Guest guest Posted December 28, 2005 Report Share Posted December 28, 2005 F Grade Nepal Political Report- "OP-ED" Wednesday December 28 2005 15:47:53 PM BDT By Bhola B. Rana, Nepal A recent F grade political report on Nepal by Senator Patrick Leahy is full of contradictions and personal biases against the King, the monarchy and the Royal Nepal Army. The analysis does not present an accurate picture of the country. Leahy in one breath says the Royal Nepal Army has won praise for its role in international peacekeeping and immediately goes on to claim that the army is undisciplined. How then can an undisciplined army receive accolades for its peacekeeping role? The Democrat senator rightly says Chief of the Army Staff Gen. Pyar Jung Thapa has received training at the Army War College and has participated in other US military training programmes. Gen. Thapa and other officers have been trained not only in the USA but other countries as well after their basic officer cadet course inside the country. The Royal Nepal Army is an organized and professional force. Gen. Thapa has regularly been instructing his boys to be disciplined while conducting operations against the Maoists to protect the people. He certainly has not ordered them to commit widespread, degrading abuses like the US Army has committed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The Royal Nepal Army is a disciplined force, although Leahy would want his 99 colleagues in the US senate to believe him when he says the army is undisciplined. The army has been deployed to restore peace and defend and protect democracy. The army is there to defend the nation and national institutions which it has done with determination and courage against difficult and challenging odds. The senator says the September 3 Maoist cease-fire is " flawed" but goes on to ask the United States to encourage the army to reciprocate the cessation of hostilities. He says this even while admitting that the Maoist cease-fire was a tactical move to lure the political parties into an alliance and further isolate the King. The senator then asks his government to press the Royal Nepal Army to reciprocate a flawed cease-fire. He then goes on to say there is no way to predict with confidence if the Maoists will participate in a political process in good faith or simply use it as a ruse to gain new recruits and weapons. Even as Leahy said, a Maoist resumption of attacks against civilians would be condemned and resisted by, what he calls, the international community. The extreme communists have said they will violently oppose the February 8 municipal polls by killing the candidates.The United Nations has warned this would be a serious violation of human rights.He calls for free, fair, impartial and transparent elections while calling the municipal polls undemocratic even as the United States pushed and completed parliamentary elections in war-ravaged Iraq. He goes on to say the 12-point understanding between the Maoists and the seven opposition parties is "vague", but it could still be a basis national dialogue to restore democracy and end the conflict. As events have folded, it is clear the purpose of the 12-point agreement is not to restore democracy. The aim of the 12-point agreement is to prolong the political crisis and prevent the immediate restoration of parliamentary democracy. The learned senator says he speaks because he fears Nepal may plunge into chaos. Mr senator, if you aren't aware, the kingdom is already facing a chaotic situation.The senator, by his own admission, says he has thrice in six months spoken in the chamber about Nepal. Had he visited Nepal even once, he would have felt and seen the chaotic situation in the kingdom which he says is a land of mostly impoverished tea and rice farmers. To draw the attention of his colleagues, he could have better described Nepal as the home of Mount Everest. He is inciting a generally apolitical army when he asks it to demonstrate leadership and convince the King "to abandon his imperial ambitions." Asking an "undisciplined" army to show leadership qualities?What imperial ambitions, senator? Leahy, in his own words, says Nepal's political parties do not have a record of putting the interests of the nation above their own self-interest. He does not ask them to reform but instead says, for all their flaws, there is no substitute for them.The administration of George W Bush should think twice before acting on the basis of the report. http://www.bangladesh-web.com/news/view.php?hidDate=2005-12- 29&hidType=EDT&hidRecord=0000000000000000080335 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.