Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 On 12-Sep-05, at 3:41 AM, ayurveda wrote: > All elements in nature have a hidden or esoteric aspect. This aspect > of water has been superbly brought out in the book, "The Message from > Water" by Masaru Emoto. This book can be compared to the book, "The > hidden life of plants". > > A link to a synopsis of the book can be read here; > http://www.wellnessgoods.com/messages.asp > i am familiar with emoto's work, but the point at debate is whether or not boiling water some how "kills" it, not changes it energetically - this i already am aware of, and further, that boiling water is a valid technique in ayurveda to modify its energetic effects however - in a world where contaminated water is the number 1 "killer" of children i fail to see that boiling it is an unhealthy practice - indeed, it may be life saving, and that is my point i think its important to realize that we have people from all over the world on this list who might on occasion have "boil water" advisories issued to them, and in which case, i don't want anyone thinking that an esoteric concept can protect them from water-borne infection > Such cures cannot be explained by modern methods whereas to the > orthodox it would come as no surprise because they know that the prana > shakti, once activated can do anything and everything. So you see it > is not entirely faith that drives the orthodox but faith backed by > intuition, evidence and experience. i am not sure how the points i raised are an argument against intuition, evidence or experience indeed, orthodox beliefs often have nothing to do with intuition, and just as often inhibits a true "knowing" as for evidence and experience, these are often just as subtle, because they will change according to our perception, i.e. "facts" and "proof" are subjective experiences - the best we can come to is a consensus that admits some kind of diversity your statement "prana shakti, once activated can do anything and everything" may unfortunately comes across as a sales pitch for a particular belief, no doubt founded on some kind of experience, but ultimately, probably not different from someone who believes in the power of jesus christ or another potent belief, and hence we broach the field of semantics but in what some might call a pantomime of our true spiritual life the common truth is that nobody escapes physical suffering, whether prana shakti is activated or not - and hence ayurveda exists to alleviate, to palliate this delicate human condition, and has no confusion around the issue of immortality and illusion i do believe that we can awaken to our greatest potential, and prana shakti may be this but it seems to me that it also grace that is bestowed and has nothing to do with a particular belief or dogma, since anyone from any walk of life no matter how learned they are in the scriptures or traditions can experience it very often what any orthodoxy lacks is the humility to see the nature of this grace, and substitutes a formulaic adherence to petty ritualism and codes of conduct that may in fact limit potential to receive it but i don't believe that anything i am saying is all that much of a stretch for an indian to consider, because heterodox elements in indian spirituality have always been highly valued, even if viewed with suspicion and fear by some (especially those that have an investment in the status quo) i can imagine that the early wandering ayurvedic doctors who collected the sacred herbs, with matted hair, eccentric behaviors and apparently miraculous healing skills would have been regarded with some trepidation by your average villager, and yet it is to these physicians that we probably owe the tradition of ayurveda - and less the old men with their sacred threads and cult of exclusion who waggle their finger and pass judgment upon others - perhaps you may see an analogy when comparing alternative medicine practitioners with the medical establishment you rail against best... Caldecott todd www.toddcaldecott.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 12, 2005 Report Share Posted September 12, 2005 Dear Greetings. I feel you are getting unnecessarily worked up on the subject. We are all presenting different viewpoints, that's all. What I said in my previous mail was that students of ayurveda should be introduced to other concepts only after they are thoroughly grounded on their own subject. For example, Sri Ramakrishna who advocated the truth behind all religions did not ask everyone to practice all religions. Instead he asked his devotees to practice their own religion but be sympathetic to other genuine spiritual paths. I know that the Indian tendency to hark back at the past annoys Westerners. Why we talk of the past is because our traditions and links with our indigenous culture were broken by an alien civillisation and unfortunately the same concepts continues to rule the roost. To conquer us the invaders had to destroy our traditional knowledge. I believe the natives of other countries, like the Red Indians of America, too continue to cling to their own beliefs. Can you blame us? Most of us feel like fish out of water and yet cannot express ourselves without being criticised. I did not object to your heterodox approach. You are experienced enough in your field. But the neophyte in India often gets dazzled by jargon and hype. In the National Geographic programme on Ayurveda the production unit preferred to trace out ancient ayurveda and not the modern version. The various noted Indian authors on ayurveda too stress on the old notions and so do the Western authors who try to protect ayurveda from distortion in the hands of modern doctors. After one gets a good grasp of ayurvedic practice one can start assimilating knowledge from other systems, that is what I have always been trying to stress. Regards and cheer up please, Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 I am in South Louisiana and we get advisories to boil water all the time. Right now many of us still have to boil water from the hurricane and the rest cannot drink the local water at all from all the chemicals that got loose during the storm. I have been in many places in America that have the complacent attitude that boiling water is not ever necessary here, yet take all kinds of precautions overseas or in Mexico. We also tend to have the attitude that Americans don't get parasites, for some weird reason. I know differently having been treated for tapeworm in the past. Many doctors here say that we don't have parasites in the general population, but I am not sure that is correct. Shigella has gotten more common here and that is a waterbourne parasite, and with our agriculture methods other pathogens abound in our water supply. Can anyone else weigh in on this issue? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 dear jaggy... what makes you think i'm upset? this is a friendly debate and that is all there is no antagonism, and i think we agree on many points however, we may need to admit a diversity of thinking on others suggesting that i am upset or need of cheering up doesn't change that with affection... todd On 13-Sep-05, at 3:35 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Dear > > Greetings. I feel you are getting unnecessarily worked up on the > subject. We are all presenting different viewpoints, that's all. > Regards and cheer up please, Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 13, 2005 Report Share Posted September 13, 2005 Dear Darla, Today almost everyone drinks boiled water and it is proper too considering the pollution everywhere. But as per experts on the issue even boiling water may not remove all harmful elements. So today we have e-boiling (I really don't know what that means), passing UV rays through water, advanced filtering etc. I know the problem with most Americans, they are so used to very clean and hygenic water that they fall a prey to stomach disorders the moment they set foot in other countries. In India they are usually advised to drink beer instead. Regards, Jagannath. ayurveda, Darla Wells <lethe9@g...> wrote: > I am in South Louisiana and we get advisories to boil water all the time. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted September 14, 2005 Report Share Posted September 14, 2005 Todd talked about heating having the effect of energising water. I just read a chapter where it is said that keeping your bath water bucket out in the sun for some time helps you draw on the solar source of prana. So Todd is right, as he always is !! Regards, Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.