Guest guest Posted June 20, 2005 Report Share Posted June 20, 2005 While choosing a place to deliver your baby, the question is not who knows better technology of childbirth, but who creates a proper environment for easier and safer birth. The National Childbirth Trust, UK also sought answers to this question[1]. Even American Public Health Association recommends to increase access to out-of- hospital maternity care services with direct entry midwives in the United States[2]. [1] http://www.obgynworld.com/international/news/2005/Week_24/Day_2/Ward_e nvironment_hin.asp Ward environment hinders labor Source: National Childbirth Trust, UK A survey of new mothers in the UK explores whether the environment in which they gave birth influenced their delivery. Inhospitable surroundings and cramped conditions on maternity wards make labor more difficult and uncomfortable for women, a report by the UK's National Childbirth Trust (NCT) suggests. Among the almost 700 women involved in the survey, 26 percent felt that being in a labor room with white walls and resuscitation equipment in full view made it more difficult for them to cope with giving birth than if they had been in a homely environment. A lack of space to move or walk around freely was reported by 17 percent of respondents, with the NCT finding that insufficient space to try different positions was associated with a 26 percent risk of emergency cesarean, compared with a 12 percent risk among those free to move. The women also reported little control over their surroundings during labor, with 49 percent unable to control who entered the room, 67 percent unable to change the temperature, and 40 percent having no control over lighting. "Many worthwhile changes don't cost a lot of money," said Mary Newburn, head of policy research at the NCT. "Beds can be moved to the side of the room to give the women more space to move around, people should be asked to knock before entering, and rooms should be made to feel more homely without lots of clinical equipment in view." [2] Home birth safe for low-risk pregnancies <http://reuters.us.ed10.net/h/Z6N32/958FE/HK/Q89R> Acccording to research on Canadian and American births, for women at low risk for complications, planned home births for using certified professional midwives are just as safe as hospital births. Moreover, the good outcomes are achieved using less than 1/2 the medical interventions: * episiotomy: 2.1% of home deliveries vs 33% in hospital * forceps delivery: 1% vs 2.2% * caesarean section: 3.7% vs 19% These findings "support the American Public Health Association's recommendation to increase access to out-of-hospital maternity care services with direct entry midwives in the United States," researchers conclude. ayurveda, durgesh mankikar <d_mankikar> wrote: > Dr Bhate presents a great research from our own archives. > > But this is also an excellent way to say that Practicing Doctors know less than Midwivwes. > Its almost like saying Doctors know less than Medical students, who know less than the nurses, who know less than the technicians who work in hospitals, who know less than the various non-medical people who work at the hospital like the garage attendants, etc...... > > For every case , as the one you mention, and I do empathize with their problems, one should ask hundreds of women, whether they actually benefitted from going to doctors, and getting epidurals. We cannot generalize on the entire profession of medicine based on anecdotal stories. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.