Guest guest Posted March 4, 2005 Report Share Posted March 4, 2005 Hare Krsna! All Glories to Srila Prabhupada! Pamho Dharmapad Prabhu wrote: "Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation?"================================ If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. Read the following: Jesus was walking with his disciples. In John 9:1-2 As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" Note: the disciples are VERY specific as to the sin indicating committed in PREVIOUS life): 1) this man OR 2) his parents which RESULTED of him being BORN blind. It appears at that time they UNDERSTOOD that Karma (sinful acts performed in PREVIOUS life) which RESULTED they put down to TWO SPECIFIC causes 1) this man OR 2) his parents So, although in THIS PARTICULAR case Jesus replies,"neither this man or his parents but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life" BUT----- nevertheless no one can rule out the GENERAL ACCEPTED UNDERSTANDING among the disciples that it WAS 1) this man OR 2) his parents OTHERWISE, --***WHY?***---- did they bother to ask SO SPECIFICALLY 1) this man OR 2) his parents Unless, THEY ALSO understood it MUST be-- ONE or the OTHER to have been the CAUSE of sinning(reaction of Karma) PRIOR to his being--- blind from birth. Hare Krishna! ys mahesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 HARE KRISHNA ! SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! DEAR VAISHNAVAS, PAMHO. HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. HOWEVER, THE CALVINIST AND RELATED PROTESTANT MISREADINGS OF THE NEUTRAL JUDGMENT WORD "KRIMA", ALWAYS IN THE EXTREME NEGATIVE AS "DAMNATION", IS WHY THE PROTESTANT BIBLES ARE SO HEAVY ON "DAMNATION" AND 'HELLFIRE'. KRIMA [KARMA] AS GOD'S PERFECT "JUDGMENT" IS SUBJECTIVELY EXPERIENCED AS EITHER 'GOOD' OR 'BAD'. A 'CRIMINAL' IS ONE UPON WHOM A 'NEGATIVE' JUDGMENT HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED. HOWEVER, THE JEWISH AND CATHOLIC TRADITIONS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT GOD'S JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS BOTH JUST AND MERCIFUL. FURTHERMORE, THE UNIVERSAL MESSIAH JESUS CHRIST DECLARES THAT "FOR JUDGMENT I AM COME INTO THIS WORLD" JOHN 9.39. SEE ALSO MATTHEW 7.2 "FOR WHAT JUDGMENT YOU JUDGE, YOU SHALL BE JUDGED". (THERE ARE OVER 200 VERSES IN THE THREE JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS TO STUDY IN THIS REGARD.) "CRITICCRISIS", "CRITERIACRITERION" ETC. ARE ALL "KRIMA" RELATED WORDS IN THE ENGLISH. PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA-KRISHNA) CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI vediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote: > Hare Krsna! > All Glories to Srila Prabhupada! > Pamho > > > Dharmapad Prabhu wrote: > "Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation?" > > ================================ > > If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. Read the following: > > Jesus was walking with his disciples. > > In John 9:1-2 > > As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" > > Note: the disciples are VERY specific as to the sin indicating committed in PREVIOUS life): > 1) this man OR > 2) his parents > > which RESULTED of him being BORN blind. > > It appears at that time they UNDERSTOOD that Karma (sinful acts performed in PREVIOUS life) which RESULTED they put down to TWO SPECIFIC causes > 1) this man OR > 2) his parents > > So, although in THIS PARTICULAR case Jesus replies,"neither this man or his parents but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life" > > BUT----- nevertheless no one can rule out the GENERAL ACCEPTED UNDERSTANDING among the disciples that it WAS > 1) this man OR > 2) his parents > > OTHERWISE, --***WHY?***---- did they bother to ask SO SPECIFICALLY > 1) this man OR > 2) his parents > > Unless, THEY ALSO understood it MUST be-- ONE or the OTHER to have been the CAUSE of sinning(reaction of Karma) PRIOR to his being--- blind from birth. > > Hare Krishna! > ys mahesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Bhakti Ananda proclaimed : > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > PAMHO. > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. Vedic teachings are very clear about reincarnation . They're is no need to follow your advice to understand this topic particularly when a specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by centuries of Council. This judeo-centric conception of absolute truth is not exactly what Srila Prabhupada or other great sages use to evoke for displaying different features of karma , as birth and death. > > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] There is no doubt of existing few similarities between Vedas and jewish historiography but mainly vaisnavas give not great credit to the last. > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. Correct, all languages derive from prakrti, included hebrew , greek and many different mlecchas languages. This caractere is to transform words and meanings for misappropriation . Similarly Srila Prabhupada' book are regularly revisited and "enlarged" but " fortunately" much less distributed than original copies. > > > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA-KRISHNA) > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. What a strange call for an Iskcon leader! Why don't you implore to read Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam and book distribution?. > IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) was certainly involved with subterranean Nagas but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. He was kicked out from the celestial abode and falling to the earth, he has been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, his master, with bear marrow in a submarine cave and taught him a kind of asuric medicine, using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine.( I better personally take shelter in Ayurveda). Later, Chiron as been killed by Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. Sandipani Muni is the spiritual master of Balaram and Krsna. Do you still feel part of Chiron sampradaya? The snake of the caduceus, emblem of western medicine, refer to the Nagaasuras,the use of venom for healing and not to Ananta Sesa. Remember, brahmanical culture had big problem with the snakes, 3000 years BC and probably still has. So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted esoterism rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . > > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI Next time, will you teach us how vedas are deriving from Torah or K'baal? You cannot be a representant of vedic culture with such statements, Maharajah and your incomplete understanding of vedas as for judeo-greek mythology you purposely mix with is not sufficient to exhort people to follow your tri-decennial advice. All your post is full of falsification. This is a sign of a confused mind and I humbly urge you to rectify the situation before receiving the unwanted reward in due course of time for polluting Iskcon and vedic culture as many other bogus "gurus" got. Your servant Vrajananda das , Iskcon Revival Movement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 Bhakti Ananda Prabhu Hare Krsna! All Glories to Srila Prabhupada Pamho Just a few instructions from OUR GLORIOUS spiritual master His Divine Grace A C Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada will be enough to answer why many devotees do not wish take part in what you have suggested.----- No offense intended. Please read. Thank-you very much. 74-01-02. Letter: Bhumata There is no other scripture which can compare to the Vedic scriptures so we should study these scriptures** exclusively**. When one becomes an initiated disciple although he has respect for the Christian Bible, nevertheless he must understand the Bhagavad-gita and must apply all study there and not spend time unnecessarily with other literatures. 69-11-02. Letter: Hamsaduta Regarding your question about Lord Jesus Christ, we accept him as saktyavesa avatara. Lord Buddha is in the same category also. Lord Buddha is mentioned specifically in Srimad-Bhagavatam as incarnation of Godhead, and yet Vaisnavas do not accept his philosophy, which is classified as atheism. Similarly, even if we accept Lord Jesus Christ as saktyavesa avatara., it doesn't mean that we have to accept his philosophy. But we have all respects for him without fail. Regarding books like Aquarian Gospel or even the Testiments, we cannot accept them as authorities because sometimes it is learnt that the words are not actually spoken by Christ, but they are so set up by the devotees. For example, in the Ten Commandments it is clearly stated "Thou shalt not kill", but some Bishop in Boston has changed it to "Thou shalt do no murder". This means the Bishop wants to keep hold for animal slaughter. So don't bother about all these literatures. We have all respect for these great preachers, but we do not require to study books save and accept for some reference. We must push on our philosophy how to love God. **Our process is simple. We have got volumes of books also, so it is better for us to mind our own business than to divert our attention in the studies of other books. This was definitely forbidden by Lord Caitanya.