Guest guest Posted July 4, 2005 Report Share Posted July 4, 2005 Dear All, Somehow I felt that the present infighting among the elitists buttressing varied viewpoints on system of mediccation a bit far-fetched. We are unnecessarily trying to compare Bangladesh cricket team with Australian cricket team and expecting identical results! 1.0 Ayurveda has history of thousand years behind it.It is a different issue that it lost its way due to political factors. Modern medical science is not even hundred years old. Ayurveda must have passed through similar upheavals in its formative years. Understanding the root cause of body problem is not an easy matter. I presume that thousands of years back, Ayurveda must have started with symptom based medication. It must have gone through few hundred years research to assimilate the understanding of body science and gradually changed to knowledge based medical science instead of symptom based science. As well known to all, formative years of Homeopathy was also not full of roses. Coming century would be the century of bioiscience. Research of genetics would allow Allopathy to gather sufficient knowlege to be considered at par with Ayurveda. It would certainly change to body-knowledge therapy from Symtomatic therapy. I am absolutely sure that it would not take more than 70-80 years. Modern Chemistry and Modern Physics also had taken less than 100 years to understand Quantum mechanics. Only the conflict between Cosmic science and quantum mechanics are waiting to be resolved. It means that Gravitational laws would be the part of Unified Field theory. 2.0 As a common man, certain aspects I do not realize. Any system of medication cannot go beyond 92 naturally available elements. Therefore a few questions automatically come to our mind. a) As knowledge of the body is not fully understood in allopathy and it is likely to vary person to person, symptom based drug creates rise in toxicity level in certain quarters. Some of the elements being consumed may contradict the body mechanism of certain individuals. Ayurveda tries to correct Mind-Body- Soul imbalance. Allopathy also tries to correct Sodium - Pottasium imbalance.Allopathy does not take care of soul. Whether Ayurveda takes care of Soul in day-to day therapy? Where is the actual problem ? Is it the drug asynchronism to body mechanism main problem? b) Homeopathy is Immunology based medication. Same is followed in Allopathy for vaccination. c) Accupunture tries to energise the electrical signal. Pranayam may be doing the same thing in different way. Conclusion : 1) Symptom based therapy coupled with genetic knowledge might catapult Allpopathy to follow same approach as in Ayurveda. It may take another 70 years. 2) Body mechnism is highly complex and least understood among all the sciences. Different therapists try to attack the disease in different way. Six blind men should not try to form an opinion over the whole elephant. 3) I go to allopathic specialist for cardiac and diabetic problem, to Homeopath for cold & cough and to Ayurvedist for Urinary tract infection. This choice depends on many factors. 4) System integration of different types of medication cannot be ruled out in 50 years time frame. Regards Asis Das Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2005 Report Share Posted July 4, 2005 Dear Asis Babu, Namaskar. It is obvious that you are more of a scientist than a medical person. This very thing is the bane of modern medicine. Today's scientists are physical scientists. They find it very difficult to go beyond matter. And matter cannot form the basis for studying the creation called man. We see the nuclear physicists at their wits end trying to come to terms with certain results which are the outcome of their experiments; 1. Light is both particle and a wave. 2. The subject affects the object. 3. If there is no subject there is no object. These are only some of the puzzles before the modern scientists. To solve these puzzles they have to go beyond matter, beyond the senses and beyond reason, beyond logic. One can easily understand their frustration. For these factors; matter, senses, reason and logic are like the four legs of the animal called "science". This is why scientists are spending more time today studying philosophical texts than pouring over scientific journals. They are now preferring Confucious over Einstein. Even Einstein was philosophical but today's scientists are a confounded lot. They find it very difficult to comprehend the elephant even with their eyes open. This is not without reason; the elephant simply is not there. It is puerile to assume that the ayurveds struggled with physical symptoms. Ayurveda is known as the fifth Veda, coming after the other four. Therefore highly developed brains were at work while putting the foundations of ayurveda unlike the greedy/selfish/power hungry medical professionals of today who are more interested in their earnings than the health of their patients. I am not the only person saying this. The whole world is sore on this issue. The earlier ayurveds studied herbs, the modern doctors are also doing the same. The modern doctors are armed with