Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

To Temba and Linda on i, mine etc.

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Namah Shivaya,

We are limited by language, somewhat, and "I", "mine", "you". It is for

the sake of convenience that we use these pronouns and adjectives, etc..

Otherwise it would be mighty confusing. Plus there is the fact that I,

this person, certainly very much has ego, a sense of separation, as much

as I wish I didn't. Then I would be one with Mother, which I wouldn't

mind at all, but then "I" wouldn't be around to care.In the meantime,

language is one of the best means of communication, as far as I know,

so personal pronouns come in handy.

But then, Temba, I understand what you are saying of giving with

expectation. That's why Mother emphasizes selfless service. My guess is

that most people do seva because it makes them feel closer to the

divine. I do believe that is one reason we are encouraged to dedicate

our work, be it scrubbing floors or whatever, to God. It helps US focus

on the divine. As Mother says, God doesn't need our help.

When I used to work with kids, I used to feel that I often learned more

from them, than them from me. It was a neat feeling. It's all about the

connection between people. When that connection happens we are closer to

feeling at one with each other.

 

Jai Ma!

Prasadini

 

nierika wrote:

>

> Temba wrote:

>

> ...the more of what "I" wanted is what keeps us in bondage."I got

> more from

> giving".so now we may begin to give in order to recieve more,instead

> of just

> giving only for the joy of giving with no expectation of recieving

> anything

> in return.we may think. "oh yeah if i do seva,(which is giving)this

> may get

> me closer to AMMA etc.when we do seva with an open heart and the right

> awaweness we are closer to AMMA THEN WE MAY REALIZE.

>

>

> Dear Temba ~ I am concerned a bit that you are reading too much into

> what

> some people are innocently saying. If I say, for example, about my

> Tarot and

> other workshops, that "I" got as much out of it as "my" students, for

> me, this

> is a statement of wonder and gratitude, and the use of the word, "I,"

> is for

> convenience. I never did, nor would I, if I started doing them again,

> think to

> myself, "oh, I will do as many as I can so I can get the more out of

> it than

> I get." This would put me in the position of a cat chasing its own tail.

>

> We must have some way to refer to ourselves when we talk about our

> experiences. Otherwise, who is writing this email? Who wrote the email

> "I" am

> responding to ... and ultimately, this would seem to turn into a

> circle that would

> cause a person to possibly question, "why am 'I' participating in

> this digest

> at all?"

>

> We come here because this is a satsang in cyberspace. For some of us,

> it is

> the only satsang available to us. I am very aware that Amma has said

> we must

> get rid of "I" and "mine," but I'm not sure She was referring to

> conversations, which is what the digest is ... it is conversations

> between "me" and "you,"

> or between "me" and the group, or between some other "me" and another

> person

> or the group. Of course, we could all use a term such as "this child"

> when

> we are talking about ourselves or our experiences to get around the

> problem of

> seeming to sound egotistical, but if we are doing it just to get away

> from

> using the terms "I" and "mine," we really have not changed anything,

> and it is

> just subterfuge.

>

> When "I" read an email from anyone in the group, "I" don't make

> anything out

> of their use of the word, "I," when referring to their experience. "I"

> realize it is a convenience and that it is not up to me to try to

> figure out or

> judge the use of the word, "I" by another person. And it is really

> additionally

> tiresome, literally, in terms of my health, to remember to keep using

> quotation marks around the word, "I." So I pray we all remember that,

> in sharing our

> experiences, that we are each unique and in the sharing, others are

> enriched, and that we not become overly worried about the use of

> personal pronouns.

> At Amma's feet ~ Linda

>

>

>

>

>

>

>

> Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha!

>

>

>

>

> Mata amritanandamayi

>

</gads?t=ms&k=Mata+amritanandamayi&w1=Mata+amritanandamay\

i&c=1&s=26&.sig=DYRmPW4tjbUZrNprNMY6xw>

>

>

>

> ------

>

>

> * Visit your group "Ammachi

> <Ammachi>" on the web.

>

> *

> Ammachi

> <Ammachi?subject=Un>

>

> * Terms of

> Service <>.

>

>

> ------

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

thankyou for sharing this my sister .you have through AMMAs grace helped to

increase MOTHERS sons awareness.when MOTHERS son ran across this info. in

AWAKEN CHILDREN,he was like wow!another level of awareness.its just

witnessing yourself on another level.its learning to watch the expectation

so that it can be dealt with,therefoe the connection with each other can be

deeper.this is something that he learned from MOTHER TEACHINGS and JESUS

as well.its not about communiaction.its more about being more aware of the

SUBLTE EGO.and also when MOTHERS son is speaking to you ,he is speaking to

himself.your comments help him to grow.thankyou my dear sister and daughter

of AMMA.

