Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

posts that aren't about Amma

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Om Namah Shivaya, all -

I feel impelled to say something about the posts like

the one below. I do not know what this directly has

to do with Amma. I have admittedly been annoyed by

these posts, which may be interesting I'm sure to some,

but there are 1) very long, giving us long passages to

some texts that may be of interest to some, but I personally

would rather not have them posted here 2) seem to be

continually promoting another group, which I find

annoying and somewhat offensive 3) make reading the

daily digest very frustrating for me, as I have to scroll

down through the whole thing to get to the other posts, and

4) don't have much to do with Amma as far as I'm concerned.

 

Again, this is just my point of view, but I personally would

rather not see posts such as these on this list. I

to this list to share Amma's wisdom, learn from her and

her other devotees, and hear stories about experiences

with Amma.

Blessings,

Achintya

- Message: 1

Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:19:58 -0700 (PDT)

R Dasa <holynames12

The Subterranean Heavenly Planets

 

Please join our :

guru_gauranga

 

Canto 5: The Creative ImpetusChapter 24: The Subterranean Heavenly Planets

Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Srimad Bhagavatam

 

SB 5.24 Summary

 

SB 5.24.1: Sri Sukadeva Gosvami said: My dear King, some historians, the

speakers of the Puranas, say that 10,000 yojanas [80,000 miles] below the

sun is the planet known as Rahu, which moves like one of the stars. The

presiding deity of that planet, who is the son of Simhika, is the most

abominable of all asuras, but although he is completely unfit to assume the

position of a demigod or planetary deity, he has achieved that position by

the grace of the Supreme Personality of Godhead. Later I shall speak further

about him.

 

etc. etc. etc.

-------------

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree there. I have made a mention of it in previous posts that this be about

AMMA and only AMMA. Any thing else will divert us from the teachings of AMMA.

I'm sure that there are many wonderful sites out there on other's teachings and

such but it will only divert us from what AMMA is giving us. This is a room

about AMMACHI the Divine Mother so let the thoughts and ideas and feelings and

anything else be of AMMA. I don't care if such and such a site is about this

great teacher or the words spoken by such and such is wonderful the fact is that

this room is about AMMA .And as such let us keep it this way.

 

Namaste

Alexander

 

PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this room that persist in

advertising other's thoughts or ideas or beliefs.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namah Shivaya,

 

Although I feel comfortable with a wider latitude of spiritual posts than

Alexander, even I would also prefer that these posts stop. (I haven't paid too

much attention, but are they associated with Krishna Consciousness?). I learn

from a variety of sources, and even Amma says that we should stay with our own

religions. But, the sender may not realize that one of Amma's swamis recently

said if we go to another Guru for help, that's like being unfaithful in a

marriage. These posts appear to be encouraging that kind of unfaithfulness.

So, I am sincerely requesting the sender to discontinue these posts.

 

Thank you in advance for your understanding and cooperation.

 

Sincerely,

 

Sweta

 

WayOfEagle2 <WayOfEagle2 wrote:

I agree there. I have made a mention of it in previous posts that this be about

AMMA and only AMMA. Any thing else will divert us from the teachings of AMMA.

I'm sure that there are many wonderful sites out there on other's teachings and

such but it will only divert us from what AMMA is giving us. This is a room

about AMMACHI the Divine Mother so let the thoughts and ideas and feelings and

anything else be of AMMA. I don't care if such and such a site is about this

great teacher or the words spoken by such and such is wonderful the fact is that

this room is about AMMA .And as such let us keep it this way.

 

Namaste

Alexander

 

PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this room that persist in

advertising other's thoughts or ideas or beliefs.

 

 

 

 

 

Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha!

 

 

Ammachi/

 

Ammachi

 

 

 

 

 

 

vote. - Register online to vote today!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The example you have forwarded is from Vaishnava texts, and ISKCON

versions in particular. While Ammachi is very fond of Krishna (she used

to do Krishna Bhava evenings many years ago), I prefer to read about what

Amma herself has to say about Hinduism, thank you.

 

-- Len/ Kalipadma

 

 

On Mon, 13 Sep 2004 16:57:55 -0700 "Connie Habash"

<Connie writes:

> Om Namah Shivaya, all -

> I feel impelled to say something about the posts like

> the one below. I do not know what this directly has

> to do with Amma. I have admittedly been annoyed by

> these posts, which may be interesting I'm sure to some,

> but there are 1) very long, giving us long passages to

> some texts that may be of interest to some, but I personally

> would rather not have them posted here 2) seem to be

> continually promoting another group, which I find

> annoying and somewhat offensive 3) make reading the

> daily digest very frustrating for me, as I have to scroll

> down through the whole thing to get to the other posts, and

> 4) don't have much to do with Amma as far as I'm concerned.

