Digest Number 1646

[Guest guest]

In a message dated 8/5/2005 5:10:38 AM Eastern Standard Time,

Ammachi writes:

Message: 2

Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:29:37 -0700

Ardis Jackson <ardis1

Re: Digest Number 1645

 

I Love that. Her own birth.

::Even so, they did throw a 50th birthday event for Her, when it so happened

that She was already 51. Isn't that a tad incongruous? Don't you think if She

knew, She would have had the event in the proper year? I find it a little

embarrassing, myself. She was born as Sudhamani, at a certain date and time. It

might not be important in itself, but with the high-profile birthday

anniversary, it is unfortunate that it came out later that the year itself was

incorrect. that's just me. Avram

 

 

 

[Guest guest]

OM NAMAH SIVAYA

 

the real truth of the matter is Amma and all of us as well, we were

never born and we will never die so maybe it doesn't matter to Her.

 

time on one level exists and on another it doesn't. its perspective.

 

JAI MA

 

Ammachi, sprose1@a... wrote:

> In a message dated 8/5/2005 5:10:38 AM Eastern Standard Time,

> Ammachi writes:

> Message: 2

> Thu, 04 Aug 2005 18:29:37 -0700

> Ardis Jackson <ardis1@v...>

> Re: Digest Number 1645

>

> I Love that. Her own birth.

> ::Even so, they did throw a 50th birthday event for Her, when it

so happened

> that She was already 51. Isn't that a tad incongruous? Don't you

think if She

> knew, She would have had the event in the proper year? I find it

a little

> embarrassing, myself. She was born as Sudhamani, at a certain date

and time. It

> might not be important in itself, but with the high-profile

birthday

> anniversary, it is unfortunate that it came out later that the

year itself was

> incorrect. that's just me. Avram

>

>

>