Guest guest Posted May 19, 2005 Report Share Posted May 19, 2005 Namaste Tang, You got a good point there too, thank you! Bright blessings, Om Shree Ganeshaya Namah Om Simone , "tangchikhay" <tangchikhay> wrote: > i think u guys got Jimmy wrong in the sense that this group should > be dedicated to the study and apprecition of a complex, beguilling > and the same time, friendly and benevolent form of paratmman, Lord > Ganesha.. Jim was not negatting the sakti, but just putting the > spotlight back to our beloved and adorable, Pillaiyar... > > every single active form of deity has to be come in the the nirguna > and saguna form --- usually the male deity (for example, Lord > Krishna) represents the resevoir of energy, the potential energy, > the fire.. whereelse the female deity (for example, Goddess radha) > represents the ,manifestation of energy, the kinetic energy , the > heat and light from the fire.. and that is also one of the reason > why Goddess Saraswati never amounted greatly to have temples built > in her honor simply because she and Lord Brahma are deemed > incomplete.. > > Actually the "female" form of Lord ganapati is called Vigneswari and > he/she is mostly worshipped in the southern states.. > > ciao > tang Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.