Guest guest Posted September 3, 2005 Report Share Posted September 3, 2005 CHINA WARNS UNITED STATES ON EVE OF PRESIDENTIAL VISIT: An Analysis "If the Americans are determined to interfere…. we will be determined to respond, and we Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all cities east of Xian" (a major city in Central China)"Of course, the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds of, or two hundreds of (or) even more cities will be destroyed by the Chinese". by Dr Subhash Kapila Introductory Observations: http://saag.org/papers16/paper1527.html China continues to add to the contentiousness of United States – China relations, with hardly a week to go for the Chinese President's visit to the United States. A perspective analysis of President Bush- President Hu Jintao meeting stands published in this authors paper "United States: Visit of China's President (September 7,2005): An Analysis" (SAAG Paper No 1525 dated 30th August,2005). The major conclusion was that with the mutually suspicious perceptions of United States and China, no dramatic breakthrough seems feasible in the presidential meeting on September7, 2005. China's latest warning to the United States in relation to Taiwan emanated on September 1, 2005. The issue of a 17,000 word broad policy document – A white paper on China's policies on arms control, disarmament and proliferation was used as a guise to issue implicit warnings to United States over Taiwan. For purposes of analysis, this paper will only address three related aspects, namely (1) United States commitments and weapons sales to Taiwan (2) China's reiteration of its nuclear policies, and (3) China's current implicit warning to the United States. The overall atmospherics in United States – China relations in terms of suspicious intentions and perceptions stand analyzed in the paper, referred above. United States Commitment on Taiwan's Security and Weapons Sales: Taiwan's security against any attack by China enjoys a very broad- band support in the United States. It is also a very emotive issue for the United States Congress enjoying bi-partisan support. The United States stands officially pledged to assist Taiwan in its efforts to defend itself against any invasion by China The United States even in its latest paper on" China's Military Modernization" has focused on China's invasion plans for Taiwan. In particular, a recurring theme has been the building of China's ballistic missiles across Taiwan. The US report states that China has now massed 600-700 ballistic missiles aimed at Taiwan. China is also honing its amphibious warfare and airborne invasion capabilities. In the above context, the United States has on offer the following weapons sales package to Taiwan PATRIOT anti missile systems US offer is on the latest PAC3 Version which only USA and Japan have. 3 batteries Anti submarine warfare aircraft 12 Diesel electric submarines 8 The United States is also considering additionally ballistic missile defense shield systems for Japan and Taiwan. China's Reiteration of its Nuclear Policies China has been defining its nuclear policies every year either through its Annual Defense White Papers or special white papers on disarmament, arms control and proliferation. On being questioned on the document released on September, 01, 2005, China's Foreign Ministry head of the relevant disarmament division reiterated: "We have solemnly promised that we will not use nuclear weapons first, or threaten non-nuclear countries and regions with nuclear weapons at any time and under any circumstances." Further, he said "This promise has never changed and will not change in the future" The Chinese official gave the above replies as a response to even the specific question whether the above Chinese policies applied to Taiwan also. Analytically, the response in relation to Taiwan was evasive; China does not consider Taiwan as any other "country". China claims Taiwan as a "part of China". If China reserves the right to use nuclear weapons against Taiwan it will be the first instance in world affairs where a country would use nuclear weapons against a "region" of its territory. It is inconceivable for China to do, but then why the ambiguity is being so evasively maintained. China's Current Warnings to United States over Taiwan The first Chinese warning to the United States over Taiwan was issued in July 2005 by General Zhu Chenghu who stated that Beijing might respond with nuclear weapons if United States interfered in a China- Taiwan conflict. His statements merit consideration for analysis; · "If the Americans draw their missiles and position-guided ammunition into the target zone in Chinas territory (read Taiwan), I think we will have to respond with nuclear weapons". · "If the Americans are determined to interfere…. we will be determined to respond, and we Chinese will prepare ourselves for the destruction of all cities east of Xian" (a major city in Central China) · "Of course, the Americans will have to be prepared that hundreds of, or two hundreds of (or) even more cities will be destroyed by the Chinese". The second Chinese warning to USA emanated in implicit terms on September 1, 2005 when releasing the Chinese document on the subject. The Chinese Foreign Ministry official spokesperson made these pointed statements: · "As the Taiwan question involves its core interests, China opposes the attempt by any country (read USA) to provide help or protection to the Taiwan region of China in the field of missile defense by any means". (Reflected in the document) · "On relevant countries (read USA) deployment of missile defense system, China stance is: We think it will affect global stability, international strategic stability, relations between nations and regional security". · "It will trigger the proliferation of missile technologies. So we hope relevant countries (read USA) could take a prudent attitude in the regard" In simple words China is warning USA to "lay-off" on Taiwan Chinese Warnings to USA: An Analysis China's warnings to USA over Taiwan are intriguing for the following reasons: · Does China seriously expect that the United Stated would be cowed down by such Chinese warnings? · Does China think, that it can militarily "teach a lesson" (China's favourite strategy) to USA, if USA does not heed China's warnings? · Is it part of China's domestic posturing for its party hardliners, that President Hu Jintao would talk tough in his discussions with President Bush in September 7, 2005? · Is it an implied warning to Japan also (currently election campaign inode) not to participate in US Japan theatre missile defense systems? On all the counts above, China is being unrealistic in expecting that its end-objectives will be met. Taiwan is the United States and Japan's floating aircraft carrier astride vital sea lanes of communication, whose falling into Chinese hands would jeoparadise US and Japanese national security. China is being unrealistic to expect that USA would abandon Taiwan, just because China desires so. In its own calculations, China having given these warnings would now feel free to embark on its additional process of missile proliferation. One can expect the following from China. · Increase in China's missile supplies to Pakistan. The current Pakistan cruise missile test was a Chinese missile (older version). It was a response to the perceived US tilt towards India. It was not a Pakistan creation. · China missile proliferation to Iran, Syria and possible up- gradation of the 15 year old CSS-2 missiles of Saudi Arabia, supplied by China It needs to be remembered, that in terms of demonstrated patterns, China has always reacted to American military support - related developments in Taiwan, by creating Chinese counter-pressure points for USA in the Middle East The United States has to be therefore more prepared to deal with China's counter-pressure points in the Middle East, than in East Asia Concluding Observations China does not seem to be serious in investing credibly in the improvement of China - United States relations. If it was so, then the direct and implied warnings by China as elucidated above would not have emanated on the very eve of the Chinese President's visit to USA China's core problem, like that of its protégé in South Asia, namely Pakistan, is that, both do not seem to recognize their strategic asymmetries with whom they contend. (The author is an International Relations and Strategic Affairs analyst. He is the Consultant, Strategic Affairs with South Asia Analysis Group. Email drsubhashkapila) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.