** NBS 12 P Narada-bhakti-sutra These ten principles of devotional service are the beginning. Additional principles are as follows: (11) One should avoid committing offenses against the holy name, the Deity, etc. (12) One should avoid associating with nondevotees. (13) One should not aspire to have many disciples. (14) One should not unnecessarily divert his attention by partially studying many books so as to appear very learned. For devotional service, it is sufficient to scrutinizingly study books like the Bhagavad-gita, the Srimad-Bhagavatam, and the Caitanya-caritamrta. (15) One should not be disturbed in either loss or gain. (16) One should not allow oneself to be overwhelmed by lamentation for any reason. (17) One should not blaspheme the demigods, although one should not worship them. Similarly, one should not criticize other scriptures, although one should not follow the principles therein. 690915LE.LON Lectures You haven't got to study many books. You just simply study Bhagavad-gita As It Is. ys mahesh - Bhakti Ananda Goswami vediculture Monday, March 07, 2005 9:38 AM Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible HARE KRISHNA !SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA !DEAR VAISHNAVAS, PAMHO.HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL]IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. HOWEVER, THE CALVINIST AND RELATED PROTESTANT MISREADINGS OF THE NEUTRAL JUDGMENT WORD "KRIMA", ALWAYS IN THE EXTREME NEGATIVE AS "DAMNATION", IS WHY THE PROTESTANT BIBLES ARE SO HEAVY ON "DAMNATION" AND 'HELLFIRE'. KRIMA [KARMA] AS GOD'S PERFECT "JUDGMENT" IS SUBJECTIVELY EXPERIENCED AS EITHER 'GOOD' OR 'BAD'. A 'CRIMINAL' IS ONE UPON WHOM A 'NEGATIVE' JUDGMENT HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED. HOWEVER, THE JEWISH AND CATHOLIC TRADITIONS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT GOD'S JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS BOTH JUST AND MERCIFUL. FURTHERMORE, THE UNIVERSAL MESSIAH JESUS CHRISTDECLARES THAT "FOR JUDGMENT I AM COME INTO THIS WORLD" JOHN 9.39. SEE ALSO MATTHEW 7.2 "FOR WHAT JUDGMENT YOU JUDGE, YOU SHALL BE JUDGED". (THERE ARE OVER 200 VERSES IN THE THREE JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS TO STUDY IN THIS REGARD.) "CRITIC" "CRISIS", "CRITERIACRITERION" ETC. ARE ALL "KRIMA" RELATED WORDS IN THE ENGLISH. PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA-KRISHNA) CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.)PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI --- In vediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote:> Hare Krsna!> All Glories to Srila Prabhupada!> Pamho> > > Dharmapad Prabhu wrote:> "Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation?"> > ================================> > If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. Read the following:> > Jesus was walking with his disciples.> > In John 9:1-2> > As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"> > Note: the disciples are VERY specific as to the sin indicating committed in PREVIOUS life):> 1) this man OR> 2) his parents> > which RESULTED of him being BORN blind.> > It appears at that time they UNDERSTOOD that Karma (sinful acts performed in PREVIOUS life) which RESULTED they put down to TWO SPECIFIC causes > 1) this man OR> 2) his parents> > So, although in THIS PARTICULAR case Jesus replies,"neither this man or his parents but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life"> > BUT----- nevertheless no one can rule out the GENERAL ACCEPTED UNDERSTANDING among the disciples that it WAS > 1) this man OR> 2) his parents> > OTHERWISE, --***WHY?***---- did they bother to ask SO SPECIFICALLY > 1) this man OR> 2) his parents> > Unless, THEY ALSO understood it MUST be-- ONE or the OTHER to have been the CAUSE of sinning(reaction of Karma) PRIOR to his being--- blind from birth.> > Hare Krishna!> ys maheshThis is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome.Remember, Vedic Culture is not an artificial imposition, but is the natural state of a society that is in harmony with God and the environment.Om Shantih, Harih Om Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: vediculture/<*> To from this group, send an email to: vediculture<*> Your use of is subject to: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 7, 2005 Report Share Posted March 7, 2005 HARE KRISHNA ! SRILA PRABHUPADA KI JAYA! DEAR MAHESH PRABHU, PAMHO. (PLEASE EXCUSE MY WRITING IN ALL UPPER CASE, AS THESE LARGER LETTERS ARE EASIER FOR ME TO SEE.) I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU THAT INITIATED DISCIPLES OF A MASTER SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON THE STUDIES PRESCRIBED FOR THEM BY THEIR MASTER. IN FACT, FOR OVER 30 YEARS I HAVE TOLD MANY DEVOTEES THAT THEY SHOULD OBEY SRILA PRABHUPADA AND READ BHAGAVAD-GITA, THEN SRIMAD- BHAGAVATAM, AND THEN CAITANYA-CARITAMRTA, AND SHOULD STRICTLY AVOID READING ALL OF THE NONSENSE 'NEW AGE' LITERATURES THAT THEY WERE READING. REGARDING MY OWN STUDIES, FROM THE BEGINNING OF MY SERVICE TO SRILA PRABHUPADA, IT WAS IN THE FIELD OF VAISHNAVA-JUDEO-CATHOLIC HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES, AND AFTER OUR BELOVED SRILA PRABHUPADA DISAPPEARED, I WAS ACTUALLY BLESSED AND FORMALLY ANOINTED TO CARRY ON THIS 'INTERFAITH' SERVICE BY ACARYA PRABHAKAR MISHRA, SRILA PRABHUPADA'S FIRST DISCIPLE AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE ORIGINAL LEAGUE OF DEVOTEES. THE POINT OF MY POST WAS THAT RATHER THAN READ SO MANY VERY LATE PROTESTANT CORRUPTIONS OF THE AUTHENTIC JEWISH AND CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC SCRIPTURES, AND NONSENSE NEW AGE BOOKS LIKE THE SO-CALLED 'AQUARIAN GOSPEL' (WHICH IS A MODERN 'CHANNELED' WORK OF FICTION) AND SPECULATE ABOUT SUCH THINGS, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STUDY SUCH SUBJECTS AS "KARMA" IN THE BIBLE, ONE SHOULD GO TO THE ACTUAL AUTHENTICALLY ANCIENT SOURCE MATERIALS. MY COMMENT IS NOT DIRECTED TO THE MANY INITIATED DEVOTEES WHO ARE CHASTELY STUDYING THEIR OWN GAUDIYA VAISHNAVA SCRIPTURES. IT IS DIRECTED TO THE PREACHERS AND SO-CALLED SCHOLARS AND RESEARCHISTS IN THE MOVEMENT, WHO INSIST ON WRITING AND TEACHING ABOUT JUDAISM AND / OR CATHOLICISM OR CHRISTIANITY, WHEN IN FACT THEY KNOW VERY LITTLE OR PRACTICALLY NOTHING ABOUT THESE TRADITIONS FROM ANY AUTHENTIC SOURCES. INSTEAD THESE SO-CALLED SCHOLARS HAVE OFTEN FILLED THEIR HEADS WITH NEO-GNOSTICISM OR WESTERN ESOTERIC TRADITION 'NEW AGE' IDEAS ABOUT JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY. HAVING DONE SO, THEY THEN MAKE COUNTLESS OFFENCES AGAINST GOD AND THE DEVOTEES OF THESE TRADITIONS, AS WELL AS EMBARRASSING THE VAISHNAVA TRADITION WITH THEIR MALEDUCATED AND PREJUDICIAL NONSENSE. WORST OF ALL, THEY HAVE BROUGHT THEIR NEW AGE NONSENSE INTO THE PURE VAISHNAVA TRADITION AND POLLUTED IT WITH ALL OF THEIR 'CHANNELED' PSYCHIC, THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY RELATED 'ASCENDED MASTERS' AND 'ARYAN CHRIST' NEW AGE NONSENSE. SO I WOULD BE MUCH HAPPIER IF ALL THESE RASCALS WOULD JUST MIND THEIR OWN VAISHNAVA STUDIES AND LEAVE DISCUSSION OF THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION UP TO THOSE WHOSE SERVICE IT IS, AND WHO ARE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED FOR IT. SPIRITUAL CHASTITY IN ONE'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. SRILA PRABHUPADA EMPHASIZED THIS PRINCIPLE FOR THE GOOD OF ALL OF HIS DISCIPLES. GURU, SHASTRA AND SADHU GUIDE THE FAITHFUL DISCIPLE IN AN AUTHENTIC 'APOSTOLIC' LINEAGE. TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS IN SUCH A LINEAGE REQUIRES AN UNDIVIDED DEVOTION. HOWEVER, IF THE DISCIPLE IS NOT 'SPIRITUALLY CHASTE', THEY WILL NOT BE SATISFIED WITH THEIR GURU OR SHASTRA OR THE SADHUS / SAINTS OF THEIR OWN TRADITION. THUS THEY WILL WANDER, EITHER IN THEIR THOUGHTS OR ACTUAL DEEDS, FROM THE STRAIGHT-AND-NARROW PATH MARKED OUT FOR THEM BY THEIR MASTER. IN THIS WANDERING MOOD, THEY WILL BECOME SEDUCED BY ALL KINDS OF CHEATERS, WHO ARE LOOKING FOR SUCH WEAK-WILLED DEVOTEES. THUS THESE UNCHASTE DEVOTEES WILL FALL PREY TO SO MANY BOGUS YOGIS. THEY WILL ACCEPT SO MANY COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT 'NEW AGE' LITERATURES AS 'SHASTRAS', THEY WILL FOLLOW SO MANY PHONY 'SAINTS / SADHUS' AND END UP TOTALLY CONFUSED AND UTTERLY LOST INSTEAD OF 'ENLIGHTENED'. SO FOR THE DEVOTEE WHO HAS NOT BEEN SPECIFICALLY CALLED AND ORDERED, AND EMPOWERED BY THEIR MASTER TO SERVE IN THE FIELD OF INTERFAITH SCHOLARSHIP AND DIALOGUE, IT IS THE SAFE COURSE TO FOCUS ON THE SPECIFIC 'SECTARIAN' LINEAGE CURRICULUM ASSIGNED BY THEIR ACARYA. THIS IS MY OPINION ABOUT DEVOTEES IN GENERAL. AS FAR AS THESE OTHER UNQUALIFIED JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN COMMENTATORS ARE CONCERNED, THEY ARE JUST CREATING OFFENCES AND HAVOC IN THE WORLD BY PREACHING AND WRITING SO MUCH OFFENSIVE NEW AGE INFLUENCED NONSENSE. BETTER THAT THEY SHOULD JUST BE SILENT AND GO BACK TO STUDYING SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS EXCLUSIVELY. IF SOME DEVOTEE HAS A LEGITIMATE CALLING AND EMPOWERMENT FOR INTERFAITH SERVICE, MY ADVISE IS RELEVANT FOR THEM: DO NOT TRY TO UNDERSTAND JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY OR OTHER ANCIENT TRADITIONS FROM MODERN OR NEW AGE COMMENTATORS. GO TO THE SOURCES OF EVIDENCE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AND ESPECIALLY READ THE SCRIPTURES OF THESE TRADITIONS IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THAT IS WHERE THE VAISHNAVA CONNECTIONS ARE VERY APPARENT. HARI BOL ! BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI vediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote: > Bhakti Ananda Prabhu > Hare Krsna! > All Glories to Srila Prabhupada > Pamho > > Just a few instructions from OUR GLORIOUS spiritual master His Divine Grace A C Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada will be enough to answer why many devotees do not wish take part in what you have suggested.