Direction of Managemant

[Guest guest]

http://community.webtv.net/lakshmi/TheLakshmiSampradaya

color>fontfamily>Pratyatosa Dasa <pratyatosa >color>April 14,

2005 6:24:15 PM PDTcolor>aditidesign , angel108b ,

atr (AT) uneedspeed (DOT) net, bhagwatam (AT) hotmail (DOT) com, blair (AT) iwvisp (DOT) com, dasdasdas (AT) aol (DOT) com,

deshpande108 , fmorales (AT) dharmacentral (DOT) com, gauridas (AT) aol (DOT) com,

govinda (AT) coconut-wireless (DOT) net, gsibbald (AT) webtv (DOT) net, harekrishna (AT) krishna (DOT) org,

irm (AT) iskconirm (DOT) com, janardanadasa , japa-mala (AT) msn (DOT) com,

jfedorowsky (AT) oxfordlaw (DOT) com, lakshmi (AT) webtv (DOT) net, madhava58 ,

mahesh (AT) agtsp (DOT) freeserve.co.uk, messenger_only2002 ,

mitchelangelo (AT) netzero (DOT) net, mpandit (AT) giasbg01 (DOT) vsnl.net.in, muk_39 (AT) hotmail (DOT) com,

mvvd2 , naveen.khurana (AT) att (DOT) net, nevans (AT) hawaii (DOT) edu,

nihar_singh76 , pg1944 (AT) netzero (DOT) com, pragosh (AT) videotron (DOT) ca,

pratyatosa (AT) hotmail (DOT) com, prtha_devi_dasi (AT) hotmail (DOT) com, pss108 (AT) juno (DOT) com,

radhapran (AT) hotmail (DOT) com, raghu (AT) roopa (DOT) org, ramrajya (AT) aol (DOT) com,

ritamehndigoddess , rocana (AT) harekrsna (DOT) com, royrichard49 ,

srvnt108 (AT) juno (DOT) com, swayamrupa (AT) hotmail (DOT) com, terrys108 (AT) msn (DOT) com,

vibhuvyas , vishoka_108 , visvadas (AT) hotmail (DOT) com,

vmoreland108 , whollycow (AT) snappynet (DOT) net, williamr (AT) hawaii (DOT) edu,

wlg (AT) aol (DOT) com, woorocks108 (AT) aol (DOT) com, wzodda ,

zakheim (AT) earthlink (DOT) netSubject: color>Reply from Hridayananda Swami

color>Pratyatosa Dasa <pratyatosa >fontfamily>

Hridayananda das Goswami <Hrid (AT) cox (DOT) net>Pratyatosa Dasa

<pratyatosa (AT) hotmail (DOT) com>Re: (no subject)Thu, 14 Apr 2005

06:11:01 -0700

I was informed that Hridayananda Swami (?) told Hari Villas, GBCSeattle that

Prithu prabhu should not have stepped down from therole of guru due to

masturbation, as masturbation does not breakregulative principles due to the

fact that no woman is involved.Is this true? I hope not, because if it is, it

is an extremely contaminatingand disturbing statement. If a sannyasi or guru

masturbates even once, thenhow can he consider himself a sannyasi or a guru

from that point onwards?I was misquoted.Hoping you are well.With best

wishes,Hridayananda das Goswami

Attachment: (application/msword) DOMCOVER.doc [not stored]

Attachment: (application/msword) DOMCOVER.doc [not stored]

Attachment: (image/jpeg) page1.jpg [not stored]

Attachment: (image/jpeg) page2.jpg [not stored]

Attachment: (image/jpeg) page3.jpg [not stored]

Attachment: (image/jpeg) page4.jpg [not stored]

Attachment: (image/jpeg) page5.jpg [not stored]