GEMSTONE FOR EXALTED ( uccha rashi) PLANET - YES/NO ?

[Guest guest]

HI ALL

 

IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

(AUSPICIOUS).

AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS

STRENGTH.

 

IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE

BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION?

 

CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

 

PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

[Guest guest]

Dear Deepak Ji,

 

Exaltation is a very important criteria for analysis. I will explain

it further. Venus is exalted in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of

Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.

 

It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted at a

particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the

Paramochha position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king lives

the life of a saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will the

most highest position. He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes of a

Bhogi. He does not leave his brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That is

why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king does

not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.

 

This is just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently. Now

lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining it

with the help of an example.

 

Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is

Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava. But

if you read further you will realize that every bad house carries

something good too. For example twelfth house also denotes salvation.

It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But salvation is

a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If there

is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the

difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and

interpretation needs to be done for everything.

 

As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give good

results only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i

said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need to see avastha,

bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.

 

 

|| Iti Shubham ||

 

Alok Jagawat

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789 wrote:

>

> HI ALL

>

> IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

> PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

> (AUSPICIOUS).

> AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS

> STRENGTH.

>

> IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE

> BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION?

>

> CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

>

> PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

>

[Guest guest]

I INVITE RESPECTED RICHARD SIR TO PUT LIGHT ON THIS ISSUE.

 

 

 

 

sacred-objects, "a_jagawat" <a_jagawat wrote:

>

> Dear Deepak Ji,

>

> Exaltation is a very important criteria for analysis. I will explain

> it further. Venus is exalted in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of

> Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.

>

> It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted at a

> particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the

> Paramochha position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king lives

> the life of a saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will the

> most highest position. He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes of a

> Bhogi. He does not leave his brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That is

> why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king does

> not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.

>

> This is just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently. Now

> lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining it

> with the help of an example.

>

> Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is

> Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava. But

> if you read further you will realize that every bad house carries

> something good too. For example twelfth house also denotes salvation.

> It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But salvation is

> a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If there

> is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the

> difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and

> interpretation needs to be done for everything.

>

> As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give good

> results only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i

> said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need to see avastha,

> bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.

>

>

> || Iti Shubham ||

>

> Alok Jagawat

>

>

>

>

sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:

> >

> > HI ALL

> >

> > IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

> > PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

> > (AUSPICIOUS).

> > AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS

> > STRENGTH.

> >

> > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE

> > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION?

> >

> > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

> >

> > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste!!!

 

In our experience exalted and neecha planets refer more to strength and

weakness. Other

things must be considered to determine if a graha is "anukul" or "pratikul" for

the chart. A

weak or strong Anukul-graha can always be stronger, but a weak or strong

Pratikul-graha

should never be made stronger. That is the philosophy of the Planetary

Gemologists

Association http://p-g-a.org

 

The Planetary Gemology World is divided into two (2) opposing philosophies,

viz., Anukul-

vad v/s Pratikul-vad:

 

ANUKULA-VAD: A gem will act "SAME" as it's planet - So gems should be chosen for

Anukul (favorable) grahas - AKA known as GOODISM

 

PRATIKUL-VAD: A gem will act "OPPOSITE" of it's planet - So gems should be

chosen for

Pratikul (unfavorable) grahas - AKA known as BADISM

 

Best rgds,

Richard

 

sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789 wrote:

>

> I INVITE RESPECTED RICHARD SIR TO PUT LIGHT ON THIS ISSUE.

>

>

>

>

> sacred-objects, "a_jagawat" <a_jagawat@> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Deepak Ji,

> >

> > Exaltation is a very important criteria for analysis. I will explain

> > it further. Venus is exalted in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of

> > Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.

> >

> > It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted at a

> > particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the

> > Paramochha position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king lives

> > the life of a saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will the

> > most highest position. He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes of a

> > Bhogi. He does not leave his brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That is

> > why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king does

> > not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.

> >

> > This is just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently. Now

> > lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining it

> > with the help of an example.

> >

> > Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is

> > Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava. But

> > if you read further you will realize that every bad house carries

> > something good too. For example twelfth house also denotes salvation.

