Guest guest Posted December 11, 2003 Report Share Posted December 11, 2003 Namaste Devotees! When I speak about "purported non-dualists", I am most certainly NOT speaking about Ramana Maharshi or other true masters. I myself absolutely love this path. One of my favorite scriptures is Tripura Rahasya, a classic of non-dualism, which I highly recommend. What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and It is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types of manipulation and mind control. Have you ever heard of Rama, a so called non-dualist who had his devotees give him a portion of their pay checks and slept with many of his female devotees? All under the guise of Non-dualism. Easy enlightenment. Even Amma calls this phony parrot like Vedatins philosophers "hypocrites." When we are under the sway of our Vasanas and then declare to our friends "I am enlightened" really this is silly. Yet this is a VERY POPULAR PRACTICE in the spiritual community. Amma said that you can count the number of realized souls on your fingers...THAT IS NOT VERY MANY. There is a web site called Sarlos guru ratings, Mr. Sarlo is a non- dualist of the new american type of non-dualist. Ammachi and Shirdi Sai Baba get 2.5 out of five points, while Rajanessh, the famous do want you want non-dualist gets five out of five, the highest rating. Does that make sense to you? The non-dualists who chat on this website all consider themselves to be enlightened. In fact one of them posted to me that "all is one" therefore getting a hug from the blockbuster video clerk is the same as getting a hug from Ammachi. They do not like gurus who they consider to be "authoritarian". They prefer a do what you like whenever you want, act natural approach to life. There is a non-dualist tantra sex sharing and dating web site. This is a REAL pitfall for new, young and impressionable spiritually inclined people. My experience in life has taught me that until make efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non-stealing, honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. I consider myself to be a non-dualist, but a non-dualist with just a bit of discrimination. When I even watch any of the beautiful videos of Ramana Maharshi...I begin to feel like I swimming in his enlightened state..I just notice that I personally do not maintain that state 24 -7.!! Anyway ...LOVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT TO ALL... Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 11, 2003 Report Share Posted December 11, 2003 - ckeniley2003 Ammachi Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:36 PM Non-dualism ,easy enlightenment You guys are really missing my point! Namaste Chris and Others, I am trying hard to hear you with an open mind and heart, but some of the global comments are making me uncomfortable. I appreciate the validity of several of your issues - false masters/gurus would indeed present a huge problem for those who have followed in good faith, for example - and I always value other viewpoints against which I can challenge the validity of my own beliefs. Thanks for your effort to clarify. From the heart, Snehalata Namaste Devotees! When I speak about "purported non-dualists", I am most certainly NOT speaking about Ramana Maharshi or other true masters. I myself absolutely love this path. One of my favorite scriptures is Tripura Rahasya, a classic of non-dualism, which I highly recommend. What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and It is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types of manipulation and mind control. Have you ever heard of Rama, a so called non-dualist who had his devotees give him a portion of their pay checks and slept with many of his female devotees? All under the guise of Non-dualism. Easy enlightenment. Even Amma calls this phony parrot like Vedatins philosophers "hypocrites." When we are under the sway of our Vasanas and then declare to our friends "I am enlightened" really this is silly. Yet this is a VERY POPULAR PRACTICE in the spiritual community. Amma said that you can count the number of realized souls on your fingers...THAT IS NOT VERY MANY. There is a web site called Sarlos guru ratings, Mr. Sarlo is a non- dualist of the new american type of non-dualist. Ammachi and Shirdi Sai Baba get 2.5 out of five points, while Rajanessh, the famous do want you want non-dualist gets five out of five, the highest rating. Does that make sense to you? The non-dualists who chat on this website all consider themselves to be enlightened. In fact one of them posted to me that "all is one" therefore getting a hug from the blockbuster video clerk is the same as getting a hug from Ammachi. They do not like gurus who they consider to be "authoritarian". They prefer a do what you like whenever you want, act natural approach to life. There is a non-dualist tantra sex sharing and dating web site. This is a REAL pitfall for new, young and impressionable spiritually inclined people. My experience in life has taught me that until make efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non-stealing, honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. I consider myself to be a non-dualist, but a non-dualist with just a bit of discrimination. When I even watch any of the beautiful videos of Ramana Maharshi...I begin to feel like I swimming