>

> Again, this is just my point of view, but I personally would

> rather not see posts such as these on this list. I

> to this list to share Amma's wisdom, learn from her and

> her other devotees, and hear stories about experiences

> with Amma.

> Blessings,

> Achintya

> - Message: 1

> Sat, 11 Sep 2004 22:19:58 -0700 (PDT)

> R Dasa <holynames12

> The Subterranean Heavenly Planets

>

> Please join our :

> guru_gauranga

>

> Canto 5: The Creative ImpetusChapter 24: The Subterranean Heavenly

> Planets

> Bhaktivedanta VedaBase: Srimad Bhagavatam

>

> SB 5.24 Summary

>

> SB 5.24.1: Sri Sukadeva Gosvami said: My dear King, some historians,

> the

> speakers of the Puranas, say that 10,000 yojanas [80,000 miles]

> below the

> sun is the planet known as Rahu, which moves like one of the stars.

>

 

 

______________

Get your name as your email address.

Includes spam protection, 1GB storage, no ads and more

Only $1.99/ month - visit http://www.mysite.com/name today!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

>

> Although I feel comfortable with a wider latitude of

> spiritual posts than Alexander, even I would also

> prefer that these posts stop. (I haven't paid too

> much attention, but are they associated with Krishna

> Consciousness?).

 

I would also like to see the long posts quoting

chapter and verse of Prabhupada's ISKCON texts stop.

Remember, some of us have slow dial-up connections,

obsolete molasses-slow computers, or even no computers

of our own and have limited time to read e-mail at

internet cafes or public libraries. I have nothing

against Hare Krishna or other non-Amma teachings per

se, but such postings should be limited to one or two

short paragraphs and a link to the full text.

 

> PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> or ideas or beliefs.

>

 

As co-moderator, I wouldn't go so far as to ban

postings of non-Amma-related thoughts, ideas or

beliefs (can you say "thought police"? I knew you

could!). But ads for commercial websites, products,

or profit-making schemes are spam, and anyone posting

such messages will be bounced from this group in a

heartbeat.

 

Keval

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I said this it was a poor choice of words with no intention whatever of not

having different spiritual thoughts and ideas mutually discussed for there is

truth in other's also.

> PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> or ideas or beliefs.

 

My reason for basically saying that is for those that persist on and on to

inscribe their thoughts on one without regards to other's and just carry on like

their's is the only path. Having this in mind my thoughts were on Amma's

teachings where she had mentioned that one who has a Guru should follow the Guru

for if we look for other Guru's then we will become confused. Having followed

Sathya Sai Baba, Karunamayi, and Anandi Ma I should know. Though the teachings

are the same there is it not better to think of one's Guru and be one pointed

there? Expression of other's thoight's and ideas I welcome. As I said before for

what I said it was a poor choice of words. It was meant only for those that

persist in hammering their thoughts and beleifs unto one.

 

Namaste

Alexander

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Namah Shivaya,

 

A coworker of mine is part of the Krishna Consciousness movement. He stated

that Krishna is the highest form of God to worship and if a person thinks of

Krishna at the moment of death, then that person will go to the highest plane.

Doesn't Amma teach that all true religions are leading us to go to the same

"place?" My coworker also said Shiva is a just demi-god, and that Christ lives

on a spiritually lower planet than Krishna. Whether or not these statements are

part of that organization's official dogma, I don't know. If so, then the

sender is most likely trying to help us and is truely desiring our highest good.

 

But, if the sender is trying to convert us, I want him/her to know I think Amma

said it's a form of violence to try to convert people from their religions to

different one. Since Amma is the best teacher for me, it's easy for me to think

She would be best for everyone. But, there was a point when I wouldn't have

been ready for Amma. I feel that different religions are stepping stones to

God, and that it might be best for each us to use a different one, and possibly

many different ones during a lifetime.

 

WayOfEagle2 <WayOfEagle2 wrote:

When I said this it was a poor choice of words with no intention whatever of not

having different spiritual thoughts and ideas mutually discussed for there is

truth in other's also.

> PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> or ideas or beliefs.

 

My reason for basically saying that is for those that persist on and on to

inscribe their thoughts on one without regards to other's and just carry on like

their's is the only path. Having this in mind my thoughts were on Amma's

teachings where she had mentioned that one who has a Guru should follow the Guru

for if we look for other Guru's then we will become confused. Having followed

Sathya Sai Baba, Karunamayi, and Anandi Ma I should know. Though the teachings

are the same there is it not better to think of one's Guru and be one pointed

there? Expression of other's thoight's and ideas I welcome. As I said before for

what I said it was a poor choice of words. It was meant only for those that

persist in hammering their thoughts and beleifs unto one.

 

Namaste

Alexander

 

 

 

 

 

Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha!