 

>Prasadini <ganesh1008

>Ammachi

>Ammachi

>Re: Re: To Temba and Linda on "i", "mine" etc.

>Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:36:31 -0800

>

>Namah Shivaya,

>We are limited by language, somewhat, and "I", "mine", "you". It is for

>the sake of convenience that we use these pronouns and adjectives, etc..

>Otherwise it would be mighty confusing. Plus there is the fact that I,

>this person, certainly very much has ego, a sense of separation, as much

>as I wish I didn't. Then I would be one with Mother, which I wouldn't

>mind at all, but then "I" wouldn't be around to care.In the meantime,

>language is one of the best means of communication, as far as I know,

>so personal pronouns come in handy.

>But then, Temba, I understand what you are saying of giving with

>expectation. That's why Mother emphasizes selfless service. My guess is

>that most people do seva because it makes them feel closer to the

>divine. I do believe that is one reason we are encouraged to dedicate

>our work, be it scrubbing floors or whatever, to God. It helps US focus

>on the divine. As Mother says, God doesn't need our help.

>When I used to work with kids, I used to feel that I often learned more

>from them, than them from me. It was a neat feeling. It's all about the

>connection between people. When that connection happens we are closer to

>feeling at one with each other.

>

>Jai Ma!

>Prasadini

>

>nierika wrote:

> >

> > Temba wrote:

> >

> > ...the more of what "I" wanted is what keeps us in bondage."I got

> > more from

> > giving".so now we may begin to give in order to recieve more,instead

> > of just

> > giving only for the joy of giving with no expectation of recieving

> > anything

> > in return.we may think. "oh yeah if i do seva,(which is giving)this

> > may get

> > me closer to AMMA etc.when we do seva with an open heart and the right

> > awaweness we are closer to AMMA THEN WE MAY REALIZE.

> >

> >

> > Dear Temba ~ I am concerned a bit that you are reading too much into

> > what

> > some people are innocently saying. If I say, for example, about my

> > Tarot and

> > other workshops, that "I" got as much out of it as "my" students, for

> > me, this

> > is a statement of wonder and gratitude, and the use of the word, "I,"

> > is for

> > convenience. I never did, nor would I, if I started doing them again,

> > think to

> > myself, "oh, I will do as many as I can so I can get the more out of

> > it than

> > I get." This would put me in the position of a cat chasing its own

>tail.

> >

> > We must have some way to refer to ourselves when we talk about our

> > experiences. Otherwise, who is writing this email? Who wrote the email

> > "I" am

> > responding to ... and ultimately, this would seem to turn into a

> > circle that would

> > cause a person to possibly question, "why am 'I' participating in

> > this digest

> > at all?"

> >

> > We come here because this is a satsang in cyberspace. For some of us,

> > it is

> > the only satsang available to us. I am very aware that Amma has said

> > we must

> > get rid of "I" and "mine," but I'm not sure She was referring to

> > conversations, which is what the digest is ... it is conversations

> > between "me" and "you,"

> > or between "me" and the group, or between some other "me" and another

> > person

> > or the group. Of course, we could all use a term such as "this child"

> > when

> > we are talking about ourselves or our experiences to get around the

> > problem of

> > seeming to sound egotistical, but if we are doing it just to get away

> > from

> > using the terms "I" and "mine," we really have not changed anything,

> > and it is

> > just subterfuge.

> >

> > When "I" read an email from anyone in the group, "I" don't make

> > anything out

> > of their use of the word, "I," when referring to their experience. "I"

> > realize it is a convenience and that it is not up to me to try to

> > figure out or

> > judge the use of the word, "I" by another person. And it is really

> > additionally

> > tiresome, literally, in terms of my health, to remember to keep using

> > quotation marks around the word, "I." So I pray we all remember that,

> > in sharing our

> > experiences, that we are each unique and in the sharing, others are

> > enriched, and that we not become overly worried about the use of

> > personal pronouns.

> > At Amma's feet ~ Linda

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha!

> >

> >

> >

> >

> > Mata amritanandamayi

> >

></gads?t=ms&k=Mata+amritanandamayi&w1=Mata+amritanandama\

yi&c=1&s=26&.sig=DYRmPW4tjbUZrNprNMY6xw>

> >

> >

> >

> > ------

> >

> >

> > * Visit your group "Ammachi

> > <Ammachi>" on the web.

> >

> > *

> > Ammachi

> > <Ammachi?subject=Un>

> >

> > * Terms of

> > Service <>.

> >

> >

> > ------

> >

>

 

_______________

Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!

http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...