> > It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But salvation is

> > a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If there

> > is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the

> > difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and

> > interpretation needs to be done for everything.

> >

> > As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give good

> > results only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i

> > said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need to see avastha,

> > bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.

> >

> >

> > || Iti Shubham ||

> >

> > Alok Jagawat

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:

> > >

> > > HI ALL

> > >

> > > IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

> > > PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

> > > (AUSPICIOUS).

> > > AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS

> > > STRENGTH.

> > >

> > > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE

> > > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION?

> > >

> > > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

> > >

> > > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

Dear,

 

If you do not understand and do not like to read anything then just

do not click the buttons.

 

It is easy.

 

With due respect to Richard Ji, he is not an astrologer. He is a

well versed in Gemology.

 

Regards

 

A.J

 

 

 

 

 

 

sacred-objects, "a_jagawat" <a_jagawat

wrote:

>

> Dear Deepak Ji,

>

> Exaltation is a very important criteria for analysis. I will

explain

> it further. Venus is exalted in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of

> Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.

>

> It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted

at a

> particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the

> Paramochha position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king

lives

> the life of a saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will

the

> most highest position. He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes

of a

> Bhogi. He does not leave his brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That

is

> why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king

does

> not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.

>

> This is just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently.

Now

> lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining

it

> with the help of an example.

>

> Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is

> Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava.

But

> if you read further you will realize that every bad house carries

> something good too. For example twelfth house also denotes

salvation.

> It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But

salvation is

> a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If

there

> is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the

> difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and

> interpretation needs to be done for everything.

>

> As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give

good

> results only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i

> said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need to see avastha,

> bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.

>

>

> || Iti Shubham ||

>

> Alok Jagawat

>

>

>

>

sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:

> >

> > HI ALL

> >

> > IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

> > PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

> > (AUSPICIOUS).

> > AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK

OF ITS

> > STRENGTH.

> >

> > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW

CAN HE

> > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN

EXALATION?

> >

> > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

> >

> > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

> >

>

[Guest guest]

dear a-jagwat

 

mind ur language who-so-ever you are. i read ur comments but never

said that i dint liked it , i just wanted an opinion of respected

richrd ji.

 

people like u think that they are the only expert people around here.

 

remember never be overconfident and egoistic regarding ur knowledge ,

coz there is some out there who might be better than u.

 

regards

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

sacred-objects, "a_jagawat" <a_jagawat wrote:

>

> Dear,

>

> If you do not understand and do not like to read anything then just

> do not click the buttons.

>

> It is easy.

>

> With due respect to Richard Ji, he is not an astrologer. He is a

> well versed in Gemology.

>

> Regards

>

> A.J

sacred-objects, "a_jagawat" <a_jagawat@>

> wrote:

> >

> > Dear Deepak Ji,

> >

> > Exaltation is a very important criteria for analysis. I will

> explain

> > it further. Venus is exalted in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of

> > Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.

> >

> > It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted

> at a

> > particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the

> > Paramochha position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king

> lives

> > the life of a saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will

> the

> > most highest position. He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes

> of a

> > Bhogi. He does not leave his brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That

> is

> > why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king

> does

> > not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.

> >

> > This is just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently.

> Now

> > lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining

> it

> > with the help of an example.

> >

> > Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is

> > Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava.

> But

> > if you read further you will realize that every bad house carries

> > something good too. For example twelfth house also denotes

> salvation.

> > It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But

> salvation is

> > a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If

> there

> > is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the

> > difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and

> > interpretation needs to be done for everything.

> >

> > As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give

> good

> > results only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i

> > said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need to see avastha,

> > bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.

> >

> >

> > || Iti Shubham ||

> >

> > Alok Jagawat

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:

> > >

> > > HI ALL

> > >

> > > IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A

> > > PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA

> > > (AUSPICIOUS).

> > > AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK

> OF ITS

> > > STRENGTH.

> > >

> > > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW

> CAN HE

> > > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST BECOZ IT IS IN

> EXALATION?

> > >

> > > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE RECOMMENDED?

> > >

> > > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.

