Guest guest Posted August 26, 2004 Report Share Posted August 26, 2004 Hello all, While I admire the Indian penchant for classification, sometimes I feel that an unreal element creeps in when things become so highly systematized. for example, Chyavanaprash is also a naimittika rasayana, used in the treatment of diseases such as consumption, cough and asthma. i worry that people on the list will get confused and think that certain remedies can only be used along the lines described. in reality, the benefit of a remedy is specific to the individual circumstances, and there is a high degree of flexibility - this is what i appreciate about Ayurveda and herbal medicine generally. Thus, a herb like Pippali has a myriad of uses, as a kamya and naimittika rasayana, but is also vajikarana (sexual rejuvenative), dipanapachana (digestive stimulant), bhedana (aperient), krimiaghna (antihelminthic), jvaraghna (febrifuge), chedana (expectorant), kasahara (antitussive), svasahara (bronchial antispasmodic), kushtaghna (alterative), mutravirechana (diuretic), medohara (metabolic stimulant), hrdaya (cardiac trophorestorative) etc. etc. It takes both intelligence and experience, combined with the great wisdom of the plant itself to really understand these things. As one my colleagues Michael Moore (the herbalist, not filmaker) has said (and I paraphrase), there are exceptions to every rule in nature, since nature hasn't read the textbooks... i think we always need to come back to Vagbhata, who clearly states that the only thing you need to know is the qualities of the doshas and their manifestation. knowing this, one can address it through remedies that counter these qualities. all the terms and systems that surround this intrinsic knowledge and may intimidate those of you for whom classification and systemization is of secondary importance. not all of us need to keep our underwear drawer meticulously organized... blessings... Caldecott todd www.toddcaldecott.com Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 27, 2004 Report Share Posted August 27, 2004 I just last evening had an argument with an aquaintance over the uses of Chyavanprash. I said that it was a good blood purifier, balanced out water retention, and was an excellent anti-oxidant. But that it was not recommended to be taken in the summer, because it was too heating. My aquaintance (who likes to challenge authority) said, "why not take it in the summer anyway? Everybody responds to medicines differently. It might benefit you anyway. If you get heated, sit in an air-conditioned room." What specific effects does Chyavanprash cause that are "heating" in summer? -- Len/ Kalipadma Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 28, 2004 Report Share Posted August 28, 2004 > > What specific effects does Chyavanprash cause that are "heating" in > summer? > Pippali, ashwagandha and saffron may be some ingredients that aggravate pitta; though the amount of each is pretty small that it is OK to take in the summer. Amalaki which constitutes a rasayana for pitta is the major portion, so it is beneficial for pittas even in the summer. But different manufacturers clearly mix in different amount of ingredients, which is readily detected by the taste. Some have a strong pungent taste which is not good for pittas, others have a strong sweet taste. If you get chyavanaprash from a traditional manufacturer, I think it is Ok for pittas even in summer. I am told that Dabur is one of the worst brands; the quality is so bad (from using mass manufacturing methods) that they mix in chemical preservatives for long shelf life. -yogaman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.