Guest guest Posted June 28, 2005 Report Share Posted June 28, 2005 Dear Namaskar. A wonderful analysis. I too was very sceptical about this and so expressed my reservations in the title of my mail itself. I went to the website of the author and was not impressed. The new age movement is at a very nascent stage, with many people chipping in just for the money. It will take a lot of time for the dust to settle down and thus separate the chaff from the real thing. The movement is, till now, a crude attempt to unite the various forms of healing from ayurveda and nature cure to spiritual healing. The people involved know something about ayurveda but not enough to know that ayurveda contains everything. Or maybe they know but are trying to pass it off as their own invention. I believe there is a discussion about a change in the Hippocratic Oath, but it's not yet final else we must have had it splashed all over the press. There is also an attempt to reducate doctors periodically so that they don't have to depend on the medical representatives for continuing education. A separate chapter on the ethical issues in medicine is also being debated for inclusion into the curriculum. This is the scene in India. But will these cosmetic changes suffice? The society, or any group for that matter depends on the activity of the individuals. So I guess it all boils down to the responsibilities of the parents and the primary school teachers to build better individuals. Thanks Todd. If you give your permission I'll circulate your analysis among my friends. Regards, Jagannath. ayurveda, Todd Caldecott <todd@t...> wrote: > there are so many problems with this that i don't know where to begin, but i'll give it a shot Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.