----- No offense intended. Please read. Thank-you very much. > > 74-01-02. Letter: Bhumata > There is no other scripture which can compare to the Vedic scriptures so we should study these scriptures** exclusively**. When one becomes an initiated disciple although he has respect for the Christian Bible, nevertheless he must understand the Bhagavad-gita and must apply all study there and not spend time unnecessarily with other literatures. > > 69-11-02. Letter: Hamsaduta > Regarding your question about Lord Jesus Christ, we accept him as saktyavesa avatara. Lord Buddha is in the same category also. Lord Buddha is mentioned specifically in Srimad-Bhagavatam as incarnation of Godhead, and yet Vaisnavas do not accept his philosophy, which is classified as atheism. Similarly, even if we accept Lord Jesus Christ as saktyavesa avatara., it doesn't mean that we have to accept his philosophy. But we have all respects for him without fail. Regarding books like Aquarian Gospel or even the Testiments, we cannot accept them as authorities because sometimes it is learnt that the words are not actually spoken by Christ, but they are so set up by the devotees. For example, in the Ten Commandments it is clearly stated "Thou shalt not kill", but some Bishop in Boston has changed it to "Thou shalt do no murder". This means the Bishop wants to keep hold for animal slaughter. So don't bother about all these literatures. We have all respect for these great preachers, but we do not require to study books save and accept for some reference. We must push on our philosophy how to love God. **Our process is simple. We have got volumes of books also, so it is better for us to mind our own business than to divert our attention in the studies of other books. This was definitely forbidden by Lord Caitanya.** > > NBS 12 P Narada-bhakti-sutra > These ten principles of devotional service are the beginning. Additional principles are as follows: (11) One should avoid committing offenses against the holy name, the Deity, etc. (12) One should avoid associating with nondevotees. (13) One should not aspire to have many disciples. (14) One should not unnecessarily divert his attention by partially studying many books so as to appear very learned. For devotional service, it is sufficient to scrutinizingly study books like the Bhagavad-gita, the Srimad-Bhagavatam, and the Caitanya-caritamrta. (15) One should not be disturbed in either loss or gain. (16) One should not allow oneself to be overwhelmed by lamentation for any reason. (17) One should not blaspheme the demigods, although one should not worship them. Similarly, one should not criticize other scriptures, although one should not follow the principles therein. > > 690915LE.LON Lectures > You haven't got to study many books. You just simply study Bhagavad-gita As It Is. > > ys mahesh > > - > Bhakti Ananda Goswami > vediculture > Monday, March 07, 2005 9:38 AM > Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible > > > > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > PAMHO. > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. > > HOWEVER, THE CALVINIST AND RELATED PROTESTANT MISREADINGS OF THE > NEUTRAL JUDGMENT WORD "KRIMA", ALWAYS IN THE EXTREME NEGATIVE > AS "DAMNATION", IS WHY THE PROTESTANT BIBLES ARE SO HEAVY > ON "DAMNATION" AND 'HELLFIRE'. > > KRIMA [KARMA] AS GOD'S PERFECT "JUDGMENT" IS SUBJECTIVELY EXPERIENCED > AS EITHER 'GOOD' OR 'BAD'. A 'CRIMINAL' IS ONE UPON WHOM A 'NEGATIVE' > JUDGMENT HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED. HOWEVER, THE JEWISH AND CATHOLIC > TRADITIONS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT GOD'S JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS BOTH JUST AND > MERCIFUL. FURTHERMORE, THE UNIVERSAL MESSIAH JESUS CHRIST > DECLARES THAT "FOR JUDGMENT I AM COME INTO THIS WORLD" JOHN 9.39. > > SEE ALSO MATTHEW 7.2 "FOR WHAT JUDGMENT YOU JUDGE, YOU SHALL BE > JUDGED". > > (THERE ARE OVER 200 VERSES IN THE THREE JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS > TO STUDY IN THIS REGARD.) > > "CRITICCRISIS", "CRITERIACRITERION" ETC. ARE ALL "KRIMA" > RELATED WORDS IN THE ENGLISH. > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA- KRISHNA) > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) > > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI > > vediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote: > > Hare Krsna! > > All Glories to Srila Prabhupada! > > Pamho > > > > > > Dharmapad Prabhu wrote: > > "Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest > reincarnation?" > > > > ================================ > > > > If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- > someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave > this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards > reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. > Read the following: > > > > Jesus was walking with his disciples. > > > > In John 9:1-2 > > > > As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked > him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born > blind?" > > > > Note: the disciples are VERY specific as to the sin indicating > committed in PREVIOUS life): > > 1) this man OR > > 2) his parents > > > > which RESULTED of him being BORN blind. > > > > It appears at that time they UNDERSTOOD that Karma (sinful acts > performed in PREVIOUS life) which RESULTED they put down to TWO > SPECIFIC causes > > 1) this man OR > > 2) his parents > > > > So, although in THIS PARTICULAR case Jesus replies,"neither this > man or his parents but this happened so that the work of God might > be displayed in his life" > > > > BUT----- nevertheless no one can rule out the GENERAL ACCEPTED > UNDERSTANDING among the disciples that it WAS > > 1) this man OR > > 2) his parents > > > > OTHERWISE, --***WHY?***---- did they bother to ask SO SPECIFICALLY > > 1) this man OR > > 2) his parents > > > > Unless, THEY ALSO understood it MUST be-- ONE or the OTHER to have > been the CAUSE of sinning(reaction of Karma) PRIOR to his being--- > blind from birth. > > > > Hare Krishna! > > ys mahesh > > > > > > This is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome. > Remember, Vedic Culture is not an artificial imposition, but is the natural state of a society that is in harmony with God and the environment.Om Shantih, Harih Om > > Links Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 8, 2005 Report Share Posted March 8, 2005 Dear Bhakti Ananda Prabhu All Glories to Srila Prabhupada Pamho Hare Krsna! Regards "interfaith" preaching you mention-- Srila Prabhupada's solution and method is described below: 70-04-28. Letter: Citsukhananda Regarding the disturbing groups of "Christians" so-called, that is alright. Let them follow Lord Jesus Christ. Regarding their dogmatic insistence, everyone thinks like that, so if one is not prepared to advance more, it is better to avoid them. If one is limited by some formulas only, he is described as an animal which is bound up by the chain of the master and cannot move beyond the length of the chain. So we are concerned with persons who are not chained by anything. Srila Prabhupada only preached to these kind of people on the basis of giving-up meat eating . So long as they are merciless they can NOT understand the value of Krsna Consciousness what is soul, what is God. 730824BG.LON LecturesPrabhupada: Pariksit Maharaja. He said that God consciousness, Krsna consciousness, cannot be understood by the animal killer. Vina pasughnat. Nivrtta-tarsair upagiyamanat. You'll find those who are animal killers, the so-called Christians and Mohammedans, they cannot understand. They (are) simply fanatics. Cannot understand what is soul, what is God. They have got some theories and they are thinking we are religionists. What is sin, what is pious activities, these things are not understood by them because they are animal killers. It is not possible. Therefore Lord Buddha propagated ahimsa. Ahimsa. Because he saw the whole human race is going to hell by this animal killing. "Let me stop them so that they may, in future, they may become sober." Sadaya-hrdaya darsita: Two sides. First of all he was very much compassionate, that poor animals, they are being killed. And another side, he saw "The whole human race is going to hell. So let me do something." Therefore he had to deny the existence of the soul because their brain will not tolerate such things. Therefore he did not say anything about