From the horse's mouth....not over yet!!! OH NOOO!! not over yet?

[Guest guest]

Ammachi, "childofdevi" <childofdevi> wrote:

> Vishwanathji,

>

> I have a theory as to why the DOB of Sep 27 1953 has validity inspite

> of it not being Amma's birthday. Once I spit it out, I think you will

> appreciate it and agree that Sep 27 should be the right date (I have

> a tough time believing otherwise, since I as well as others have a

> strong synastry with the Sep 27 date)

 

Om Amrtesvaryai Namah!!

 

Namaskarams Yogaman

 

i am one of those of whom you speak that has a strong synastry with the

Sept 27 1953 date...and that's one of the reasons i was so

upset....cause i had been believing for about 6 years that Amma's birth

date WAS the 27 Sept....and i had done quite a bit of work on seeing

how i am related to Her....i could see that there was a strong

connection...at least in my own deluded mind!!!

 

i haven't really even checked out the new improved version of Oct

7...who knows there might be a good connection there too...but it'll

definitely be DIFFERENT somewhat due to the different placements of

planets...for all i know it might be even a stronger connection...i

haven't really looked as i said...was too upset with the

change..."What!! and they never told ME???!!!"

 

anyways, probably one of the best ways to get those significant events

would be to read or reread the biography of Amma for the early

years...and (probably) look through the websites for more recent

events...like getting the Hinduism Today "Hindu of the Year" award in

1993, getting the Gandhi King Peace award more recently, being one of

the three leaders of the Hindu Faith at the 1993 World Parliament of

Religions...(along with Sivaya Subramuniyaswamiji, and Swami

Chinmayanandaji (i believe))

 

She started going abroad in 1987 to America i think...

 

She was one of the major speakers at the UN Millenium conference in

2000 i think...and then there was a further Parliament of Religions

that took place in Spain, in which She was a major presenter.

 

The fire at San Ramon happened on Tuesday June 13 2000 (if i remember

it correctly..yep i looked at my computer calendar and that's the date)

The new years before that Amma had been asking all Her devotees to

regularly chant the Peace Mantra.."Om Lokah Samastah Sukhino Bhavantu!"

 

If you have a copy of the biography of Amma, that would help a lot for

the earlier years.....or maybe one of the other books like "Amma

Healing the Heart of the World"....that might also give some

interesting dates...i haven't looked though, since i read it a few

years ago.

 

i wonder just what you are getting at, though, dear brother....you've

almost got me squirming on the edge of my seat...."what's He up to'???

 

In Mother's Love,

and in Her Service,

as ever,

 

visvanathan

 

Om Amrtesvaryai Namah!

[Guest guest]

>

> If you have a copy of the biography of Amma, that would help a lot

for

> the earlier years.....or maybe one of the other books like "Amma

> Healing the Heart of the World"....that might also give some

> interesting dates...i haven't looked though, since i read it a few

> years ago.

>

> i wonder just what you are getting at, though, dear brother....you've

> almost got me squirming on the edge of my seat...."what's He up to'???

>

 

Vishwanathji,

 

LOL. No I am not making up this up, it might very well be that Amma was

born on 1952, but still the horoscope using the birthdate of 1953 is

the one that fits her. YES this is possible under some conditions

especially for a Mahatma.[ I will explain later or until I have some

more proof of this]

 

Why dont you take a look at the 1952 chart and see if it correlates

with Amma's life and which one of the two dates is the better one.

 

There were some arguments about how a wrong date of birth may hold for

many Indian people - while this may be perfectly OK for the average

person, I think this is not acceptable when Amma is omniscient(we all

have sufficient evidence of this so as not to dispute it) and millions

of people are celebrating her birthday. When they magically arrived at

the Sep 27 birthday, I am sure that they would have at least checked

with Amma on this. So I humbly submit that there must be some other

reason for this.

 

-yogaman

 

ps. unfortunately I dont have any of my Amma books with me right now,

any alternate source of dates would be greatly welcomed.

[Guest guest]

> Why dont you take a look at the 1952 chart and see if it correlates

> with Amma's life and which one of the two dates is the better one.

>

 

OM Amrtesvaryai Namah!!

 

Namaskarams Yogaman!

 

so...just how many dates would you be needing to establish or

disprove your theory? i did pass you some of the dates that i know

of...but perhaps they need to be more precise...

 

also, it will be very hard to compare the events in Amma's life with

her "new" birth chart, until we can discover what TIME it was when

Amma was born...whether it was still the 9:09 AM time or

what...otherwise we shall not know where the lagna is...nor will we

know the vimshottari dashas...which are critical to know for timing

events....

 

in Amma's Love

and in Her Service

as ever,

 

visvanathan

as ever

[Guest guest]

Viswanathanji,

 

I will need 20-30 events at the very least. For this analysis I do

not use Vimshottari - solar progressions and transit to natal hits

(these generally have pinpoint accuracy for specific events; not

knowing the time is not an issue since over the whole day most

planets will not change places, except maybe for the moon).

 

 

Hmm. Yes you are right, it will be hard to study 1952 - without the

birth time using VD... not sure what to do there.

 

-yogaman

Ammachi, "kasi_visvanath"

<kasi_visvanath> wrote:

> > Why dont you take a look at the 1952 chart and see if it

correlates

> > with Amma's life and which one of the two dates is the better one.

> >

>

> OM Amrtesvaryai Namah!!

>

> Namaskarams Yogaman!

>

> so...just how many dates would you be needing to establish or

> disprove your theory? i did pass you some of the dates that i know

> of...but perhaps they need to be more precise...

>

> also, it will be very hard to compare the events in Amma's life

with

> her "new" birth chart, until we can discover what TIME it was when

> Amma was born...whether it was still the 9:09 AM time or

> what...otherwise we shall not know where the lagna is...nor will we

> know the vimshottari dashas...which are critical to know for timing

> events....

>

> in Amma's Love

> and in Her Service

> as ever,

>

> visvanathan

> as ever