> > >

> >

>

[Guest guest]

is easy.With due respect to Richard Ji, he is not an astrologer. He is a well

versed in Gemology. RegardsA.Jsacred-objects,

"a_jagawat" <a_jagawat wrote:>> Dear Deepak Ji,> > Exaltation is a very

important criteria for analysis. I will explain > it further. Venus is exalted

in Pisces and Pisces is a sign of > Jupiter. Jupiter is the enemy of Venus.> >

It is strange that Venus gets exalted in Pisces. Venus is exalted at a >

particular degree which is called Parmochha. Now think of the > Paramochha

position of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king lives > the life of a

saint surrouned by all lavish things then it will the > most highest position.

He will be like a yogi clad in the clothes of a > Bhogi. He does not leave his

brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That is

> why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when it enters Revati. The king does > not

gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.> > This is just an idea and everyone can

interpret it differently. Now > lets us talk about its lordship of houses. I am

again explaining it > with the help of an example.> > Venus is exalted in Pisces

in tenth house when the ascendant is > Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava

which is not a good bhava. But > if you read further you will realize that

every bad house carries > something good too. For example twelfth house also

denotes salvation. > It denotes expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But

salvation is > a good point and Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If

there > is any expenditure then it will done in good cause.This is the >

difference. Indian astrology has broader prospectives and > interpretation

needs to be done for everything.> > As far as stone is concerned ,stones of

exalted planets can give good > results only when they are verified at 20

different levels. Like i > said exaltation is not the only criteria. You need

to see avastha, > bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional charts and all.> > > || Iti

Shubham ||> > Alok Jagawat> > > > > > > > > > > --- In

sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:> >> > HI ALL> > > >

IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A> > PLANET IS

IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS SAID TO BE SHUBHA> > (AUSPICIOUS). > > AS

PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS> > STRENGTH.>

> > > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS LORD OF

UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE> > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS JUST

BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION? > > > > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET BE

RECOMMENDED?> > > > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.> >>

How low will we go? Check out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

[Guest guest]

of a king like Venus. Naturally when a king lives > the life of a saint

surrouned by all lavish things then it will the > most highest position. He

will be like a yogi clad in the clothes of a > Bhogi. He does not leave his

brain the " Revati' of Mercury. That is > why Venus is Parmochha in Pisces when

it enters Revati. The king does > not gets carried away by 'Bhoga'.> > This is

just an idea and everyone can interpret it differently. Now > lets us talk

about its lordship of houses. I am again explaining it > with the help of an

example.> > Venus is exalted in Pisces in tenth house when the ascendant is >

Gemini. Venus rules the Dwadasha Bhava which is not a good bhava. But > if you

read further you will realize that every bad house carries > something good

too. For example twelfth house also denotes salvation. > It denotes

expenditures, hospitals, life after death. But salvation is > a good point and

Venus hereby will give the result of Moksha. If there > is any expenditure then

it will done in good cause.This is the > difference. Indian astrology has

broader prospectives and > interpretation needs to be done for everything.> >

As far as stone is concerned ,stones of exalted planets can give good > results

only when they are verified at 20 different levels. Like i > said exaltation is

not the only criteria. You need to see avastha, > bhaga, pada, yogi, divisional

charts and all.> > > || Iti Shubham ||> > Alok Jagawat> > > > > > > > > > > ---

In sacred-objects, "DEEPAK" <dny789@> wrote:> >> > HI ALL> > > >

IN INDIA IT IS A COMMON PRACTICE OF

ASTROLOGERS TO SAY THAT IF A> > PLANET IS IN ITS UCCHA RASHI ( EXALATION) IT IS

SAID TO BE SHUBHA> > (AUSPICIOUS). > > AS PER PRICIPALS OF ASTROLOGY AN EXALTED

PLANET IS AT THE PEAK OF ITS> > STRENGTH.> > > > IF SUCH AN EXLATED PLANET IS

LORD OF UNAUSPICIOUS HOUSES , HOW CAN HE> > BE TERMED AS SHUBHA AND AUSPICIOUS

JUST BECOZ IT IS IN EXALATION? > > > > CAN GEMSTONE FOR SUCH A EXALTED PLANET

BE RECOMMENDED?> > > > PLZ PUT LIGHT ON THIS.> >> How low will we go? Check

out Messenger’s low PC-to-Phone call rates.

Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Messenger with Voice.