the soul or God. He said that "You stop animal killing." If I pinch you, you feel pain. So why should you give pain to others? Never mind he has no soul; that's all right. He did not talk anything about soul. So these people say the animals have no soul. But that's all right, but he's feeling pain when you are killing the animal. So you also feel pain. So why should you give pain to others? That is Lord Buddha's theory. Sadaya-hrdaya darsita-pasu-ghatam. Nindasi yajna-vidher ahaha sruti-jatam. He denied that: "I don't accept Vedas." Because in the Vedas there is sometimes recommendation, not for killing, but for giving rejuvenation to an animal. But killing, in that sense, is there for sacrifice. But Lord Buddha did not accept even animal killing in sacrifice. Therefore, nindasi. Nindasi means he was criticizing. Nindasi yajna-vidher ahaha sruti-jatam sadaya-hrdaya darsita. Why? He was so kind and compassionate. That is Krsna consciousness. God is very kind, very compassionate. He does not like. But when there is necessity, He can kill. But His killing and our killing is different. He's all good. Anyone killed by Krsna, he immediately gets salvation. So these thing are there. Hare Krsna! ys mahesh - Bhakti Ananda Goswami vediculture Tuesday, March 08, 2005 4:55 AM Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible HARE KRISHNA !SRILA PRABHUPADA KI JAYA! DEAR MAHESH PRABHU,PAMHO. (PLEASE EXCUSE MY WRITING IN ALL UPPER CASE, AS THESE LARGER LETTERS ARE EASIER FOR ME TO SEE.) I AM IN AGREEMENT WITH YOU THAT INITIATED DISCIPLES OF A MASTER SHOULD CONCENTRATE ON THE STUDIES PRESCRIBED FOR THEM BY THEIR MASTER. IN FACT, FOR OVER 30 YEARS I HAVE TOLD MANY DEVOTEES THAT THEY SHOULD OBEY SRILA PRABHUPADA AND READ BHAGAVAD-GITA, THEN SRIMAD-BHAGAVATAM, AND THEN CAITANYA-CARITAMRTA, AND SHOULD STRICTLY AVOID READING ALL OF THE NONSENSE 'NEW AGE' LITERATURES THAT THEY WERE READING.REGARDING MY OWN STUDIES, FROM THE BEGINNING OF MY SERVICE TO SRILA PRABHUPADA, IT WAS IN THE FIELD OF VAISHNAVA-JUDEO-CATHOLIC HISTORICAL AND COMPARATIVE STUDIES, AND AFTER OUR BELOVED SRILA PRABHUPADA DISAPPEARED, I WAS ACTUALLY BLESSED AND FORMALLY ANOINTED TO CARRY ON THIS 'INTERFAITH' SERVICE BY ACARYA PRABHAKAR MISHRA, SRILA PRABHUPADA'S FIRST DISCIPLE AND CO-FOUNDER OF THE ORIGINAL LEAGUE OF DEVOTEES. THE POINT OF MY POST WAS THAT RATHER THAN READ SO MANY VERY LATE PROTESTANT CORRUPTIONS OF THE AUTHENTIC JEWISH AND CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC SCRIPTURES, AND NONSENSE NEW AGE BOOKS LIKE THE SO-CALLED 'AQUARIAN GOSPEL' (WHICH IS A MODERN 'CHANNELED' WORK OF FICTION) AND SPECULATE ABOUT SUCH THINGS, IF IT IS NECESSARY TO STUDY SUCH SUBJECTS AS "KARMA" IN THE BIBLE, ONE SHOULD GO TO THE ACTUAL AUTHENTICALLY ANCIENT SOURCE MATERIALS. MY COMMENT IS NOT DIRECTED TO THE MANY INITIATED DEVOTEES WHO ARE CHASTELY STUDYING THEIR OWN GAUDIYA VAISHNAVA SCRIPTURES. IT IS DIRECTED TO THE PREACHERS AND SO-CALLED SCHOLARS AND RESEARCHISTS IN THE MOVEMENT, WHO INSIST ON WRITING AND TEACHING ABOUT JUDAISM AND / OR CATHOLICISM OR CHRISTIANITY, WHEN IN FACT THEY KNOW VERY LITTLE OR PRACTICALLY NOTHING ABOUT THESE TRADITIONS FROM ANY AUTHENTIC SOURCES. INSTEAD THESE SO-CALLED SCHOLARS HAVE OFTEN FILLED THEIR HEADS WITH NEO-GNOSTICISM OR WESTERN ESOTERIC TRADITION 'NEW AGE' IDEAS ABOUT JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY. HAVING DONE SO, THEY THEN MAKE COUNTLESS OFFENCES AGAINST GOD AND THE DEVOTEES OF THESE TRADITIONS, AS WELL AS EMBARRASSING THE VAISHNAVA TRADITION WITH THEIR MALEDUCATED AND PREJUDICIAL NONSENSE. WORST OF ALL, THEY HAVE BROUGHT THEIR NEW AGE NONSENSE INTO THE PURE VAISHNAVA TRADITION AND POLLUTED IT WITH ALL OF THEIR 'CHANNELED' PSYCHIC, THEOSOPHICAL SOCIETY RELATED 'ASCENDED MASTERS' AND 'ARYAN CHRIST' NEW AGE NONSENSE. SO I WOULD BE MUCH HAPPIER IF ALL THESE RASCALS WOULD JUST MIND THEIR OWN VAISHNAVA STUDIES AND LEAVE DISCUSSION OF THE JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION UP TO THOSE WHOSE SERVICE IT IS, AND WHO ARE ACTUALLY QUALIFIED FOR IT. SPIRITUAL CHASTITY IN ONE'S DEVOTIONAL LIFE IS EXTREMELY IMPORTANT. SRILA PRABHUPADA EMPHASIZED THIS PRINCIPLE FOR THE GOOD OF ALL OF HIS DISCIPLES. GURU, SHASTRA AND SADHU GUIDE THE FAITHFUL DISCIPLE IN AN AUTHENTIC 'APOSTOLIC' LINEAGE. TO ACHIEVE SUCCESS IN SUCH A LINEAGE REQUIRES AN UNDIVIDED DEVOTION. HOWEVER, IF THE DISCIPLE IS NOT 'SPIRITUALLY CHASTE', THEY WILL NOT BE SATISFIED WITH THEIR GURU OR SHASTRA OR THE SADHUS / SAINTS OF THEIR OWN TRADITION. THUS THEY WILL WANDER, EITHER IN THEIR THOUGHTS OR ACTUAL DEEDS, FROM THE STRAIGHT-AND-NARROW PATH MARKED OUT FOR THEM BY THEIR MASTER. IN THIS WANDERING MOOD, THEY WILL BECOME SEDUCED BY ALL KINDS OF CHEATERS, WHO ARE LOOKING FOR SUCH WEAK-WILLED DEVOTEES. THUS THESE UNCHASTE DEVOTEES WILL FALL PREY TO SO MANY BOGUS YOGIS. THEY WILL ACCEPT SO MANY COMPLETELY FRAUDULENT 'NEW AGE' LITERATURES AS 'SHASTRAS', THEY WILL FOLLOW SO MANY PHONY 'SAINTS / SADHUS' AND END UP TOTALLY CONFUSED AND UTTERLY LOST INSTEAD OF 'ENLIGHTENED'. SO FOR THE DEVOTEE WHO HAS NOT BEEN SPECIFICALLY CALLED AND ORDERED, AND EMPOWERED BY THEIR MASTER TO SERVE IN THE FIELD OF INTERFAITH SCHOLARSHIP AND DIALOGUE, IT IS THE SAFE COURSE TO FOCUS ON THE SPECIFIC 'SECTARIAN' LINEAGE CURRICULUM ASSIGNED BY THEIR ACARYA. THIS IS MY OPINION ABOUT DEVOTEES IN GENERAL. AS FAR AS THESE OTHER UNQUALIFIED JEWISH AND CHRISTIAN COMMENTATORS ARE CONCERNED, THEY ARE JUST CREATING OFFENCES AND HAVOC IN THE WORLD BY PREACHING AND WRITING SO MUCH OFFENSIVE NEW AGE INFLUENCED NONSENSE. BETTER THAT THEY SHOULD JUST BE SILENT AND GO BACK TO STUDYING SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS EXCLUSIVELY. IF SOME DEVOTEE HAS A LEGITIMATE CALLING AND EMPOWERMENT FOR INTERFAITH SERVICE, MY ADVISE IS RELEVANT FOR THEM:DO NOT TRY TO UNDERSTAND JUDAISM AND CHRISTIANITY OR OTHER ANCIENT TRADITIONS FROM MODERN OR NEW AGE COMMENTATORS. GO TO THE SOURCES OF EVIDENCE AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE, AND ESPECIALLY READ THE SCRIPTURES OF THESE TRADITIONS IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE. THAT IS WHERE THE VAISHNAVA CONNECTIONS ARE VERY APPARENT. HARI BOL !BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMIvediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote:> Bhakti Ananda Prabhu> Hare Krsna!> All Glories to Srila Prabhupada> Pamho> > Just a few instructions from OUR GLORIOUS spiritual master His Divine Grace A C Bhaktivedanta Swami Prabhupada will be enough to answer why many devotees do not wish take part in what you have suggested.----- No offense intended. Please read. Thank-you very much.> > 74-01-02. Letter: Bhumata> There is no other scripture which can compare to the Vedic scriptures so we should study these scriptures** exclusively**. When one becomes an initiated disciple although he has respect for the Christian Bible, nevertheless he must understand the Bhagavad-gita and must apply all study there and not spend time unnecessarily with other literatures.> > 69-11-02. Letter: Hamsaduta> Regarding your question about Lord Jesus Christ, we accept him as saktyavesa avatara. Lord Buddha is in the same category also. Lord Buddha is mentioned specifically in Srimad-Bhagavatam as incarnation of Godhead, and yet Vaisnavas do not accept his philosophy, which is classified as atheism. Similarly, even if we accept Lord Jesus Christ as saktyavesa avatara., it doesn't mean that we have to accept his philosophy. But we have all respects for him without fail. Regarding books like Aquarian Gospel or even the Testiments, we cannot accept them as authorities because sometimes it is learnt that the words are not actually spoken by Christ, but they are so set up by the devotees. For example, in the Ten Commandments it is clearly stated "Thou shalt not kill", but some Bishop in Boston has changed it to "Thou shalt do no murder". This means the Bishop wants to keep hold for animal slaughter. So don't bother about all these literatures. We have all respect for these great preachers, but we do not require to study books save and accept for some reference. We must push on our philosophy how to love God. **Our process is simple. We have got volumes of books also, so it is better for us to mind our own business than to divert our attention in the studies of other books. This was definitely forbidden by Lord Caitanya.**> > NBS 12 P Narada-bhakti-sutra> These ten principles of devotional service are the beginni ng.Additional principles are as follows: (11) One should avoid committing offenses against the holy name, the Deity, etc. (12) One should avoid associating with nondevotees. (13) One should not aspire to have many disciples. (14) One should not unnecessarily divert his attention by partially studying many books so as to appear very learned. For devotional service, it is sufficient to scrutinizingly study books like the Bhagavad-gita, the Srimad-Bhagavatam, and the Caitanya-caritamrta. (15) One should not be disturbed in either loss or gain. (16) One should not allow oneself to be overwhelmed by lamentation for any reason. (17) One should not blaspheme the demigods, although one should not worship them. Similarly, one should not criticize other scriptures, although one should not follow the principles therein.