LIQUIDATE TERRORISM FROM Bharatiya (INDIAN) SOIL

[Guest guest]

Bharatiya people condemn, in the harshest possible terms, the lethal and

well-planned series of terrorist attacks on Saturday, October 29, 2005 in New

Delhi in which more than 70 innocent men, women and children were killed and

more than 150 people injured. These bomb blasts should not be treated in

isolation. They are part of the murderous ideology which motivates young

religious bigots and uncivilized brutes to kill anyone who does not

to their fanatic religious beliefs. The long-term aim of this jihad is to

terrorize Hindus, destabilize Bharatiya polity and ultimately establish

Nizam-e-Mustafa

(Rule of Allah) in Bharat. The weak and vacillating policies of the

Government of Bharat (India) coupled with vote bank politics have emboldened

Islamic militants to carry out their heinous attacks with impunity. In the

present parlance, there seems to be no difference between the terrorism and

jihad. It is, therefore, incumbent upon the Government of Bharat to move

fast, arrest the perpetrators of this horrendous crime, and their local

sympathizers, and put them behind bars to languish there for their life or give

them death sentences. We should remember that this is not the first time that

these ghoulish killers have struck in this diabolic and ghastly manner. The

December 13, 2001 attack on the Indian Parliament, the brutal killing of Hindus

at Akshardham Temple in Gujarat on December 24, 2000, attack on the Red Fort in

Delhi, slitting the throat of 12 Hindus in Kashmir October 2005 just after

earth quake in Kashmir and Pakistan, the burning of Hindu colonies in Mau

(U.P.), roasting alive of 58 innocent Hindu women and children on Godhra

railway station in Gujarat, vicious serial bomb blasts in Mumbai in which more

than 350 Hindus were blown to bits, etc. are all part of the dangerous

pan-Islamic movement.

It is a continuation of the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center in New York.

So far as India is concerned, it is actually a part of the undeclared war

calculated to bleed Bharat to death. India Government, leftists and

pro-Congress Party intellectuals and the secularist media can ignore this

danger only at their own peril.

black;">India government should, at least, learn a lesson or two from President

George W. Bush and declare an open war designed to eliminate terrorism from the

Bharatiya soil, instead of indulging in futile rhetoric and intellectual

acrobatic. French problem affects rest of Europe as well

"Multiculturalism has failed, big time," said Angela Merkel, on her way to

becoming chancellor. But Germany never had a policy of recognizing all

cultures. What it has is an immigrant population that long ago ceased to be

only white and Christian. That's what she was complaining about. So was former

chancellor Helmut Schmidt, 85, saying of the 2.6 million Turkish Muslim

Germans, that it had been a big mistake to have let them in. A second theme

coursing through public debate concerns the adaptability or otherwise of

immigrants / Muslims: "They do not integrate.They do not fit in; they

cannot fit in.They live in France

but are not of France" (or Germany, Holland, Belgium, etc.). "They don't

consider themselves French" (or German, Dutch, etc.) or for that matter even

Bharatiya people except taking the privileges and facilities and various

benefits of Hindus.

Arial;">Followers of Semitic religions cannot live with other communities

It seems that clash of civilization is going on all around and it is

increasing. From the Euro-jihad in Paris, to the anti American violence in

Iraq, to the intifada in the Palestinian territories, to the recent threat of

the President of Iran to ‘wipe Israel from the map.” To the string of terror

bombings in Bharat and Indonesia, the common thread is a basic hostility

between the Judeo Christian West, the Islamic East and for Hindus by the

Islamic terrorists and fundamentalists groups and non Islamic groups. That was

the argument made by Samuel Huntington, a Harvard professor, in his 1966 book

The Clash of civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order, in which he

argued that different civilizations naturally find themselves in conflict. When

the book appeared, many critics lambasted the author’s cultural – historical

pessimism. Indeed, this particular clash of civilization has been going on for

14 centuries since Islamic armies first swept over Bharat which was mostly

Hindu country, over the middle east which was at the time was mostly Christian.

Other civilizations clashes go back to the beginning of recorded time.

Herodotus, the ancient Greek chronicler known as “the father of history” wrote

that Xerxes, king of the Persians, convened a war council in which he told his

nobles and generals about his plans to invade in 480 BC. By this course, then

we shall bring all mankind under our yoke, alike those who are guilty and those

who are innocent of doing us wrong. In other words, the Greek historian painted

an unflattering portrait of the Persian King. Different cultures fight about

everything, including their separate versions of historical truth. Many

countries are having a tough time with their Muslim populations, like France,

Spain, and Britain who brought home many Muslim people from their former

colonies.

