Guest guest Posted February 17, 2004 Report Share Posted February 17, 2004 ok AND? do you want to respond to my audacious statement ;-) with all due respect Ayurveda IS damaged it doesn't mean its not venerable or has a lot to offer, but it is damaged nonetheless it is further damaged when it gets irrevocably mixed up with paraspiritual philosophies like vegetarianism that have nothing to do with it fortunately the damage isn't as severe as other post-colonial experiences, e.g. First Nations healing in North America which by all accounts employed a highly sophisticated system of healing that in part forms the basis of Thomsonism and physiomedicalism (i.e. western herbal medicine) the fault doesn't lie with Ayurveda, it lies with the colonial powers, for e.g. one striking example of the damage in Ayurveda is in nadi pariksha and other diagnostic techniques most BAM Ayurvedic physicians aren't taught and don't practice nadi pariksha, or the systems they practice are totally nonsensical, wholly impractical and unsupported by the literature (of which there is a dearth - Nadivijnanam by Kanada and another much more recent text by Shankara Sen is about it - i do not trust much of the modern stuff at all, for the same reason that people will tell our friend Bonnie on the list that her problem relates to Kapha when it obviously doesn't) personally, i use rely upon these texts (which for some reason are translated incorrectly!), as well as my knowledge of Tibetan and Chinese pulse dx for eg. most modern texts on pulse dx will tell you that the vata pulse is felt under the 1st finger this cannot be inferred from the Nadivijnanam, which indicates it is felt under the ring finger thus the ring finger illustrates vata sthana, middle is pitta, and index is kapha sthana note the correspondences with the Chinese pulse diagnosis and the concept of the triple burner i explain this in much greater detail in my book which i hope to put the finishing touches on this year i think the Chinese generally have good understanding of pulse, but of course the incorrect translations and correspondences like "Spleen" and "Liver" serve to obfuscate the issue somewhat best... Todd On Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 03:52 AM, ayurveda wrote: > Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:12:27 -0800 (PST) > Rucha Kelkar <ayurbliss > ayurveda > > Dear > > Your conclusions about Ayurveda seem to be very generalised. > > Best Regards > Rucha Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.