> > 690915LE.LON Lectures> You haven't got to study many books. You just simply study Bhagavad-gita As It Is.> > ys mahesh> > - > Bhakti Ananda Goswami > vediculture > Monday, March 07, 2005 9:38 AM> Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible> > > > > HARE KRISHNA !> > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA !> > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > PAMHO.> > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL]> > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. > > HOWEVER, THE CALVINIST AND RELATED PROTESTANT MISREADINGS OF THE > NEUTRAL JUDGMENT WORD "KRIMA", ALWAYS IN THE EXTREME NEGATIVE > AS "DAMNATION", IS WHY THE PROTESTANT BIBLES ARE SO HEAVY > ON "DAMNATION" AND 'HELLFIRE'. > > KRIMA [KARMA] AS GOD'S PERFECT "JUDGMENT" IS SUBJECTIVELY EXPERIENCED > AS EITHER 'GOOD' OR 'BAD'. A 'CRIMINAL' IS ONE UPON WHOM A 'NEGATIVE' > JUDGMENT HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED. HOWEVER, THE JEWISH AND CATHOLIC > TRADITIONS MAKE IT CLEAR THAT GOD'S JUDGMENT IS ALWAYS BOTH JUST AND > MERCIFUL. FURTHERMORE, THE UNIVERSAL MESSIAH JESUS CHRIST> DECLARES THAT "FOR JUDGMENT I AM COME INTO THIS WORLD" JOHN 9.39. > > SEE ALSO MATTHEW 7.2 "FOR WHAT JUDGMENT YOU JUDGE, YOU SHALL BE > JUDGED". > > (THERE ARE OVER 200 VERSES IN THE THREE JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS > TO STUDY IN THIS REGARD.)> > "CRITICCRISIS", "CRITERIACRITERION" ETC. ARE ALL "KRIMA" > RELATED WORDS IN THE ENGLISH. > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA-KRISHNA) > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.)> > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI > > --- In vediculture, "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> wrote:> > Hare Krsna!> > All Glories to Srila Prabhupada!> > Pamho> > > > > > Dharmapad Prabhu wrote:> > "Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest > reincarnation?"> > > > ================================> > > > If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- > someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave > this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards > reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. > Read the following:> > > > Jesus was walking with his disciples.> > > > In John 9:1-2> > > > As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked > him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born > blind?"> > > > Note: the disciples are VERY specific as to the sin indicating > committed in PREVIOUS life):> > 1) this man OR> > 2) his parents> > > > which RESULTED of him being BORN blind.> > > > It appears at that time they UNDERSTOOD that Karma (sinful acts > performed in PREVIOUS life) which RESULTED they put down to TWO > SPECIFIC causes > > 1) this man OR> > 2) his parents> > > > So, although in THIS PARTICULAR case Jesus replies,"neither this > man or his parents but this happened so that the work of God might > be displayed in his life"> > > > BUT----- nevertheless no one can rule out the GENERAL ACCEPTED > UNDERSTANDING among the disciples that it WAS > > 1) this man OR> > 2) his parents> > > > OTHERWISE, --***WHY?***---- did they bother to ask SO SPECIFICALLY > > 1) this man OR> > 2) his parents> > > > Unless, THEY ALSO understood it MUST be-- ONE or the OTHER to have > been the CAUSE of sinning(reaction of Karma) PRIOR to his being--- > blind from birth.> > > > Hare Krishna!> > ys mahesh> > > > > > This is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome.> Remember, Vedic Culture is not an artificial imposition, but is the natural state of a society that is in harmony with God and the environment.Om Shantih, Harih Om> > LinksThis is an information resource and discussion group for people interested in the World's Ancient Vedic Culture, with a focus on its historical, archeological and scientific aspects. Also topics about India, Hinduism, God, and other aspects of World Culture are welcome.Remember, Vedic Culture is not an artificial imposition, but is the natural state of a society that is in harmony with God and the environment.Om Shantih, Harih Om Links<*> To visit your group on the web, go to: vediculture/<*> To from this group, send an email to: vediculture<*> Your use of is subject to: Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 9, 2005 Report Share Posted March 9, 2005 Vrajananda das, Your perspective seems off the mark to me. The context that we have here is that this is a list dedicated to showing that many of the world's cultures are fragmentations of Vedic culture. Of course we want to study those cultures with thye purpose of depicting them in this light. Those instructions by Shrila Prabhupada were issued a long time ago in a certain context. Were it not for this context, we would have no call to go studying the Bible. I encourage Bhakti Anand Goswami to offer us more explanations so that we can better understand the world around us in its connecto to our world Vedic culture. Dharmapada Dasa vediculture, YVES FRANCES <yves.frances@c...> wrote: > > > > Bhakti Ananda proclaimed : > > > > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > > > PAMHO. > > > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. > > Vedic teachings are very clear about reincarnation . They're is no need > to follow your advice to understand this topic particularly when a > specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by > centuries of Council. > This judeo-centric conception of absolute truth is not exactly what > Srila Prabhupada or other great sages use to evoke for displaying > different features of karma , as birth and death. > > > > > > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] > > There is no doubt of existing few similarities between Vedas and jewish > historiography but mainly vaisnavas give not great credit to the last. > > > > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. > > Correct, all languages derive from prakrti, included hebrew , greek and > many different mlecchas languages. This caractere is to transform words > and meanings for misappropriation . Similarly Srila Prabhupada' book > are regularly revisited and "enlarged" but " fortunately" much less > distributed than original copies. > > > > > > > > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA- KRISHNA) > > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. > > > What a strange call for an Iskcon leader! Why don't you implore to read > Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam and book distribution?. > > > IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) > > Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) was certainly involved with > subterranean Nagas but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. He was > kicked out from the celestial abode and falling to the earth, he has > been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, his master, > with bear marrow in a submarine cave and taught him a kind of asuric > medicine, using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine.( I better > personally take shelter in Ayurveda). Later, Chiron as been killed by > Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. Sandipani Muni is the spiritual > master of Balaram and Krsna. Do you still feel part of Chiron sampradaya? > The snake of the caduceus, emblem of western medicine, refer to the > Nagaasuras,the use of venom for healing and not to Ananta Sesa. > Remember, brahmanical culture had big problem with the snakes, 3000 > years BC and probably still has. > So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted esoterism > rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . > > > > > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND > > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI > > Next time, will you teach us how vedas are deriving from Torah or > K'baal? You cannot be a representant of vedic culture with such > statements, Maharajah and your incomplete understanding of vedas as for > judeo-greek mythology you purposely mix with is not sufficient to > exhort people to follow your tri-decennial advice. > All your post is full of falsification. This is a sign of a confused > mind and I humbly urge you to rectify the situation before receiving the > unwanted reward in due course of time for polluting Iskcon and vedic > culture as many other bogus "gurus" got. > Your servant > Vrajananda das , Iskcon Revival Movement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Dear Dharmapada Prabhu, You should admit that followers of Srila Prabhupada may have their own understanding of his teachings since you have your personal approach of it, fitting the views of a particular intentions as to prove the authenticity of the Bible. As an ex-catholic I have also some knowledge in the Bible as well but I don't want to develop it for many reasons. First of all because Srila Prabhupada has instructed us not to read anything else of his 4 main books for spiritual and coherent understanding. Secondly , because we cannot be certain that the historiography is not biased, revisited and used for fulfilling not really vedic goals . Third, if SP instructions are 30 years old and can be obsolete as you seem to declare , how this ancient