Guest guest Posted August 29, 2005 Report Share Posted August 29, 2005 JK <tiptronicus@g...> wrote: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/1210703.cms In this article, the mummy is 3000 years old, which makes it around 1000 B.C and that is quoted by an archaeologist. http://www.ddinews.com/Homepage/Homepage+-+Headlines/Mummy.htm Now in this news, it has reached the minister and the date is now 3500 B.C. Note that no carbon dating has been done on this sample. People are throwing dates with a difference of 2500 years as if it is a matter of few days. More at http://www.varnam.org/blog/archives/2005/08/an_indus_valley.html --- End forwarded message --- Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.