in his enlightened state..I just notice that I personally do not maintain that state 24 -7.!! Anyway ...LOVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT TO ALL... Chris Sponsor Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha! Ammachi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Namah Sivaya, I struggled against such tendencies for nearly a decade and can attest that this is a very detrimental mindset to have. I found that because the tapas of sadhana was sooo difficult, I turned to pseudo-Advaitic "teachings" that promoted this perspective as an excuse to abandon my spiritual practice! The only way I could be free of the guilt and self-consciousness associated with indulging in my vasanas was by aligning myself with the belief that sadhana was not necessary. I never thought that I was enlightened, but felt that "if God wanted this body-mind to be more loving/kind, He would have created it with those qualities, etc. (!!!)". I alternated between bhoga-tyaga (indulgence and renunciation) for eighteen years, largely due to this ego-fabricated philosophy. This created a huge gulf between myself and Amma, and if it were not for Her infinite patience and compassion, I would have remained stuck in that belief system for lifetimes! At Amma's lotus feet, Kirsten Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Ammachi, "ckeniley2003" <ckeniley2003> wrote: .... > What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that > one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- > dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and I wouldn't call them pseudo-nondualists, any more than I would call a bhakta (devotee) pseudo because he says that all happens according to the good God's will and grace, even when he acts with guilt, regret, fear or anger. .... > It > is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are > enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE > of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from > tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types > of manipulation and mind control. Again, this is not confined to non-dualists. Look at all the 'cults', TV preachers etc. .... > My experience in life has taught me that until make > efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters > suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non-stealing, > honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic > lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to > feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. > > Chris There are many who claim to have felt the grace of Rajneesh -- who are we to say what the only true path is? The label of hypocrisy is applied disproportionately often to non-dualists among Amma's children. Vallath Nandakumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Hari OM! OM Amriteswariye Namaha! Blessed Ones, Before critizing any of the philosophy or any of the system, we should know about that system perfectly! otherwise criticism will be a blind criticism. If We are saying that Advaita, (non-dualist) are pseudo after studying the Prasthanna traya, like Srimad Bhagwad Geetha, Upanishads and Brahmasutra under a qualified teacher,then it is a different matter,(because then we will not just hit in the dark!) otherwise please keep our ignorance inside, do not even give suggestions about it. Because it is as simple as we are not qualified for that. There are always pseudo people in this world, we cannot generalize that all the Swamis and non-dualists are like that, Even for Bhagwan Sri Krishna, there was one pseudo, do you know who it is he is Poundraka.. So, never do only arguments and criticism without properly studying, if we really learn things, then all our doubts and arguments go away. To get the qualifications like "niyamas" or habits of disciplne non- stealing, honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic lifestyle, only devotion alone will not help, because we are ignorant, so we need to study, we need to do Sadhana, and we need to discuss the spiritual text under the guidance of a GURU Like Amma. Bhakthi and Jnana Both are required for the removal of our ignorance. Even if you do Yama, Niyama, Patanjali and all that, only by the Grace you get the qualification to have Self Knowledge. And another thing, please do not compare ourselves with AMMA. Please Please Please, everybody cannot like become Amma. She is GOD incarnate Parasakthi.(eventhough everybody already is in their real form! but ignorant of it) Hope this kind of unnecessary arguments are avoided, for our progress. With Love & OM! OM Amriteswariye Namaha! OM Nama Shivaya! Ammachi, "vallathnkumar" <vallathn@h...