Guest guest Posted June 21, 2005 Report Share Posted June 21, 2005 Respected All, We will continue to listen from Andrè L. Delbecq, D.B.A., Director - Institute for Spirituality and Organisation Leadership, J. Thomas and Kathleen L. McCarthy University Professor, Santa Clara University, Alameda, CA, USA. --- "What comes to mind are two boards on which I sit. Both are organisations that possess clarity regarding their purpose. The first is a large health care system that resulted from the merger of several smaller organisations. The members of the board and the executive team conceive of their organisation as a "healing ministry" with particular emphasis on health services for the poor. Because of the clarity of organisational purpose, its culture is such that decisions constantly return to concern for the poor as an overriding value. Difficult decisions are undertaken to construct a portfolio of hospitals and clinics positioned within major market areas in service to the urban and rural poor. This also requires that sufficient market power is present in an individual setting so that the effort is financially sustainable. Very trying decisions have been undertaken to close some hospitals, to merge others, and to reinvest in others; yet the decisions are always calibrated against the organisational mission. This has required self-sacrificing discernment on the part of the leaders. What makes decision making different in this setting is that these leaders are willing to place the needs of the poor ahead of personal ambition, convenience or financial gain. It is a different experience to participate on this board. The second organisation is a technology company that has evolved a product that will provide an important benefit to human kind. This smaller organisation and its leaders are aware that they do not possess the brand, market distribution, or financial power to fully utilise their discovery. So we are engaged in discernment regarding the merger of the organisation with a larger organisation. As a result, the present management team will obsolete itself. In both of these organisations, the greater spiritual purpose of the organisation is resulting in decisions that can be characterised by a greater degree of selflessness. Of course, leadership is always challenged to "obsolete itself". A mission well performed often means the organisation will require a new skill set. I find my role is frequently to support the courage required on the part of executives engaged in such decisions. I try to help them remain in touch with a belief that when a particular mission is accomplished, their skills will be well used in the future, however differently their gifts may be expressed." © Global Dharma Center 2004 http://www.globaldharma.org Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.