 

 

Ammachi/

 

Ammachi

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New and Improved Mail - Send 10MB messages!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ammachi, Mike Brooker <patria1818> wrote:

> >

> As co-moderator, I wouldn't go so far as to ban

> postings of non-Amma-related thoughts, ideas or

> beliefs (can you say "thought police"? I knew you

> could!).

> Keval

 

Keval / Peter,

 

just a suggestion... can you put such post-ers under "moderated" so

that their posts can be moderated by you before being released to

the group? As I am a moderator of another group, I know groups

allows this feature.

 

I am not saying that you DO this, I am only saying that's an option

too.... the decision is Peter's and/or yours.

 

Thanks

Manoj

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was my understanding that the moderator is to keeep this an Amma

site and not have postings of Hare Krishna or other teachings unless

they are somehow related obviously to Mother. I know everything is

related to Amma but I mean obviously. Isnt it?

Am i off- it is possible, as I usually am.

In Amma's

Ambujam

Ammachi, Mike Brooker <patria1818> wrote:

> >

I have nothing

> against Hare Krishna or other non-Amma teachings per

> se, but such postings should be limited to one or two

> short paragraphs and a link to the full text.

>

> > PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> > room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> > or ideas or beliefs.

> >

>

> As co-moderator, I wouldn't go so far as to ban

> postings of non-Amma-related thoughts, ideas or

> beliefs (can you say "thought police"? I knew you

> could!). But ads for commercial websites, products,

> or profit-making schemes are spam, and anyone posting

> such messages will be bounced from this group in a

> heartbeat.

>

> Keval

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree completely, Keval. Amma herself has never said only to give

to Amma-related charities, nor has she said only to read Amma-spoken

dharma. I think a reasonable amount of discrimination applies here,

not rigid fundamentalism.

 

namaste,

Jim / Pranav

 

Ammachi, Mike Brooker <patria1818> wrote:

> >

> > Although I feel comfortable with a wider latitude of

> > spiritual posts than Alexander, even I would also

> > prefer that these posts stop. (I haven't paid too

> > much attention, but are they associated with Krishna

> > Consciousness?).

>

> I would also like to see the long posts quoting

> chapter and verse of Prabhupada's ISKCON texts stop.

> Remember, some of us have slow dial-up connections,

> obsolete molasses-slow computers, or even no computers

> of our own and have limited time to read e-mail at

> internet cafes or public libraries. I have nothing

> against Hare Krishna or other non-Amma teachings per

> se, but such postings should be limited to one or two

> short paragraphs and a link to the full text.

>

> > PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> > room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> > or ideas or beliefs.

> >

>

> As co-moderator, I wouldn't go so far as to ban

> postings of non-Amma-related thoughts, ideas or

> beliefs (can you say "thought police"? I knew you

> could!). But ads for commercial websites, products,

> or profit-making schemes are spam, and anyone posting

> such messages will be bounced from this group in a

> heartbeat.

>

> Keval

>

>

>

>

>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

P.S. - the one thing I wish could be changed is the constant barrage

of Personals ads. Other groups seem to have different subject

matter. Maybe there's something in the group settings that tells

what the subject matter is, e.g., if it says something

about "people meeting other people" simply defaults to

spamming members about meeting their dream date?

 

Ammachi, "Jim Butler" <acujames> wrote:

> Agree completely, Keval. Amma herself has never said only to give

> to Amma-related charities, nor has she said only to read Amma-

spoken

> dharma. I think a reasonable amount of discrimination applies

here,

> not rigid fundamentalism.

>

> namaste,

> Jim / Pranav

>

> Ammachi, Mike Brooker <patria1818>

wrote:

> > >

> > > Although I feel comfortable with a wider latitude of

> > > spiritual posts than Alexander, even I would also

> > > prefer that these posts stop. (I haven't paid too

> > > much attention, but are they associated with Krishna

> > > Consciousness?).

> >

> > I would also like to see the long posts quoting

> > chapter and verse of Prabhupada's ISKCON texts stop.

> > Remember, some of us have slow dial-up connections,

> > obsolete molasses-slow computers, or even no computers

> > of our own and have limited time to read e-mail at

> > internet cafes or public libraries. I have nothing

> > against Hare Krishna or other non-Amma teachings per

> > se, but such postings should be limited to one or two

> > short paragraphs and a link to the full text.

> >

> > > PS .. I see no problem in BANNING those from this

> > > room that persist in advertising other's thoughts

> > > or ideas or beliefs.

> > >

> >

> > As co-moderator, I wouldn't go so far as to ban

> > postings of non-Amma-related thoughts, ideas or

> > beliefs (can you say "thought police"? I knew you

> > could!). But ads for commercial websites, products,

> > or profit-making schemes are spam, and anyone posting

> > such messages will be bounced from this group in a

> > heartbeat.

> >

> > Keval

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...