> wrote: > Ammachi, "ckeniley2003" <ckeniley2003> wrote: > ... > > What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that > > one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- > > dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and > > I wouldn't call them pseudo-nondualists, any more than I would > call a bhakta (devotee) pseudo because he says that all happens > according to the good God's will and grace, even when he acts with > guilt, regret, fear or anger. > ... > > It > > is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are > > enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE > > of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from > > tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types > > of manipulation and mind control. > > Again, this is not confined to non-dualists. Look at all the > 'cults', TV preachers etc. > > ... > > > My experience in life has taught me that until make > > efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters > > suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non- stealing, > > honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic > > lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to > > feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. > > > > Chris > > There are many who claim to have felt the grace of Rajneesh -- > who are we to say what the only true path is? > > The label of hypocrisy is applied disproportionately often > to non-dualists among Amma's children. > > Vallath Nandakumar Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 - Krishna Prasad Ammachi Friday, December 12, 2003 4:00 PM Re: Non-dualism ,easy enlightenment You guys are really missing my point! Krishna, SO beautifully said. I had been tempted to respond once more and had already decided to let Mother answer the questions for me when She is ready to do so - I accept you suggestion and am bowing out of further comments on this thread. I also really appreciated your reminder that Amma is, literally, God incarnate. When I stop and give that fact serious consideration, the whole of our Divine Mother quite literally brings me to my knees. Namaste, Snehalata PS Thank you all so much; the continued love and support here is a life line that I value dearly. Hari OM! OM Amriteswariye Namaha! Blessed Ones, Before critizing any of the philosophy or any of the system, we should know about that system perfectly! otherwise criticism will be a blind criticism. If We are saying that Advaita, (non-dualist) are pseudo after studying the Prasthanna traya, like Srimad Bhagwad Geetha, Upanishads and Brahmasutra under a qualified teacher,then it is a different matter,(because then we will not just hit in the dark!) otherwise please keep our ignorance inside, do not even give suggestions about it. Because it is as simple as we are not qualified for that. There are always pseudo people in this world, we cannot generalize that all the Swamis and non-dualists are like that, Even for Bhagwan Sri Krishna, there was one pseudo, do you know who it is he is Poundraka.. So, never do only arguments and criticism without properly studying, if we really learn things, then all our doubts and arguments go away. To get the qualifications like "niyamas" or habits of disciplne non- stealing, honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic lifestyle, only devotion alone will not help, because we are ignorant, so we need to study, we need to do Sadhana, and we need to discuss the spiritual text under the guidance of a GURU Like Amma. Bhakthi and Jnana Both are required for the removal of our ignorance. Even if you do Yama, Niyama, Patanjali and all that, only by the Grace you get the qualification to have Self Knowledge. And another thing, please do not compare ourselves with AMMA. Please Please Please, everybody cannot like become Amma. She is GOD incarnate Parasakthi.(eventhough everybody already is in their real form! but ignorant of it) Hope this kind of unnecessary arguments are avoided, for our progress. With Love & OM! OM Amriteswariye Namaha! OM Nama Shivaya! Ammachi, "vallathnkumar" <vallathn@h...> wrote: > Ammachi, "ckeniley2003" <ckeniley2003> wrote: > ... > > What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that > > one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- > > dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and > > I wouldn't call them pseudo-nondualists, any more than I would > call a bhakta (devotee) pseudo because he says that all happens > according to the good God's will and grace, even when he acts with > guilt, regret, fear or anger. > ... > > It > > is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are > > enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE > > of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from > > tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types > > of manipulation and mind control. > > Again, this is not confined to non-dualists. Look at all the > 'cults', TV preachers etc. > > ... > > > My experience in life has taught me that until make > > efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters > > suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non- stealing, > > honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic > > lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to > > feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. > > > > Chris > > There are many who claim to have felt the grace of Rajneesh -- > who are we to say what the only true path is? > > The label of hypocrisy is applied disproportionately often > to non-dualists among Amma's children. > > Vallath Nandakumar Sponsor Aum Amriteswarayai Namaha! Ammachi Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 12, 2003 Report Share Posted December 12, 2003 Dear Brothers and Sisters, I sincerely apologize if my recent post in this thread contained wording that was considered offensive. I meant no criticism of others, only of my own ego. I should have clarified that the pseudo-Advaitic