testament and other apocrypha can still be accurate after 2000 years of translation, addings and Councils. I can understand your desire to glorify a certain culture described as mlecchas culture in the Puranas, mlecchas meaning those who eat anything, but using the background and position that SP gave us is not fair and should be revealed to the public because this not the Iskcon mission. Better to put a jean , a shirt and a kippa and let down the tri danda for preaching such "research" to listeners who are struggling to demystify the ultimate "discoveries" as Aryan invasion or unlikely Hebraic avatars, bringing the mleccha culture in the first rank of civilizations. What said BAG is mostly wrong because , I made myself, after considering the systematics lies about contemporary new mleccha theology, studies about demonology for identifying the "enemies of Indra". My conclusion conduced by the conclusions of SP was that anything related with the mlecchas "upa"-scriptures is just an esoteric dark knowledge controlled by very clever yaksas and raksasas as Baal, Moloch, Ahi, Bel Zebub Aesclepios and others desert or Land of Snow "gods" and "buddhas" . As far Aesclepios is concerned , he cannot be assimilated with Ananta Balaram , Charaka, whose ayurvedic principles are completely opposite to the titan Chiron's disciple principles as incubation, poison and surgical practices. From Babylonia , the Brotherhood was called the Cult of the Snake, which later in Greece took its form as the Cult of Aesclepios. Ayurveda is a medicine for men, devotees and in many of the cases for the demigods. Aesclepios has nothing to do with Ayurveda and Charaka commentary. What I suspect is an enterprise of destruction of the understanding of the vedas as for the endeavor of Srila Prabhupada to reestablish its civilization. I only have a question to you and your friend BAG with whom you seem to exchange endless discussions : Below people will have an idea of your common thesis. http://www.saragrahi.org/Header%20Links/Articles%20By%20Author/Bhakti%20Anand%20\ Goswami/993%20Jesus%20in%20India%20Part%202a.htm So this question is: do you have completed a master in any branch? If my perspective seems off the mark to you is because you defend opposite views but my duty also is to detect and denounce untruth any time somebody wants to justify it with a tittle obtained by the mercy of Srila Prabhupada.What Maharaja said is wrong. Never Srila Prabhupada ask to anybody to educate people about demonology. I agree with you; many of the world's culture are fragmentations of vedic culture precisely for scattering it and finish it. What saints do is to reunite what has been separated, as SP came to preach to the mlecchas for a united vedic world in the 10 000 next years. His instructions remain for the moment , are completely accurate and bona fide for the actual context. You have the right to reject it but not to using it in another hand to validate endless speculations . Your servant Vrajananda das deandddd a écrit : > > Vrajananda das, > > Your perspective seems off the mark to me. The context that we have > here is that this is a list dedicated to showing that many of the > world's cultures are fragmentations of Vedic culture. Of course we > want to study those cultures with thye purpose of depicting them in > this light. > > Those instructions by Shrila Prabhupada were issued a long time ago > in a certain context. Were it not for this context, we would have no > call to go studying the Bible. > > I encourage Bhakti Anand Goswami to offer us more explanations so > that we can better understand the world around us in its connecto to > our world Vedic culture. > > Dharmapada Dasa > > > > > > vediculture, YVES FRANCES <yves.frances@c...> > wrote: > > > > > > > > Bhakti Ananda proclaimed : > > > > > > > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > > > > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > > > > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > > > > > PAMHO. > > > > > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA > HAS > > > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE > ACTUAL > > > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > > > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING > THE > > > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. > > > > Vedic teachings are very clear about reincarnation . They're is no > need > > to follow your advice to understand this topic particularly when a > > specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by > > centuries of Council. > > This judeo-centric conception of absolute truth is not exactly what > > Srila Prabhupada or other great sages use to evoke for displaying > > different features of karma , as birth and death. > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH > AND > > > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > > > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > > > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER > FAVORABLE > > > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > > > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > > > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > > > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] > > > > There is no doubt of existing few similarities between Vedas and > jewish > > historiography but mainly vaisnavas give not great credit to the > last. > > > > > > > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', > APOCRYPHA > > > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > > > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S > TRADITIONAL > > > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. > > > > Correct, all languages derive from prakrti, included hebrew , > greek and > > many different mlecchas languages. This caractere is to transform > words > > and meanings for misappropriation . Similarly Srila Prabhupada' > book > > are regularly revisited and "enlarged" but " fortunately" much less > > distributed than original copies. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > > > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA- > KRISHNA) > > > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. > > > > > > What a strange call for an Iskcon leader! Why don't you implore to > read > > Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam and book distribution?. > > > > > IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > > > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > > > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" > AS > > > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > > > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) > > > > Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) was certainly involved with > > subterranean Nagas but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. > He was > > kicked out from the celestial abode and falling to the earth, he > has > > been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, his > master, > > with bear marrow in a submarine cave and taught him a kind of > asuric > > medicine, using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine.( I better > > personally take shelter in Ayurveda). Later, Chiron as been killed > by > > Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. Sandipani Muni is the spiritual > > master of Balaram and Krsna. Do you still feel part of Chiron > sampradaya? > > The snake of the caduceus, emblem of western medicine, refer to > the > > Nagaasuras,the use of venom for healing and not to Ananta Sesa. > > Remember, brahmanical culture had big problem with the snakes, 3000 > > years BC and probably still has. > > So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted > esoterism > > rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . > > > > > > > > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > > > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH > AND > > > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > > > > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > > > > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI > > > > Next time, will you teach us how vedas are deriving from Torah or > > K'baal? You cannot be a representant of vedic culture with such > > statements, Maharajah and your incomplete understanding of vedas as > for > > judeo-greek mythology you purposely mix with is not sufficient to > > exhort people to follow your tri-decennial advice. > > All your post is full of falsification. This is a sign of a > confused > > mind and I humbly urge you to rectify the situation before > receiving the > > unwanted reward in due course of time for polluting Iskcon and > vedic > > culture as many other bogus "gurus" got. > > Your servant > > Vrajananda das , Iskcon Revival Movement > > > > Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 REINCARNATION IN THE BIBLE RESPONSE TO BEING ERRONEOUSLY CALLED AN "ISKCON LEADER", AND THE PREPOSTEROUS CRITICISMS OF MY ASCLEPIUS RESEARCH Message 6955 of 6957 YVES FRANCES <yves.frances@c...