiner should attach individuality to the D dilutions is a mystery, probably a misunderstanding. Did he?...... Homoeopathy is "provocative". But a homoeopath also uses strengthening medicines in the usual way, in appreciable quantities, NOT diluted as above. Steiner, however, used the latter, ALSO diluted as above. If a child does not show proportional growth, Tobacco D6 is given, for the tobacco plant has "harmonious" proportions (in steiner´s view): telling the body to grow harmoniously! This is exaggerated to the extent that even such substances like calcium, much required by a pregnant woman, is given in this minute quantity, as happened to my wife. The child showed acute calcium deficiency!!! Actually none of three dilutions is correct. I have found the right method, but cannot get anyone to put it into practice, for the medical laws stand in the way. I WOULD BE GRATEFUL FOR ADDRESSES OF WELL_KNOWN HOMOEOPATHS WITH WHOM I COULD CORRESPOND RE. MY METHOD! At present H. cures take so long one wonders if the patient will live long enough to be cured! But my way will speed it up enormously. MEDICAL ASTROLOGY: If one finds out which substances used in homoeopathy are ruled by which planet, it will be a great step forward! Hope this helps Ann and others. regards Mani Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.