philosophy I was referring to was entirely based upon my own manufactured ideas and not that of a particular teacher. Please forgive me for any harm caused by my statements. Thank you, Krishna Prasad, for bringing this to my attention and for the wonderful reminder of our need to find a balance between jnana and bhakti. Your fallen servant, Kirsten Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 16, 2003 Report Share Posted December 16, 2003 OM! Dear Chris, I read your post with great interest. I struggled for many years with the paradox of Advaitic teachings. So many masters say that you are That right now, that if you could attain to anything you are not right now, it is worthless. Yet, when I would accept that I am That life could still be very miserable. Later I began to see what was going on. Poonjaji was one that would tell you that you are That now, that you do not even need to meditate. His statement was kind of a trick (emphasis on "kind"). I feel that his uncle, Swami Rama Tirtha, was less "tricky". Rama Tirtha taught that the Self is the EASIEST thing to Realize because IT IS ALWAYS REALIZED. The problem is, he said, was to get rid of those things that cause us suffering. That is the hard part. It is like this: someone once asked Swami Muktananda that if everything is God, could he not do anything he wanted? Muktananda replied that he could, but that he would have to take the consequences, the results, of all that he did as God too. Upasani Baba Maharaj said that one could attain God by doing all those things that bring suffering to you, BUT ONLY IF YOU DO NOT IN THE LEAST RESIST THAT SUFFERING, THAT IF A SIMPLE 'O GOD' SLIPPED OUT OF YOUR MOUTH JUST ONCE, ALL THE YEARS OF THIS SADHANA WOULD BE LOST. Many of the Neoadvaitins are in for a sorry surprise. Perhaps they have found Gurus they deserve. A Neoadvaitin might say, "Oh, boy, all happens by the Will of God. Now I don't have to brush my teeth anymore!" Years later when his teeth are all rotten and causing him great pain, his Guru will simply tell him, that that too is the Will of God! But I'm sure that the Neoadvaitin Gurus serve a good purpose: at least they get people started on the Path to Realization, people who never would have gotten on it for a long time. Om Sai! Umesh Ammachi, "ckeniley2003" <ckeniley2003> wrote: > Namaste Devotees! > > When I speak about "purported non-dualists", I am most certainly NOT > speaking about Ramana Maharshi or other true masters. I myself > absolutely love this path. One of my favorite scriptures is Tripura > Rahasya, a classic of non-dualism, which I highly recommend. > > What I am talking about: Using non-dualism as a means to declare that > one is enlightened WHEN THEY MOST DEFINITELY ARE NOT. The psuedo non- > dualist go about saying all is Brahman, we are all enlightened and It > is all a matter of your thinking...if you think you are > enlightened...you are. This philosophy is the basis for an ABUNDANCE > of charlatans who run weekend workshops that run the gammat from > tantra group sex to six thousand dollars for a mantra, to all types > of manipulation and mind control. Have you ever heard of Rama, a so > called non-dualist who had his devotees give him a portion of their > pay checks and slept with many of his female devotees? All under the > guise of Non-dualism. Easy enlightenment. Even Amma calls this phony > parrot like Vedatins philosophers "hypocrites." When we are under the > sway of our Vasanas and then declare to our friends "I am > enlightened" really this is silly. Yet this is a VERY POPULAR > PRACTICE in the spiritual community. Amma said that you can count the > number of realized souls on your fingers...THAT IS NOT VERY MANY. > > There is a web site called Sarlos guru ratings, Mr. Sarlo is a non- > dualist of the new american type of non-dualist. Ammachi and Shirdi > Sai Baba get 2.5 out of five points, while Rajanessh, the famous do > want you want non-dualist gets five out of five, the highest rating. > Does that make sense to you? The non-dualists who chat on this > website all consider themselves to be enlightened. In fact one of > them posted to me that "all is one" therefore getting a hug from the > blockbuster video clerk is the same as getting a hug from Ammachi. > > They do not like gurus who they consider to be "authoritarian". They > prefer a do what you like whenever you want, act natural approach to > life. There is a non-dualist tantra sex sharing and dating web site. > > This is a REAL pitfall for new, young and impressionable spiritually > inclined people. My experience in life has taught me that until make > efforts towards your sadhana..or as Patanjali and all the masters > suggest: adopting the "niyamas" or habits of disciplne: non- stealing, > honesty, cheerfulness etc. and become oriented towards a satvic > lifestyle...you will not experience spiritual progress or begin to > feel the grace that a master like Amma can bestow. > > I consider myself to be a non-dualist, but a non-dualist with just a > bit of discrimination. When I even watch any of the beautiful videos > of Ramana Maharshi...I begin to feel like I swimming in his > enlightened state..I just notice that I personally do not maintain > that state 24 -7.!! > > Anyway ...LOVE AND ENLIGHTENMENT TO ALL... > > Chris Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.