0in 0pt;"> So how do cultures ever stop clashing? It seems the best

way of avoiding conflict is to avoid contact. The Israelis have learnt this

lesson well. The Israelis after decades of trying to subdue the Palestinian

Muslims have moved to a far wiser strategy - - total disengagement from Gaza

and a big wall across the West Bank. At the time of partition of

Bharat, many people wanted to exchange population of Muslims and

Hindus in Pakistan and Bharat, but it was Gandhi who opposed the exchange of the

population. In fact all decisions of Gandhi and Nehru have always gone against

Bharat and Hindus. In spite of anti Hindu policies of Gandhi’s, secular and

anti-Hindu people have given the status to anti-Hindu Gandhi as Father of

Nation. My foot. What must be done in order to save Hinduism from the

followers of Semitic religions Former President Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan said

“religion is behaviour and not mere belief.” By this yardstick, those

committing violence in the name of Islam are not “misguided” believers.

Terrorists planning and committing atrocities in the name of Islam,

particularly when backed by another country, are using violence for

politico-religious ends. They are true jihadis and it would be irresponsible to

pretend they are romantic misguided youth who can be brought into the national

mainstream by redressing imaginary grievances. Islam is bent upon destroying

Hinduism. What must be done in order to save Hinduism and stop the Islamic

flood? The Russian writer and a sociologist who works in Russian Academy of

Sciences and has interest in

Indian culture has suggested the way of saving Hinduism in his one article

written exclusively for Organiser. He can be contacted at

(zinoviev555 ) There is only one way and it is called mass conversion

of Muslims into Hinduism. If Hindus want to survive, they must convert. They

must adopt the strategy of Catholic missionaries and Muslim mullahs. I don’t

mean only conversion of one-time Hindus that only recently adopted other

religions. Hinduism must convert also people of non-Hindu origin. The fact that

they live in India is enough because all Indians, notwithstanding their

religious affiliation, had once had Hindu ancestors. If a problem arises, in

which caste to enlist

the newly converted Hindus, that can be determined by lots. This kind of

assignment is by no means accidental; it can be regarded as the will of

providence, the voice of fate, and it is not surprising that this method was so

widely used in antiquity—in Greece and Rome. There is another question: is it

possible to convert Muslims into Hinduism? Because, as it is well known, the

followers of this religion hold firmly to their principles, and it is very

difficult to change their views. There is a theory that Muslims would never

desert their religion, this is absolutely impossible. But this is just a myth.

There is a

good example from our recent past. In one neighbouring country to

Russia—Bulgaria—there is area called Rhodopa mountain, populated with

Bulgarian-speaking Muslims. Bulgarians, in principle, are Christians,

pertaining to the Greek-Orthodox Church. But this very area is populated with

Muslims due to the strong Turk influence in the past. In the 15th century Turks

forced the local population to renounce Christianity and to adopt Islam as their

religion, and defiance was brutally punished. When, in 1526, Sultan Suleyman the

Magnificent began his campaign against Western Europe, he said: “I want my

soldiers, in their way to Vienna, to pass through Muslim lands only, and this

corridor to go up to the very Austrian border.” And his desire almost came

true. But what happened some ten years ago—in the mid-1990s? The local

population in the Rhodope Mountains with Bulgarian ethnic consciousness, being

well educated and well aware of their history, suddenly decided to re-embrace

Christianity. A remarkable man came forward on the religious scene—Father Boyan

Saruev. With his charisma and his unique gift to persuade people, this man of

great spiritual power succeeded in converting several hundred Muslims. For a

period

of seven or eight years between two and three thousand people—mainly from the

young, educated generation—adopted the Greek-Orthodox creed. This event was so

astonishing precedent that it stunned European public and journalists from many

countries came in person to see with their own eyes that it was true.

Obviously, the claim that Muslims can never be persuaded to adopt another

religion is nothing but a myth. Under certain conditions, this is quite

possible. Very soon such conditions will be present in India, too, because with

higher education Muslims will realise that Hinduism is the innate religion of

their native country, and Islam is an alien creed forcefully imported from

outside. Similarly with the situation when, 600 years ago, during

the Renaissance, Western Europeans realised that they were successors of ancient

Rome and Greece, and embraced their culture, which for long centuries was being

condemned by the Roman Catholic Church as “pagan” and “non-Christian”, one day

the Muslims on the Indian subcontinent will understand that they are inheritors

of a great civilisation completely different from that of Arabs and the Middle

East. This is a problem of education and knowledge. ===============

FareChase - Search multiple travel sites in one click.