a gallery of instruments ranging from tweezers to the electron microscope. Tell me are the findings of today different from the findings of those "cave men"? It was a prophecy of those days that in the kali yuga men would forget the power of mantras and would become dependant on yantras. True to that prediction we have lost the power of our minds and hence imagine ourselves to be the body. We have forgotten consciousness and become associated with matter. Allopathy is a so called "medical science" that has not yet been able to trace the life force. Without this knowledge it is not possible to define the disease force. And without defining the disease force you cannot form a medical science. You are amassing a huge army but you do not know who your enemy is. Can there be anything more amusing than this? As regards homeopathy, the curative factor was found first and everything else came later. It is like the egg was born before the hen. Hahnemann accidentally tried a drug on himself, the bark of the China tree, and found homeopathy. It took him a lifetime to define what he found and form solid principles upon which to act. You are completely out of tune when you talk of the limitation of the 92 naturally occuring elements. Homeopathy and ayurveda ostensibly work with these elements, and many other elements from the vegetable and animal kingdom, but what is used is not the physical elements but the curative property inherent within them. The curative property used by alternative medicine is beyond the understanding of modern medicine. They therefore also find it difficult to understand how ayurved's and homeopath's can work with toxic elements and yet show no signs of toxicity. I will of course agree that modern science has done within a 100 years what the earlier seers have not been able to do in thousands of years. It has brought our civillisation on the brink of extinction. Thousands of species have disappeared from the face of the earth. Human beings have lost their humanity and turned into animals. Our environment, air, and water is today poisoned beyond redemption. Today's forest cover is hardly a fraction of what it was even 50 years ago. Mining activities have left the earth empty and scarred. Clearly modern science has achieved a lot. Congratulations !!! As for genetic knowledge, even the scientists do not know what kind of a Frankestein they will be creating next. Genetically modified plants have thrown up an entirely new crop of mind boggling problems. None of the genetically engineered animals have survived. Genetic experiments on human beings have had tragic endings. And you say medical science will be conquering disease in another 70-80 years? Again for your information alternate medicine is holistic is approach unlike "modern medicine" which is reductionist in approach. Even a small child with a slight common sense can say that we cannot make a man out of combining all the organs. And it is also childish to assume that one organ has no effect on another.Probably you are not aware but the allopaths themselves want to revert back to the general practitioner approach of yore. The WHO, to the detriment of the allopaths, has recognised this holistic approach and also praised the efforts of alternative medicine in its role to properly understand disease and cure. It is thus not a surprise why modern medicine is today trying to ban alternative medicine via rules such as DSHEA and Codex. I think the scientists should restrict themselves to things scientific and leave the GENUINE medical community alone. They will do better to study robotics and make robots instead of trying to understand human beings. Allopathy too will be extremely effective there. The robots will be loyal to the scientists unlike human beings who are today rising against them. Regards, Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 4, 2005 Report Share Posted July 4, 2005 Wow. That was very well said. I wish I had the ability within my own limited mind and personality to express myself so well. Good job. Ryan Kurczak In a message dated 7/4/2005 1:39:40 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jagchat01 writes: Dear Asis Babu, Namaskar. It is obvious that you are more of a scientist than a medical person. This very thing is the bane of modern medicine. Message truncated by moderator, entire message can be reat at: http://health.ayurveda/messages/4099 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 5, 2005 Report Share Posted July 5, 2005 ayurveda, ascendwv@a... wrote: > Wow. That was very well said. I wish I had the ability within my own > limited mind and personality to express myself so well. > > Good job. > Ryan Kurczak Dear Ryan, Thank you for the appreciation. Actually if you are confident that you are right, you have the zeal to fight for a just cause, you immerse yourself with your heart and soul into the issue, if you are fighting without any selfish motive, and if you have belief in yourself and are not afraid of opposition then everything is possible. And also you should be willing to develop a (very) thick skin !! Regards, Jagannath. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.