Guest guest Posted April 28, 2006 Report Share Posted April 28, 2006 Rudraksa The Properties and Biomedical Implications By Subas Rai Chapter V Epilogue Part One The present investigation as undertaken to identify and characterize the mythological Rudraksa of different Mukhi and to prove or disprove their bioeffects as described in the classical literature brings the following facts to the fore : Rudraksa proper is the seed of Elaeocarpus ganitrus Roxb of the genera of the Elaeocarpacae family. The seeds are covered with thorny protrusions and varying number of surficial furrows that characterize them into various Mukhis. Their specific gravity was found to differ and fall in the range of 1.1 to 1.6 pH measurement of their extracts showing some of them to be neutral while others to be alkaline adn acidic in nature. These variations may be attributed to maturity of the seed and locale of the tree they come from and hence may not be taken as distinguishing criteria. A study of their thorn surface tips shows marked difference among their microstructures and may thus be used with caution as distinguishing criterion for various Mukhis. Elemental analysis reveals that carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen form the bulk constituent of the seeds while their metallic content is less than 0.5 per cent. Magnetic susceptibility measurement reveals Diamagnetic Properties for Two Mukhi and Four Mukhi Beads, Paramagnetic Properties for One Mukhi and Three Mukhi Beads and Five Mukhi to 8 Mukhi Beads and Ferromagnetic Properties from Nine to Fourteen Mukhi Beads. Inductance (L) of all the Mukhis was found to increase with increasing frequency implying thereby their frequency dependent Ferromagnetic Properties. This Ferromagnetism has been attributed to the ferrous state of Iron (Fe++)forming the trace constituent (0.001%) of the Seeds. Similarly the capacitance of all the Mukhis was found to increase with increasing frequency excepting that of Two Mukhi and Four Mukhi Beads. The Rudraksa of the size of the Emblic myrobalan seeds were found to show maximum inductance and capacitance as compared to the smaller ones. Because of this reason Rudraska of larger size have been praised in the Puranas and smaller ones are rejected for use. To be continued in Part II Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.