Guest guest Posted June 26, 2000 Report Share Posted June 26, 2000 Namaste, You don't even know you're doing it, do you Das? A beautiful blonde woman can't be a Vedic Astrologer???. But Sanjay, you should be aware of the nuances of chart interpretation when dealing with Female Horoscopy. Your article concerning dharma and marriage was not complete. As Parasara forebode, in these times of Kali Yuga our fingers are fat and our subtleties coarse. Please feel free to use my birth details in your comparison studies as I carry a good many of the astral characteristics you so aptly ascribe to Parasara to draw your conclusions.(Dec 8th 1958 @ 1.00am Mildura Victoria, Australia (34S12 142E09). I have been thinking about and been thrown into the Fourth House energy of Character,Morals,Home,Mother,Earth,Us...and looked again at my Arudha Lagna,4th from it and D4. The D4 especially sat me to wonder how to interpret Sun in Taurus Lagna, Venus and Mercury in 4th house Leo. If I were looking at this chart as of a stranger, I would probably be misled into thinking the person needed to be surrounded by lavish material beauty.I admit I believe there should be no uglyness in the home,it is a place of rest and safety... And I have gone to the point as to place leaves inside an otherwise drab dwelling; so I suppose I seem to contradict myself. I'm just musing over lifes' interludes and the golden web of knowledge Astrology permits. May the Blessings of Ganesh be upon you, Ann. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2000 Report Share Posted June 26, 2000 In a message dated 6/26/00 1:49:01 PM Eastern Daylight Time, writes: << This fashion moves around, to different "looks", and the slaves of fashion chase these moving standards, and are thus not helpful in spreading the culture of truth. >> Ah, Das, it is shallow! However, you must be a difficult father for your two teenagers. Not even adults can handle all these reminders of our shallowness. Lalia...who is waiting to be "in fashion" again! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted June 26, 2000 Report Share Posted June 26, 2000 Hi Ann, My comment about the woman being blonde was not to say that a blonde haired person can't be an astrolger, but rather, was simply to marvel at the repeating patterns. The woman in question was a previous Western Astrologer, and she had left the science saying it was bogus. She was dressed in a standard "pretty" way on the show, and her role was to be the debunker, and her persona was shallow and her points materialistic. In other words, she was playing into the hands of common illusion. She may not have been a real blonde, as many are not. The desire to "be blonde" these days is to play into current fashion. The standards which life itself sets are then ignored at that point in favor of chasing recognition for being a sexually attractive person. This mood, which is rampant these days, is not helpful in the spread of spiritual science amongst ourselves. That person is not helping by subscribing to those material vision based syndromes. So it's the to worship of the blonde woman that I was speaking, not any particular blonde woman, nor the color itself. If she were "ugly" by common standards, then it would change her prospects in society. This fashion moves around, to different "looks", and the slaves of fashion chase these moving standards, and are thus not helpful in spreading the culture of truth. Das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.