Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Waterloo of Mainstream; even MRI inference can be wrong!

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Guest guest

ayurveda, "Shirish Bhate"

<shirishbhate wrote:

 

suspicions may be raised if you suffer two

> separate – and different – neurological malfunctions, and this is

the

> acid test before deciding to see the doctor.

 

 

So where would we find a reference to these two neurological

malfunctions Dr Bhate?

 

THanks!

 

Jane

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<*>

ayurveda/

 

<*>

ayurveda

 

<*> Your

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest guest

Standard diagnostic test to study the beginnings of multiple

sclerosis (MS) in mainstream medicine is an MRI (magnetic resonance

imaging) scan. This can detect `clinically silent' lesions in the

brain. That is what doctors are made to believe. But if you are

diagnosed to have MS, suspicions may be raised if you suffer two

separate – and different – neurological malfunctions, and this is the

acid test before deciding to see the doctor.

 

Though defacto standard, unfortunately, the scan is a hopelessly

inaccurate method of detection, and researchers have also discovered

that lesions – even lots of them in the brain – don't necessarily

indicate the presence of MS.

 

This striking piece of new research suggests that medicine doesn't

have any reliable tools at its disposable to detect MS. Worse, it

means that many cases of MS aren't MS at all, and patients and their

families go through years of hell when there isn't much wrong with

the person.

 

The MRC Health Services Research Collaboration in Bristol reviewed 29

studies on MRI and MS, and discovered that the scan could not rule

out – or rule in, come to that – the possibility of MS. The presence

of brain lesions didn't indicate MS, either. Even patients with 10

or more brain lesions didn't develop MS, the study found.

 

British Medical Journal, 2006; 332: 875-8.

 

The above find on internet was motivated by a case wherein nervous system shows super behaviour, but there is a BIG dormant tumor for a 20 year old boy! Does this not mean that we can have rest of living/dead universe in our body (parasites, bacteria, fungus, tumors etc) and live happily! What is detected here by researchers for MS, can be equally applicable for all kinds of cysts, tumors, fibroids...

 

dr bhate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

<*>

ayurveda/

 

<*>

ayurveda

 

<*> Your

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...