Giant Bead (To Jim)

[Guest guest]

Namaste Jim,

 

Hey brother, no worries about "butting in" ) Butt in whenever you

want. Thanks and bless you for sharing your story! Its very kind of

you to make the "spiritual connection" with your Indian patient.

 

Yes I understand its protocol around the world's hospitals to remove

all articles of jewelry whenever someone is gonna have an x-ray or

CAT-scan, etc.

 

Your story moved me deeply. Hope the Hindu patient is fine and

hasn't got any severe health complications, by the Grace of Lord

Shiva and "Aum".

 

Btw, the essence of "Aum" itself is "God-head", such as in the case

of the patient who is obviously Shaivite by the looks and sounds of

things. "Aum" also eptiomizes the Essence of Lord Ganesha (Son of

Lord Shiva) as "God-head" [hard to explain in a few sentences this

now].

 

Yes, rudraksha is more powerful than most people realize. The beads

of high quality contain natural electromagnetic properties that can

be scientifically measured. They also contain biochemical and

paramagnetic properties. The last time a scientific team in India

performed studies was some 25 years ago I think.. Apparently they

measured the frequencies with hertz, etc.

 

Om Namah Shivaya

Ganesha Sharanam

Simone

 

 

 

, james richard <nhraddude71>

wrote:

>

> Sorry to but in Simone but I have a real cute Rudruksha story for

you. I was working my night shift at the hospital and went to go

portably xray a man who happened to be Hindi.

 

As protocal for a chest xray you always want to get any neclaces out

of the eway of the throught so you can see the airway.

 

i went to move the mans necklace and there was like a 1 inch

rudruksha sead on it and i complimented him on it.

 

He didnt speak much english but he told me" Is Shiva, Is Aum, God,

It bring peace to you" I just nodded smiled and said "I understand"

 

> I dought anyone else that night in the E.R. made that connection

with him. I guess the Rudruksha is more powerful than i thought.

>

>

Jim

>

> Simone <syzenith> wrote:

> Around 3 and a quarter inches. Some are slightly more, a tiny tad

less.

>

> Approximate equivalent = roughly 8.3cm to 8.5cm

>

>

> , Len Rosenberg <kalipadma108>

> wrote:

 

> > Can you give the size of these beads in millimeters?

>