Guest guest Posted March 22, 2004 Report Share Posted March 22, 2004 > > Isn't this idea of "you have this symptom, so take this herb" perhaps > > a pollution of pure > > Ayurveda with the ideas of allopathy? In other words, you are sick, > > so take this drug to stop > > the symptoms. > > > > Would it not be better to emphasize proper diet, pancha karma and > > perhaps a little fasting > > when feverish? > > > > We raised two sons (before adopting Ayurveda) and never gave them > > drugs, rather we fasted a fever. > > > > If a diet includes processed foods, white flour, white sugar, fried > > food, overeating, etc. is that > > not where the attention should go to solve the problem, rather than > > looking for the magic bullet to solve a symptom temporarily? > > > > Thanks, > > Janaka > Janaka you are absolutely right diet is an important component in chronic URI in children i consistently found that the key is to remove all dairy, flour and sugar from the diet and boost immunosupportive foods and nutrients, e.g. garlic, ginger, amla, fresh vegetables, healthy meats and fats etc. a chronic URI is essentially a chronic ama/kapha condition, so building agni is key, and in long term conditions, also supporting ojas but only after there are no symptoms of ama/kapha to this end partly clearing and partly nutritive approaches are best, such as plain old chicken soup medicated with garlic and ginger is an excellent therapy; for added effect one can throw other herbs in like astragalus, which is traditionally made as a soup anyway btw, pancha karma is not used when there is ama, and nor do I think it is necessary to treat chronic colds and flus as for allopathy, the term was coined by modern homeopaths to distinguish the principle of "like cures like" (viparitharthakari upashaya) versus using a medicament that is opposite in nature to the condition being treated (viparita upashaya) in this respect, much of Ayurveda is allopathic, as is Western medicine the difference between them is holism, not allopathy an Ayurvedic practitioner that simply recommends herb A for condition B w/o looking for cause is being "reductionist," not holistic, although may still be allopathic of course Ayurveda also recommends homeopathic therapies (viparitharthakari upashaya), typified by the practice of Ayurvedic homeopathy, which is probably the best in the world both allopathy and homeopathy are used in Ayurveda, but like most traditional systems of medicine, the former dominates homeopathic therapies originally were often a kind of religious or spiritual therapy, such as making a paste of the charred remains of a bow string and applying it to the a woman's belly in stalled labor the hope would be that the power of the unguent would cause the woman to shoot out the baby like an arrow many of the bhasmas that contain toxic compounds such as mercury but are taken in tiny amounts after being purified could also be considered to be a kind of homeopathy; modern homeopathy however is much more rigid in its system of correspondences Caldecott phyto http://www.wrc.net/phyto Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.