Astrological relations between planets and different mukhi Rudraksha

[Guest guest]

Dear Fellow Members

 

Regarding the astrological relations between planets and different

mukhi Rudraksha, I have not read all tantric and astrological books,

nor all the Puranas.

 

To be honest I am only repeating like a parrot what I have read by

Rudraksha experts, and I have never questioned their conclusions, such

as 1 mukhi=Sun, 2 mukhi=Moon, BUT, I would have thought that 3 mukhi

represented Jupiter, whose cosmic number is 3. Instead the experts have

listed in order of the week days rather than by cosmic number.

 

If Rudraksha is listed by associated "number" then it would be, 1

mukhi=Sun, 2 mukhi=Moon, 3 mukhi=Jupiter, 4 mukhi=Rahu, 5

mukhi=Mercury, 6 mukhi=Venus, 7 mukhi=Ketu, 8 mukhi =Saturn, and 9

mukhi=Mars. Further, 10 mukhi=Sun, 11 mukhi=Moon, 12 mukhi=Jupiter, 13

mukhi=Rahu, 14 mukhi=Mercury, 15 mukhi=Venus, 16 mukhi=Ketu, 17

mukhi=Saturn, and 18 mukhi=Mars.

 

But that is not what others have concluded. And I cannnot dispute

anything about Rudraksha for want of knowledge. If they ever change the

RR list to be as above, I'll be the first to accept it!!! Can you shed

some light on the Planet-Rudraksha relationship and how it came to be?

 

Warm rgds,

Richard

 

Richard Shaw-Brown, PG

Designer & Gemologist

http://www.richardshawbrown.com

http://www.agt-gems.com

http://www.astralgemstonetalismans.com

http://www.themisunderstood.com

http://www.hrisikesh.com

http://www.hrisikesh.net

http://www.p-g-a.org

http://www.satyavrat-shastri.net

http://www.generalprem.com

http://www.navaratna-museum.info

http://www.sacred-objects.info

 

Send instant messages to your online friends http://uk.messenger.

[Guest guest]

dear friend richard

 

you are right in saying that we are yet to find references from holy

scriptures attributing rudraksh to planets. however, various purans

have already given lordships for each type of rudraksh. i did some

research in this field and i recommend rudraksh based on the results

attributed to the rudraksha and also based on the lordship of the

rudraksha.

 

also i found some people not getting favourable results with wearing

ek mukh rudraksha both round and half-moon type. in shivapuran

under vidveshvar samhita, it is written that ek mukh rudraksha shall

be worshipped at the native's place. it is also written that where

this is worshipped, goddess of wealth laxmi dwells there. it is

further written in more clear terms that where this rudraksha is

worshipped, that place would be free of all problems and all natives

dwelling in that area would have all their desires fulfilled.

 

with best wishes and regards

arjun

 

, Richard Shaw Brown

<rsbj66 wrote:

>

> Dear Fellow Members

>

> Regarding the astrological relations between planets and different

> mukhi Rudraksha, I have not read all tantric and astrological

books,

> nor all the Puranas.

>

> To be honest I am only repeating like a parrot what I have read by

> Rudraksha experts, and I have never questioned their conclusions,

such

> as 1 mukhi=Sun, 2 mukhi=Moon, BUT, I would have thought that 3

mukhi

> represented Jupiter, whose cosmic number is 3. Instead the experts

have

> listed in order of the week days rather than by cosmic number.

>

> If Rudraksha is listed by associated "number" then it would be, 1

> mukhi=Sun, 2 mukhi=Moon, 3 mukhi=Jupiter, 4 mukhi=Rahu, 5

> mukhi=Mercury, 6 mukhi=Venus, 7 mukhi=Ketu, 8 mukhi =Saturn, and 9

> mukhi=Mars. Further, 10 mukhi=Sun, 11 mukhi=Moon, 12

mukhi=Jupiter, 13

> mukhi=Rahu, 14 mukhi=Mercury, 15 mukhi=Venus, 16 mukhi=Ketu, 17

> mukhi=Saturn, and 18 mukhi=Mars.

>

> But that is not what others have concluded. And I cannnot dispute

> anything about Rudraksha for want of knowledge. If they ever

change the

> RR list to be as above, I'll be the first to accept it!!! Can you

shed

> some light on the Planet-Rudraksha relationship and how it came to

be?

