Shivambu Therapy, Heavy Metals

[Guest guest]

ayurveda, Keshav Aysola

<ayur_shakti> wrote:

> Dear Jagannath

>

> Thanks for the clarification but I am still not

> convinced. You mentioned that the partially digested

> material forms the bulk of urine that needs to be

> reused to cure several ailments.

 

Dear Dr. Aysola,

 

Namaskar. I understand your concerns. Usually only the sick are

advised Urine Therapy. You know the disease process in the human

physical body often starts at the digestive level. The body cannot

consume and assimilate even beneficial elements. However the

digestive juices do act on the elements while the food remains in the

stomach. This renders the nutrients partially digested. As they

cannot be digested in any other manner, because they do not go into

the bloodstream, the body rejects them as urine. However when the

urine is reingested these partially digested nutrients are now easily

digestible.

 

I too was sceptical like you when I came across this concept, as you

guessed, during Sri Morarji Desai's time. But I did feel that a

person like Sri Desai would not adopt any procedure without proper

verification. Later I came across certain articles by naturopaths and

ayurveds and also an acknowledgement of the practice by doctors of

the biochemic system of medicine, discovered by Dr. Schussler.

 

In India certain systems have continued since a long time just

because people have been benefitted. Near my ancestral village there

existed a practice of branding people with a red hot iron in certain

places of their body depending on the disease they had. My

Grandfather as well as many village elders had those marks in their

bodies which I could recognise as accupressure/accupuncture points.

 

In Orissa also very near the capital city of Bhubaneswar exists a

place, Kalupada Ghat, where such iron brandings, combined with herbal

elements are used to treat fractures. People go to these vaidyas to

get their broken bones set right after allopathic procedures fail.

Even doctors have benefitted from this procedure though they admit

that the process is exactly opposite of what modern medicine

recommends.

 

I think the proof of the pudding lies in the eating (or drinking !!).

Only when we are benefitted by an unorthodox system of treatment do

we change our views. We all know how the fish medicine of Andhra

Pradesh is being opposed by rationalists but the Govt can do little

to check the practice as patients are being benefitted.

 

Therefore as I said, we should learn to depend upon clinical evidence

also. A classic case is homeopathy. The modern scientists admit that

it works but oppose it on the ground that they do not understand how

it works. This is the scientific myopia that needs a cure.

 

Regards,

Jagannath.