Guest guest Posted September 1, 2005 Report Share Posted September 1, 2005 Here's a case study: A man in dire straits meets an Indian Guru who initiates him and gives him a spiritual name. He then advises him to go stay with him in India. The man gets to India only to find that his Guru is gone to stay in the west. So he stays with the (senior) Guru bhai of his Guru who gives shelter. The Gurubhai tells the man that he received letters from the Guru that the man should stay with him to learn. So the Gurubhai becomes the new Guru of the man and even reinitiates him. Many years pass in this way. Finally the man finds out that his original Guru is angry at the Guru Bhai for stealing his disciple and lying about his letters. He instructs the man to renounce the monkhood received from the Guru Bhai and return as a brahmachari with the original name. The man asks the Guru Bhai to let him go back to his real guru, but the Guru Bhai becomes angry too. Seeing the two gurus fighting and calling names the man decides to leave. First he returns to his original Guru, who bad mouths his Guru Bhai. So the man decides that BOTH are his guru, but he is disappointed in them both for fighting like mundane men over a worthless little disciple. Plus the man finds that life with the Guru Bhai was far more inspiring and "paaka," while life with original Guru is an institutional night mare of mixing men and women always chasing after money. Q: Does this man have No Guru? Or Two Gurus? Or One Guru? Who would be "True Guru" in the above example case? Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.