Guest guest Posted July 17, 2005 Report Share Posted July 17, 2005 Yogaman wrote: > So what is the moral of the story - that clearly this shows that stars > do not have much relevance to Amma's life. How can She who controls the > planets be subject to their influence - this is my humble suggestion Ditto Yogaman..... She, who controls the planets, is having a hoot as her doubting children discuss her birthdate. amritavarshini On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 05:20 PM, childofdevi wrote: > Viswanathanji and Jyothsnaji, > Oct 2 is still not a bad day to be born - three planets in own house > even without knowing the time. It is still not as good as Sep 27 1953 > though. > ). > -yogaman > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted July 18, 2005 Report Share Posted July 18, 2005 Ammachi, "B.Edmonds" <edmondsb@i...> wrote: > "She, who controls the planets, is having a hoot as her doubting children discuss her birthdate." Jai Maa! My sentiments exactly! :<) Aum Amriteswaryai Namaha, muktimaa Yogaman wrote: > > So what is the moral of the story - that clearly this shows that stars > > do not have much relevance to Amma's life. How can She who controls the > > planets be subject to their influence - this is my humble suggestion > > Ditto Yogaman..... > > She, who controls the planets, is having a hoot as her doubting > children discuss her birthdate. > > amritavarshini > > On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 05:20 PM, childofdevi wrote: > > > Viswanathanji and Jyothsnaji, > > Oct 2 is still not a bad day to be born - three planets in own house > > even without knowing the time. It is still not as good as Sep 27 1953 > > though. > > ). > > -yogaman > > > > > > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.