> Mon Mar 7, 2005 10:41 am Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible Bhakti Ananda proclaimed : > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > PAMHO. > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. Vedic teachings are very clear about reincarnation . They're is no need to follow your advice to understand this topic YOU ARE MISREPRESENTING MY ADVISE. IN MY ORIGINAL POST ABOUT THIS SUBJECT, I WAS RESPONDING TO DHARMAPAD PRABHU'S QUESTION BELOW. Message 6931 "Dean" <deandddd@u...> Fri Mar 4, 2005 10:51 am Reincarnation in the Bible Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation? Dharmapad MY ADVISE WAS FOR DEVOTEES, WHO ARE ALREADY INQUIRING ABOUT OR WRITING ABOUT THESE SUBJECTS, TO STOP SPECULATING ABOUT SUCH TEACHINGS IN THE "BIBLE", AND TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE ANCIENT GREEK SOURCES TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS ACTUALLY THERE. THE SEPTUAGINT AND APOCRYPHA ARE WIDELY AVAILABLE IN THE ANCIENT GREEK, AND IN RELIABLE INTERLINEAR TRANSLATIONS IN OTHER LANGUAGES FOR ANYONE WHO IS NOT ABLE TO READ ANCIENT GREEK. THESE GREEK JEWISH SCRIPTURES SHARE COMMON DEITY TITLES, THEOPHORIC NAMES AND RELIGIOUS TERM USAGES WITH 'NEW TESTAMENT' CATHOLIC (EARLY APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN)GREEK. ALL OF THESE GREEK JUDEO-CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES ARE STILL EXTANT IN AUTHENTICALLY ANCIENT COPIES AND PARTIAL COPIES, WHICH HAVE BEEN EXHAUSTIVELY STUDIED FROM VARIOUS PERSPECTIVES FOR CENTURIES. THUS EXCELLENT CONCORDANCES AND LEXICONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF THESE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC SOURCE WORKS. FURTHERMORE NUMEROUS ETYMOLOGICAL STUDIES HAVE BEEN DONE REVEALING IMPORTANT GREEK AND SANSKRIT SO-CALLED 'INDO-EUROPEAN COGNATES'. THE PROBLEM IS THAT BEFORE MY OWN 'BIBLICAL' GREEK AND KRISHNA-CENTRIC SANSKRIT COMPARISONS THAT FOCUSED ON THE RELATED TRADITIONS OF RHODA-KOUROS CENTERED MONOTHEISM IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AND SRI SRI RADHA-KRISHNA CENTERED MONOTHEISM IN THE EAST, NO OTHER VAISHNAVA SCHOLAR HAD ANALYZED THE SPECIFICALLY VAISHNAVA RELATED NAMES AND TERMS IN THE JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SCRIPTURES. IF RADHA-KRISHNA CENTRIC VAISHNAVA LINGUISTS WOULD SERIOUSLY STUDY THESE ANCIENT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC GREEK SCRIPTURES, THEY WOULD RECOGNIZED THEM AS BEING CLOSELY RELATED TO THE EASTERN VAISHNAVA TRADITION OF SRI SRI RADHA-KRISHNA. I HAVE NEVER RECOMMENDED VAISHNAVAS IN GENERAL TO TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE ANCIENT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES IN THE GREEK. I DID NOT RAISE THIS ISSUE ON VEDICULTURE, BUT SUGGESTED TO DHARMAPAD PRABHU THAT INSTEAD OF "...some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation?" DIRECT REFERENCE TO THESE GREEK SCRIPTURES WOULD PROVE VASTLY MORE HELPFUL, RESULTING IN HUNDREDS OF IMPORTANT CONNECTIONS. I SUGGESTED A PLACE TO START, WITH THE GREEK WORD "KRIMA", WHICH IS RELATED TO SANSKRIT "KARMA". MAHESH PRABHU CONTRIBUTED AN IMPORTANT NEW TESTAMENT REFERENCE RELEVANT TO THE SUBJECT. NEITHER DHARMAPAD OR MAHESH HAS BEEN CHASTISED BY YOU FOR THEIR APPARENT INTEREST IN, OR STUDY OF THE 'BIBLE'. Message 6932 of 6958 "Mahesh" <mahesh@a...> Fri Mar 4, 2005 2:49 pm Re: [world-vedic] Reincarnation in the Bible ...."If it helps.....I came across this---somewhere long time ago-- someone mentioned to me Srila Bhaktisiddhanta Saraswati Thakura gave this type reply about the **born blind ** quote regards reincarnation in Bible-- but I do not know if this is true or not. Read the following: Jesus was walking with his disciples. In John 9:1-2 As he went, he saw a blind man from birth. His disciples asked him "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?" [ETC.] YOU HAVE REPEATED THE IRRELEVANT CHARGE THAT "... particularly when a specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by centuries of Council." , WHICH HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH A STUDY OF THE AUTHENTIC INTERTESTAMENTAL JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SOURCES. BEYOND THESE EXTANT GREEK LITERATURES, WE HAVE COUNTLESS INSCRIPTIONS, NUMISMATIC, AND OTHER ANCIENT SOURCES OF GREEK TO STUDY FROM THE BACTRIAN ERA OF NORTH WEST INDIA TO EUROPE AND NORTH AFRICA. I ASSERT THAT OVER MILLENNIA THE ASCETIC HEBREWS, ISRAELITES AND JEWS WERE IN RELIGIOUS ALLIANCES WITH THE ASCETIC GREEK WORSHIPERS OF HELIOS (ELI-YAHU) KOUROS AND RHODA, AND THEIR HIEROPHANT BAL-THEOS, ON THE SACRED ISLE OF RHODES, AND THAT THIS SAME TRADITION IN INDIA WAS THE WORSHIP OF SRI SRI RADHA-KRISHNA AND BALADEVA. This judeo-centric conception of absolute truth is not exactly what Srila Prabhupada or other great sages use to evoke for displaying different features of karma , as birth and death. WHY WOULD THE GREAT SAGES OF ONE LINEAGE UNNECESSARILY GO OUTSIDE OF THEIR TRAINING TO STUDY AND REPRESENT THE TEACHINGS OF ANOTHER LINEAGE? HOW COULD THEY ACCURATELY REPRESENT ANOTHER LINEAGE UNLESS THEY WERE ALSO TRAINED AND QUALIFIED IN THE OTHER LINEAGE? WHY WOULD VAISHNAVA ACARYAS PREACHING EXCLUSIVELY INSIDE OF INDIA TO 'HINDUS' AND 'MUSLIMS' BECOME EXPERTS IN 'OLD TESTAMENT' APOCRYPHAL AND 'NEW TESTAMENT' GREEK? NOW, HOWEVER, DUE TO OUR GAUDIYA LINEAGE ACARYAS' HEROIC EFFORTS, ESPECIALLY SRILA PRABHUPADA'S INCOMPARABLE MISSIONARY ACTIVITIES, KRISHNA-CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM HAS EMERGED FROM MODERN INDIA AND ENCOUNTERED THE JUDEO-CATHOLIC AND RELATED BUT SEPARATED CHRISTIAN TRADITION ON ITS OWN HISTORIC TERRITORY. THIS BEGINS A NEW OPPORTUNITY FOR DIALOGUE AND UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE LEADERS AND SCHOLARS OF THESE TRADITIONS. SUCH A DIALOGUE CANNOT BE BASED ON PREJUDICIAL SPECULATION OR THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPT OR EVEN FICTITIOUS 'NEW AGE' 'SOURCES'. TO UNDERSTAND THE GREAT EASTERN KRISHNA-CENTRIC BHAKTI TRADITIONS, ONE MUST STUDY THEIR AUTHENTIC GURU SHASTRA AND SADHU LINEAGES. TO UNDERSTAND THE GREAT 'WESTERN' ELI-YAHU KOUROS-CENTRIC BHAKTI TRADITIONS, THE SAME PRINCIPLE APPLIES. I AM MERELY SUPPORTING THE PRINCIPLE OF UNDERSTANDING A TRADITION, BY STUDYING THE AUTHENTIC ANCIENT SOURCES AND HONORING THE SAINTS AND LIVING AUTHORITIES OF THE TRADITION, INSTEAD OF JUST SPECULATING ABOUT IT FROM OUTSIDE AND INAUTHENTIC 'EVIDENCE' OR EVEN LATE AND HOSTILE OUTSIDE COMMENTATORS. > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] There is no doubt of existing few similarities between Vedas and jewish historiography IF YOU ONLY KNOW OF A "few similarities", THEN YOU HAVE A PROFOUNDLY POOR FUND OF KNOWLEDGE ON THE SUBJECT, AND YOU ARE THUS COMPLETELY UNQUALIFIED TO SPEAK OR WRITE ON THE SUBJECT. but mainly vaisnavas give not great credit to the last. THAT IS BECAUSE THEY ARE MAINLY UNEDUCATED OR MALEDUCATED REGARDING THE JUDEO-CATHOLIC TRADITION. > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. Correct, all languages derive from prakrti, included hebrew , greek and many different mlecchas languages. This caractere is to transform words and meanings for misappropriation . IS THIS A CHARGE OF ILL-MOTIVATED "misappropriation" AGAINST ENTIRE PEOPLES? WHY MUST YOU ATTACK THE CHARACTER AND MOTIVATION OF ENTIRE PEOPLES, WHICH YOU APPARENTLY KNOW LITTLE OR NOTHING ABOUT? Similarly Srila Prabhupada' book are regularly revisited and "enlarged" but " fortunately" much less distributed than original copies. NOW YOU ARE SUGGESTING SIMILARITIES TO THE EDITORIAL REVISIONS OF SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS. THERE IS NO SIMILARITY BETWEEN THE NATURAL AND DYNAMIC EXISTENCE OF LIVING LANGUAGE FAMILIES AND THEIR BRANCHES, AND THE EDITORIAL CHANGES MADE TO SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS. PERHAPS YOU THINK THAT 'THE BIBLE' AS YOU KNOW IT HAS BEEN RUINED BY SUCH ALTERATIONS. FOR YOU THIS IS THE INAUTHENTIC LITERATURE CHANGED BY "CENTURIES OF COUNCIL", AS YOU HAVE CHARGED ABOVE. "...when a specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by centuries of Council." HOWEVER, THE CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH FLOURISHED IN ITS EARLY CENTERS AT JERUSALEM, EDESSA, BYZANTIUM, ROME AND ALEXANDRIA, AND EACH OF THESE CENTERS HAD THEIR OWN APOSTOLIC AUTHORITIES, RITES, LITANY OF SAINTS / MASTERS AND CANON OF SACRED SCRIPTURE AND COMMENTARY / TRADITIONAL LITERATURE, IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES. THUS THE SCRIPTURAL HERITAGE OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH IS NOT JUST IN GREEK OR LATIN, BUT IN THE LANGUAGES OF THESE OTHER CENTERS AS WELL. FOR EXAMPLE THE LANGUAGE OF EGYPTIAN CATHOLICISM (THE RITE OF SAINT MARK OF ALEXANDRIA) IS COPTIC. THIS RITE (RITYA LINEAGE) SPREAD TO ETHIOPIA, WHERE THE SCRIPTURES WERE IN GEEZ. THE SCRIPTURES TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE OTHER CATHOLIC RITES / APOSTOLIC LINEAGES ALSO APPEARED IN DIFFERENT LANGUAGES. HOWEVER, IN SPITE OF ALL OF THIS DIFFERENCE, THERE WAS ALWAYS A TRANSCENDENT UNITY IN THE DIVERSITY OF THE CATHOLIC COMMUNION. IF YOU ARE DRAWING AN ANALOGY BETWEEN CATHOLIC HISTORY AND ISKCON HISTORY, THERE IS NO COMPARISON. HOWEVER, SOME OF THE PROTESTANT 'REFORMERS' DID SUBSTANTIALLY CHANGE THEIR VERSION OF THE 'BIBLE' IN ORDER TO BRING IT INTO ALIGNMENT WITH THEIR OWN DOCTRINES. THAT IS WHY I RECOMMEND STUDYING THE EARLIEST TEXTS AVAILABLE