Guest guest Posted September 9, 2005 Report Share Posted September 9, 2005 Namaskar Mitra, No Reservations in Private Unaided Colleges ‘No state quotas, reservations in pvt insitutions’ read the Hindustan Times headlines of August 13. It did not matter whether the private institution was run by the majority of minority community. The Apex court also directed that taking capitation fees would no longer be permitted, gave unaided institutions the unfettered right to choose students and lay down the procedure for this provided the exercise was fair, transparent and on-exploitative. It recommended that admissions be regulated by a single window procedure having regard to the larger interest and welfare of the student community. To read judgment - http://esamskriti.com/html/inside.asp?cat=744&subcat=743&cname=intro%5Fpg1%5F3 Key Decisions: · Neither the policy of reservation nor the quota or % of admissions can be decided by the State, in both a minority and non-minority provided these institutions are not aided by the State meaning they receive no government grants. · The admission procedure adopted by private institution or group of institutions, if it failed to satisfy all or any of the triple tests can be taken over by the State substituting its own procedure. Till regulations are framed, the admission committees can oversee admissions so as to ensure that merit is the only basis for admission. · Every institution is free to devise its own fee structure but the same can be regulated to prevent profiteering. No capitation fee can be charged. · The Court allows the constitution of a Committees as a stopgap or adhoc arrangement until a suitable legislation or regulation framed by the State steps in. I believe that this minority thing, linguistic or religious has divided the country, made people more aware of the differences amongst them. Can we not have a policy that looks at people as human beings first, next how rich or poor they are and lastly their religion. Due to our socialist beliefs private institutions are discouraged from making profits meaning there are not enough quality institutions to take care of India’s burgeoning education needs. No wonder schools from U.S.A, U.K., Australia and New Zealand are wooing Indian students. So mired are we in old mindsets that we cease to realize the loss caused by Indian students going abroad. According to www.educationobserver.com, “India sent more students to study in the U.S.A. than any other country in the 2001-02 academic year, according to a study released by Institute of International Education in Washington. The total number of Indian students is 66,836”. If each parent remitted an average of Rs 12 lakhs p.a. roughly Rs 8,000 crs was remitted to every year. If only we allow private institutions to run independently it would attract investment and prevent atleast 50% of the students to study in India as well as get foreign students to study here. Look at the multiplier effect of Indian remittances on the U.S. economy! But non-resident Indians have excelled! Says Subhash Kak, Professor in the Asian Studies and Cognitive Science Programs, Louisiana State University, “NRIs have done well in the West because the West has institutions that reward excellence, whereas India is mired in sloppy socialist notions”. We need a transparent regulatory framework for the education sector managed by an All India Regulator. Related articles - Why did the Ramakrishna Mission say they are not Hindus? http://www.esamskriti.com/html/new_inside.asp?cat_name=why&cid=670&sid=129 Share the Wealth, With Prem, Cheers sanjeev Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.