Guest guest Posted August 5, 2005 Report Share Posted August 5, 2005 Avram wrote: Even so, they did throw a 50th birthday event for Her, when it so happened that She was already 51. Isn't that a tad incongruous? Don't you think if She knew, She would have had the event in the proper year? I find it a little embarrassing, myself. She was born as Sudhamani, at a certain date and time. It might not be important in itself, but with the high-profile birthday anniversary, it is unfortunate that it came out later that the year itself was incorrect. Dear Avram and all ~ this is another thread I have stayed out of because I know nothing. However I do know that in small villages today, just as in our own historic past in America, the exact dates of birth were not always recorded and so people relied on memory, a somewhat inconstant companion, for this information. I don't find this strange at all. At Amma's Feet ~ Linda Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted August 5, 2005 Report Share Posted August 5, 2005 Dear Avram, I think Amma "knows" perfectly well when She chose to incarnate into Her present body. In fact, Amma allowed Amritavarsham to happen only because Amma wanted a large set of people to gather together and pray for the world. An ashram resident told us ( before amritavarsham) that Amma had remarked that She was already 50 years old before amritavarsham. In the early years, Amma's b'day used to be celebrated according to the hindu astrological calender- that is on Krithika nakshatra day in the month of kanni( when the vedic calender puts the sun in virgo). This date used to change from year to year ( that is the gregorian calender date used to change). So on some years the karthika star would fall on oct 1st, sometimes on sept 26th , sometimes on sep 30th etc. As the crowds grew larger, this was confusing for many people. So the ashram decided to keep it fixed on a particular date. The date recorded was sept 27th in most books ( as you see sept 27th 1953 was also karthika nakshatra day) and Amma's parents did not note the particular year accurately.( this does not surprise me, as my own mother, grand ma and even some cousins are not sure of the exact year they were born). So sept 27th was accepted as the date- but even now, when some people say "oct 7th" is the day we are not sure.... but i did check the jyotish chart for the oct 7th 1952 date too and the chart is quite beautiful i should say. Amma Herself does not bother much about the date and time as i guess after all She is "Tyakta dig vastu kalaadi savavacheda rasaye"- ( one who has gone beyond limitations like time and space - from Her 108 names). For Amma it doesnt matter when you gather and pray to God - if you say this is Her "bday" and do it, well then OK. In fact there was a similar incident with Ramana Maharishi. Once a man wrote a book in which he had written various false stuff- like Sri Ramana got married and then ran away from home etc. All this stuff was false- as Ramana maharishi never married and left home when he was 17 years old. But the fun of the matter was the man actually took his manuscript, full of wrong details and got it BLESSED BY RAMANA MAHARISHI HIMSELF!!! Ramana Maharishi blessed the book. After some days, the other devotes recognized the error and came to Ramana and asked Him "Bhagavan, why did you bless the book when you knew the details were false?" To which came Ramana's classic reply " DO YOU THINK YOUR VERSION IS RIGHT?- THAT I BORN ON SUCH A SUCH A DAY AND CAME HERE WHEN I WAS 17. THAT STORY WHICH YOU THINK IS THE "REAL" BIOGRAPHY IS AS MUCH AN ILLUSION AS THE STORY THE MAN WROTE !!!!!!! " that is, for Ramana , even the "real" details of his life were false!- because he was never born nor did he die , nor was he ever embodied. Similarly i guess for Amma, when She knows that She is never born or never dies, when She knows that She is the formless reality behind all forms, it makes no difference as to when you celebrate Her "birthday". Finally- Amma's true and ONLY birthday is the day we open our hearts with Love. The day we cry for God and for our fellow man, is the day Amma is born in us. Actually in Seattle, ( jyotsna can correct me if I am wrong) - there was a question very similar to this one.. the question was "Amma what was your previous birth?" To which Amma replied " For Amma there is no such thing as birth. It is like going from one compartment( cabin) of a train to another. There is no such point as birth for Amma". Actually Swamiji was not satisfied with Her answer and tried to pin Her down. He said "Amma was Krishna", then he kept asking Her "thats right Mother, but what exact birth was that - the previous cabin?"-to which Amma again said " son, i told you, i dont have a specific birth ". After the Q&A session was over, i went and asked Swamiji "So swami you failed to pin Her down ".. to which Swamiji replied " I have never managed to find out the answer from Her about Her previous birth ". I initially thought that Amma evaded the isue- then it struck me that She was speaking the plain honest Truth! - in reality there IS NO SUCH THING AS A BIRTH FOR HER- so whats the point of asking the question? In repeatedly asking the question, we are expecting Amma to share our false visison- that we are the body and have a specific birth. But AMMA does not feel She is the body, so how can She answer the question ? Perhaps Her refusal to answer our question as to Her previous birth, and Her non committal attitude towards the "actual" date of Her birth IS the Answer- that She wants us to come to that level where there is no birth or death. where we see Her and ourselves as we really are- the Atman . Let us humbly bow down to the Mahatma, and not hastily judge the Mahatma. We cannot understand Her point of view. Hopefully, one day, by Her grace and our self effort- we shall understand Her point of view and stop asking this foolish question regd the birthday of One who was never born. bala nierika wrote: Avram wrote: Even so, they did throw a 50th birthday event for Her, when it so happened that She was already 51. Isn't that a tad incongruous? Don't you think if She knew, She would have had the event in the proper year? I find it a little embarrassing, myself. She was born as Sudhamani, at a certain date and time. It might not be important in itself, but with the high-profile birthday anniversary, it is unfortunate that it came out later that the year itself was incorrect. Dear Avram and all ~ this is another thread I have stayed out of because I know nothing. However I do know that in small villages today, just as in our own historic past in America, the exact dates of birth were not always recorded and so people relied on memory, a somewhat inconstant companion, for this information. I don't find this strange at all. At Amma's Feet ~ Linda Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha! Beliefs of hinduism Different religions beliefs Hinduism religion Ammachi Hinduism Visit your group "Ammachi" on the web. Ammachi Start your day with - make it your home page Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.