Guest guest Posted September 10, 2005 Report Share Posted September 10, 2005 Dear All elements in nature have a hidden or esoteric aspect. This aspect of water has been superbly brought out in the book, "The Message from Water" by Masaru Emoto. This book can be compared to the book, "The hidden life of plants". A link to a synopsis of the book can be read here; http://www.wellnessgoods.com/messages.asp Science has to progress from the seen to the "unseen" to understand these concepts. Today it is well known that the emotions emanating from us shape the world. This has always been obvious but it took science a very long time to come anywhere near it. This time lag sometimes irks the spiritual minded who, through faith or otherwise, already have access to such knowledge. Knowledge is more or less like a jigsaw puzzle where just one or two moves may help the intuitive man grasp the whole picture. Science has always hated such intuitive people often forgetting that many important "inventions" in science have resulted from such intuition. We know that the diagram for Benzoic Acid was derived from a dream where the concerned scientist saw a snake in a dream chasing its own tail. Also we have the case of an Indian mathematician (Ramanujam) who openly acknowledged that he saw the results of many a puzzling equation solved in dream sequences. Scientists also acknowledge the "flash" of brilliance whereby they are suddenly presented with the solution to complex problems. All this denote a higher power at work. Problems mostly arise because we don't give that higher power its due, raising our own ego in the process. Today many frustrated scientists refuse to acknowledge God. But then God, as he is widely perceived, is the source of all knowledge. To deny God is like admitting the existence of the Ganges while refusing to see the Himalayas. Ayurveda has benefitted a lot from such intuitive knowledge but unfortunately the student who undergoes ayurvedic courses in various colleges is not taught how to sharpen his intuitive skills. Rather he devotes more than 50% of his course period trying to learn the concepts of allopathy. After passing out he has to go through an unlearning process to be a sucesfull vaidya. You have rightly argued that we cannot totally reject modern concepts in developing ayurveda and that a heterodox approach is to be cultivated. But to be able to understand what amongst the modern concepts can actually benefit ayurveda requires a thorough grounding in the core concepts of ayurveda. Only a vaidya with a lot of experience behind him can decide on what to accept from sciences that are not immediately related to ayurveda. It is sad that person(s) belonging to a different school altogether are trying to discourage true vaidyas on this forum. Such a situation has resulted because ayurveda has been overshadowed by "systematic" thinking whereas it should have depended on the sort of logic that gave birth to ayurveda in the first place. We also have that logic emerging in modern science where scientists are acknowledging that a problem may have more than one solution and some of those solutions may appear to be conflicting while yielding the same result. And lastly, we should see the results obtained from various modes of thinking. Whether a particular mode is right or not depends entirely on whether it is able to cure patients. If a system, however big, fails to cure then patients start deserting it. We are seeing this phenomenon now in the case of allopathy as patients are frantically searching alternative methods of treatment. In todays episode of Swami Ramdev's programme on Astha channel, a patient reported that he had been cured of a hip bone ailment purely by pranayama exercises while he was advised hip replacement by modern doctors. He was not telling a lie because a team of about 40 mainstream doctors had studied his case and found his claim to be true. Such cures cannot be explained by modern methods whereas to the orthodox it would come as no surprise because they know that the prana shakti, once activated can do anything and everything. So you see it is not entirely faith that drives the orthodox but faith backed by intuition, evidence and experience. Regards, Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.