Baby's time of birth

[Guest guest]

If at all possible, I would wait. If not, then that's different.

 

Non-interference is more auspicious overall, in general.

 

Sri Caitanya was a 13 month pregnancy (historical fact)

 

There is more peace in serving, letting go, ultimately.

 

Birthtime is not to be messed with, if at all possible.

 

But if life is threatened, and doctors do know alot and have to be

listened to also, so then that is different.

 

If without too much trouble or over-endevour, if the child can be

allowed to come out in it's natural pace, that will be better for long

term for child and you both- as that's how relationships should work-

each person at their own pace and the others able to understand and

give- and the start of all things are important in setting the stage.

 

Good luck,

 

Das Goravani

 

 

 

 

 

 

2852 Willamette St # 353

Eugene OR USA 97405

 

or

Fax: 541-343-0344

 

"Goravani Jyotish"

Vedic/Hindu Astrology Software

[Guest guest]

If astrology is based on premises that are ruled by some cosmic and divine

law, then the doctor will be led by the Intelligence that governs our lives

to that moment which will truly represent the karma of the child to come.

 

Otherwise, it is all kind of meaningless, isn't it? Karma cannot be changed

by birthmoment, but the birth moment must reflect the individual's karma or

karmic destiny.

 

 

 

 

 

>Gautam Sarkar <gsarkar

>gjlist

>vedic astrology , gjlist

>[gjlist] Baby's time of birth

>Mon, 24 Jul 2000 10:39:51 -0700

>

>OM GAM

>Dear Jyotishis,

>I have a personal question that I am seeking an answer. My wife and I

>are expecting a baby (her first) and he is late by almost a week. The

>doctor is advising to induce labour purely to avoid the waiting. What is

>the astrological significance to this action? Will his time of birth be

>lost forever if we allow this? Or is his tob is still going to remain

>valid? What is your opinion?

>Thanks for the help.

>Gautam Sarkar

>

>

>

>

 

______________________

Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

[Guest guest]

Manas wrote:

 

If astrology is based on premises that are ruled by some cosmic and

divine

law, then the doctor will be led by the Intelligence that governs our

lives

to that moment which will truly represent the karma of the child to come.

 

Otherwise, it is all kind of meaningless, isn't it? Karma cannot be

changed

by birthmoment, but the birth moment must reflect the individual's karma

or

karmic destiny.

 

---------------

 

However, we still have to make decisions, for example, whether to wait

sometimes or not, whether to allow C-Section or not, whether to take the

birth control pill or not, and so many questions on and on. To say that

we "leave it all to fate" is ignoring half of reality.

 

In picking times for beginning important works, we are showing our

natures, our wishes, and so on, which will never go away. This is the

message of the Gita. Arjuna had to decide, though Krishna said that he

had already decided everything. That is the nature of reality. It is

neither wholly one or separate- it is both- there is oneness, and

individuality, both, eternally.

 

What you say Manas is true, but half the truth.

 

In choosing, people can use rules and things they've learned from

scripture and other authorities. Some inclinations are more conducive to

auspiciousness and others are less. For example, choosing vegetarianism

is better than choosing to eat meat. Choosing to keep a human baby is

more auspicious than abortion. So we have to try, but we cannot always

do things correctly, and we make compromises.

 

In the end, the Divine Will is there in all things that actually happen.

However, we still have to try for certain ends, that's our part of the deal.

 

 

Das Goravani

 

 

 

 

 

 

2852 Willamette St # 353

Eugene OR USA 97405

 

or

Fax: 541-343-0344

 

"Goravani Jyotish"

Vedic/Hindu Astrology Software