>

> Warm rgds,

> Richard

>

> Richard Shaw-Brown, PG

> Designer & Gemologist

> http://www.richardshawbrown.com

> http://www.agt-gems.com

> http://www.astralgemstonetalismans.com

> http://www.themisunderstood.com

> http://www.hrisikesh.com

> http://www.hrisikesh.net

> http://www.p-g-a.org

> http://www.satyavrat-shastri.net

> http://www.generalprem.com

> http://www.navaratna-museum.info

> http://www.sacred-objects.info

>

> Send instant messages to your online friends

http://uk.messenger.

>

[Guest guest]

Namaste Richard,

 

Rudra is Mahakala, and the various types of Rudraksha are intimately

connected with the 14 days of the lunar fortnight, which themselves are

divided among the 7 solar lords of the week.

 

Mahadeva!

[Guest guest]

Namaste Arjun,

 

True ek-mukhi rudraksha are exceedingly rare, and very good duplicates

are common! The half-moon type is very beautiful, but it is NOT a true

rudraksha.

 

ALL true rudraksha have a natural hole.

 

Most 2-mukhi rudrakshas are not true rudrakshas; and Indian 3-mukhi

rudrakshas are mostly obtained from a different tree.

 

4, 5, 6, 7, and 8-mukhi rudrakshas are readily available, but even the

most common 5-mukhi rudraksha is sometimes faked!

 

9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 (or more) mukhi rudraksha are available, but

true ones are never spherical.

 

All of the more valuable rudrakshas are very commonly faked, and some

duplicates are very difficult to distinguish from the real thing

(without destroying it!).

[Guest guest]

dear brother giri

om namo bhagawate rudraya

 

you are speaking with people who have done decades of research first

hand in rudraksha. if i have one decade experience, richard has two

decades in rudraksha. anyway your views are welcome in sharing more

about rudraksha.

 

your pessimistic comments on fake rudraksha are a little aberration

which shall be seen in isolation.

 

if you need genuine rudraksha with 100% buyback guarantee if proved

fake, you can contact me on my personal ID.

 

now let me answer all your queries one by one:

 

1. round and little oval shaped genuine ek mukh rudraksha from

himalayas and indonesia (not nepalese) are available easily from

rs.5100 to rs.11000.

2. half-moon type ek mukh rudraksha are not mentioned in the purans

for their shape/size but they too are genuine rudraksha.

3. the large size oval or diamond shaped two mukh rudraksh are

cheaper and easily availble ones but they too are genuine.

4. the himalayan two mukh rudraksha, small size and little oval in

shape are expensive and are genuine.

5. the nepalese genuine two mukh rudraksha costs anywhere above

rupees ten thousand.

6. the indian three mukh rudraksha is genuine and you can see its

trees even in haridwar.

7. nepalese three mukh are available plenty but are expensive.

8. all rudraksha from four to fourteen from nepal are available

genuinely if procured from good sources.

9. there is no fixed sphere or shape for 9 and upwards and all

shapes and sizes are available in genuine 9 to 14 and even upto 21.

10. one need not break a rudraksha and hurt its sanctity to know its

genuinity. if you procure from a good source, you feel the positive

vibrations within few days of wearing.

 

please feel free to ask your doubts on rudraksha and we would be

happy to clarify the same.

 

with best wishes

arjun

 

 

, "Sarabhanga Giri"

<sarabhanga wrote:

>

> Namaste Arjun,

>

> True ek-mukhi rudraksha are exceedingly rare, and very good

duplicates

> are common! The half-moon type is very beautiful, but it is NOT a

true

> rudraksha.

>

> ALL true rudraksha have a natural hole.

>

> Most 2-mukhi rudrakshas are not true rudrakshas; and Indian 3-

mukhi

> rudrakshas are mostly obtained from a different tree.

>

> 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8-mukhi rudrakshas are readily available, but even

the

> most common 5-mukhi rudraksha is sometimes faked!

>

> 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 (or more) mukhi rudraksha are available,

but

> true ones are never spherical.

>

> All of the more valuable rudrakshas are very commonly faked, and

some

> duplicates are very difficult to distinguish from the real thing

> (without destroying it!).

>