Guest guest Posted January 2, 2006 Report Share Posted January 2, 2006 FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt"> XII When we compare Lalita sahasranama with the candi-mahatamaya we see what a great change has come over the worship of the Goddess through the influence of the Tantric ides . As , in the earlier poems we have in Lalita too references to the fight of the Goddess with a demon . But the war in the alito-pakhyana is on a more refined plane , as Bhanda is amore refined Asura than the bison-headed Mahisa; and ,as their names indicate ,Lalita represents the gentle side , and candi the fierce side of the Goddess . Probably both the fights were meant to be allegories .If so ,Mahisa could be beast in man , and Bhanda the ego in man and the Devi the Divine spark in him . To realize the God in himself man has to conquer first of all the beast in himself and at a later stage the egoism in himself .The second fight is on a much higher level and with superior weapons---Astras instead of Sastras . In the earlier fights , man resorts to laws and regulations , and in the later to prayer and contemplation . In truth the battle on the both the front is a never-ending one .For these Asuras never die. Slain in one form they rise in another and renew the attack . mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> But ,fortunately , it is the better side of the Tantras that has influenced the Lalitasahasranama . At the commencement of the poem the author describes at length the person of the Goddess and refers throughout the litany to her marvellous beauty. Her jehels ,her flowers ,her smiles and her likes and dislikes are all revealed to us with such exquisiteskill that we feel the gracious presence of the Devi and believ that she is really as the poet says , a maha-lavanya-sevsdhih------ a treasure-house of beauty. Sahasranama is the most artistic one . But we do not read the Lalita for its poetry . We read it for its religious content .And from point of view of religious thoughts ,if we compare it with the odes in the Candi-mahatmya we are struck at once with its far wider range and its greater depth and variety . 'Times New Roman'; FONT-SIZE: 14pt; mso-bidi-font-size: 12.0pt; mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA"> But ,fortunately , it is the better side of the Tantras that has influenced the Lalitasahasranama . At the commencement of the poem the author describes at length the person of the Goddess and refers throughout the litany to her marvellous beauty. Her jehels ,her flowers ,her smiles and her likes and dislikes are all revealed to us with such exquisiteskill that we feel the gracious presence of the Devi and believ that she is really as the poet says , a maha-lavanya-sevsdhih------ a treasure-house of beauty. Sahasranama is the most artistic one . But we do not read the Lalita for its poetry . We read it for its religious content .And from point of view of religious thoughts ,if we compare it with the odes in the Candi-mahatmya we are struck at once with its far wider range and its greater depth and variety . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.