IN THE VARIOUS CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC LINEAGES. YOU SEEM HOSTILE TO ME FOR NO GOOD REASON. FOR THE RECORD, I HAVE DISTRIBUTED MANY OF SRILA PRABHUPADA'S ORIGINAL BOOKS, AND AS A TEXTUAL SCHOLAR AND HISTORIAN OF RELIGION, I HAVE NEVER APPROVED OF REDACTING AND REPUBLISHING ANY UNAUTHORIZED VERSIONS OF ANY WORK UNDER THE ORIGINAL AUTHOR'S NAME. IF SUBSEQUENT EDITIONS NEED TYPOS CORRECTED, ADDITIONS OR COMMENT, THESE SHOULD BE ADDED SEPARATELY AS FOOTNOTES, SET COMPLETELY APART FROM THE ORIGINAL TEXT, AND CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AS THE WORK OR REMARKS OF THE DIFFERENT EDITOR OR COMMENTATOR. > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA- KRISHNA) > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. What a strange call for an Iskcon leader! I AM A DISCIPLE OF SRILA PRABHUPADA, AND I AM A SANNYASI, BUT I AM NOT EVEN AN "ISKCON" MEMBER, WHAT TO SPEAK OF AN "Iskcon leader"! APPARENTLY YOU DO NOT BOTHER TO UNDERSTAND THE FIRST THING ABOUT SOMEONE BEFORE YOU PRE-JUDGE THEM AND LASH-OUT AT THEM FOR SOME IMAGINED STATUS, ATTITUDE OR OFFENCE. Why don't you implore to read Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam and book distribution?. WHY DO YOU ASSUME THAT I DO NOT??? HOW CAN ANYONE MAKE THE ANCIENT GREEK-JUDEO-CATHOLIC-VAISHNAVA COMPARISONS THAT I AM ENCOURAGING THE STUDY OF, WITHOUT REFERRING TO THE BHAGAVAD-GITA AS IT IS, AND THE SRIMAD BHAGAVATAM? HOW CAN ANYONE GET THESE BOOKS IN THEIR LANGUAGES, WITH THE SANSKRIT TO COMPARE, WITHOUT RECOURSE TO SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS? > IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? was certainly involved with subterranean Nagas ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? He was kicked out from the celestial abode ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? and falling to the earth, ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? he has been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? his master, with bear marrow ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? in a submarine cave ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? and taught him a kind of asuric medicine, ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine. ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? ( I better personally take shelter in Ayurveda). ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? Later, Chiron as been killed by Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. ACCORDING TO WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE, EVIDENCE OR MODERN AUTHORITY? Sandipani Muni is the spiritual master of Balaram and Krsna. DID I STATE ANYWHERE THAT SANDIPANI MUNI SHOULD BE REPLACED WITH CHIRON? WHY ARE YOU CONFUSING TWO DIFFERENT TRADITIONS? OUR ONE GOD HAS UNLIMITED NAMES FORMS AND TRADITIONS, BUT WE STILL RECOGNIZE THAT AS VAISHNAVAS WE ARE WORSHIPING THE SAME DEITY WHEN WE WORSHIP SRI KRISHNA, SRI RAMA, LORD NARAHARI, LORD VARAHA, LORD HAYAGRIVA, ETC. AS VAISHNAVAS, WE ARE ABLE TO UNDERSTAND THE PRESENCE OF OUR LORD IN DIFFERENT LILAS, IN SPITE OF SUCH PROFOUND DIFFERENCES. IN INDIA THERE ARE ALSO NUMEROUS REGIONAL AND ETHNIC WRITTEN VERSIONS OF THE SAME DEITY'S PASTIMES AND COUNTLESS ORAL TRADITIONS ABOUT THE SAME LILAS, BUT THESE DO NOT INVALIDATE THE DEVOTION OF THE DEVOTEES OF THESE VARIOUS VAISHNAVA TRADITIONS. THEN THERE ARE HOSTILE GROUPS WITH THEIR HERETICAL AND CORRUPT IDEAS / TEACHINGS ABOUT THE SUPREME LORD. MAYAVADIS CLAIM THAT SRI KRISHNA IS A MAYAVADI 'SELF REALIZED' (OR 'ASCENDED') MASTER, WHO TAUGHT IMPERSONALISM IN HIS GITA ! VARIOUS SCHOOLS OF JAINS AND THERAVADIN BUDDHISTS TEACH THAT SRI KRISHNA IS A DEMON, BEING PUNISHED IN A HELL FOR STARTING THE GREAT WAR. THE SAHAJIYAS AND SEX- TANTRICS HAVE THEIR SELF-APPOINTED FRAUDULENT "KRISHNAS" WHO ARE SIMPLY LUSTY MEN WANTING TO HAVE SEX WITH THEM....BUT WE DO NOT CONFUSE SUCH NONSENSE HERETICAL 'KRISHNAS' WITH OUR TRANSCENDENT DEITY. IN THE SAME WAY, NO ASCETIC HELIOPOLITAN MONOTHEIST WORSHIPER OF RHODA-KOUROS AND ASCLEPIUS WOULD EVER CONFUSE THEIR OWN TRANSCENDENT AND WORLD-SAVING DEITY WITH THE DEBASED VERSIONS OF THE SO-CALLED MYTHOLOGICAL 'ASCLEPIUS' THAT YOU CITE ABOVE. Do you still feel part of Chiron sampradaya? FOR YOUR INFORMATION, THROUGHOUT THE RANGE OF NORTHERN PURE LAND (PL) RELATED BUDDHISM, THERE IS A CONNECTION BETWEEN THE BUDDHIST SHASTRAS AND HAYAGRIVA LOKESHVARA, THE HORSE-HEADED FORM OF THE SUPREME ADI BUDDHA, IN HIS SECOND PERSON (AVALOKITESHVARA / VISHNU). THIS SCRIPTURAL TRADITION IS ALSO RELATED TO THE P L BUDDHIST MEDICAL TRADITION OF AYUR VEDA. THUS IN THE EAST, THIS ANCIENT AND UNIVERSAL MEDICAL TRADITION OF THE WORLD-SAVING GREAT PHYSICIAN IS CONNECTED TO BOTH THE CULTUS OF ANANTA SESHA NAGA, AND HAYAGRIVA. IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION THE MEDICAL LINEAGE OF THE HORSE-MAN CHIRON IS RELATED TO THAT OF THE EASTERN HORSE-MAN HAYAGRIVA, AND THE SERAPHIC NAHASH FORM OF ASCLEPIUS IS RELATED TO ANANTA SESHA NAGA. THE BEARDED RENUNCIATE FORM OF ASCLEPIUS IS RELATED TO THE BEARDED MENDICANT HEALER FORM OF LORD BALADEVA AS CARAKA. ABOVE YOU HAVE MADE THE MISTAKE OF THINKING THAT YOUR SMALL HODGE PODGE OF MYTHOLOGICAL IDEAS AND ASURIC SPECULATIONS ABOUT ASCLEPIUS IS SOME KIND OF DEFINITIVE STATEMENT ON THE SUBJECT. HOWEVER, YOU HAVE ONLY EXPOSED YOUR UTTER LACK OF QUALIFICATION TO EVEN BEGIN TO ENGAGE IN A SERIOUS DIALOGUE ON THIS SUBJECT. FURTHERMORE, WHILE I HAVE DIRECTLY STUDIED THE INTERDISCIPLINARY EVIDENCE OF ANANTA- BALARAMA'S GREAT PHYSICIAN WORSHIP FOR OVER 30 YEARS, YOU ARE APPARENTLY REPEATING THE ILL-INFORMED AND PREJUDICIAL CONCLUSIONS OF SOME OTHER UNNAMED PERSON. EVEN AT THAT, WHY HAVE YOU BEEN STUDYING SUCH NONSENSE INSTEAD OF SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS? AT LEAST WHEN I HAVE STUDIED ANANTA-BALARAMA AS CARAKA, ASCLEPIUS-IASAS (JESUS), AESCULAPIUS, SERAPIS, YAKUSHI-JI, ESHMUN, ETC. I HAVE GONE TO THE SOURCES AND STUDIED THE EVIDENCE MYSELF. THUS MY KNOWLEDGE IS BASED ON DIRECT PERSONAL EXPERIENCE WITH THE EVIDENCE, NOT SOME OTHER RESEARCHISTS' SUMMARY OR COMMENTARY / CONCLUSION. IN THE 1960S AND 1970S I READ HUNDREDS OF ANCIENT SOURCE WORK REFERENCES TO ASCLEPIUS IN THE ORIGINAL LANGUAGES. DID YOU STUDY GREEK AND LATIN SO THAT YOU COULD DO THIS ? AT THAT TIME I BECAME FAMILIAR WITH THE ENTIRE BODY OF EXTANT GRECO-ROMAN LITERATURES REGARDING ASCLEPIUS / AESCULAPIUS. SO WOULD YOU PLEASE TELL ME WHAT ANCIENT SOURCE WORK STATES THE FOLLOWING: Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) ARE YOU FAMILIAR WITH THE MANY VERSIONS OF HIS NAME AND THE VARIETY OF THEIR INTERPRETATIONS? APPARENTLY NOT. was certainly involved with subterranean Nagas AND THESE "SUBTERRANEAN NAGAS", WHICH GRECO-ROMAN SOURCE DESCRIBES THEM, GIVE DETAILS PLEASE, AND DO NOT FOIST SOME SO-CALLED 'VEDIC' ASURIC INTERPRETATION ON THEM. but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. IF YOU HAVE NO FAMILIARITY WITH THE DIRECT EVIDENCE THAT I HAVE STUDIED, HOW CAN YOU MAKE SUCH A STATEMENT? He was kicked out from the celestial abode and falling to the earth, WHAT IS YOUR SOURCE FOR THIS STATEMENT? he has been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, his master, with bear marrow in a submarine cave and taught him a kind of asuric medicine, using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine. IT IS AMAZING HOW MANY NOVEL IDEAS YOU HAVE DERIVED FROM YOUR SUPPOSEDLY DIRECT READINGS IN THE ANCIENT SOURCES....SUCH AS ASCLEPIUS TAUGHT ASURIC POISON MEDICINE, "ancestor of the modern medicine." ( I better personally take shelter in Ayurveda). APPARENTLY YOU ALSO KNOW NOTHING OF THE MANY AYUR-VEDIC RELATED MEDICAL PRACTICES OF THE ASCLEPIADS. ASCLEPIUS PREFERRED TO TEACH HYGIENE AND ASCETICISM ABOVE ALL AS PREVENTATIVE MEDICINE. THE HELIOS- ASCLEPIUS WORSHIPING MONOTHEISTIC ASCETICS OF THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION, INCLUDING THE JEWS LIKE THE NAZIRITES AND ESSENES, ABSTAINED FROM FLESH EATING, INTOXICATION, ILLICIT SEX AND GAMING (GAMBLING), WHICH WAS A POPULAR VICE IN THE REGION. SUCH ASCETICISM CONTINUED RIGHT THROUGH THE ROMAN TIME OF GALEN AND INTO THE CATHOLIC RELIGIOUS ORDERS. IN FACT THE FIRST CATHOLIC MONASTIC 'RULES OF ORDER' WERE BASED ON THE ANCIENT ASCETICAL DISCIPLINES OF THE HELENO-SEMITIC MONOTHEISTIC WORSHIPERS OF HELIOS-ASCLEPIUS. Later, Chiron as been killed by Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. YOU ARE CONFOUNDING MANY DIFFERENT STORIES FROM DIFFERENT SOURCES AND REGARDING DIFFERENT PERSONALITIES. WHO IS YOUR SOURCE FOR SO MUCH CONFUSION? Do you still feel part of Chiron sampradaya? I HAVE CERTAINLY NEVER FELT PART OF YOUR IMAGINED "Chiron sampradaya" ! The snake of the caduceus, emblem of western medicine, refer to the Nagaasuras,the use of venom for healing and not to Ananta Sesa. SO AGAIN YOU ARE STATING THIS AS FACT, BASED UPON WHAT DIRECT EVIDENCE THAT YOU HAVE PERSONALLY INVESTIGATED? OR IF YOU ARE REPEATING THIS BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S RESEARCH OR CONCLUSION, WHO IS YOUR AUTHORITY? I THINK THAT YOU HAVE BEEN COMPLETELY BRAIN-WASHED INTO THIS IDEA BY SOME EASTERN OR ANTI-SEMITIC 'NEW AGE' SELF- APPOINTED AUTHORITY, WHO HAS A PROFOUND PREJUDICE TOWARDS THE WESTERN OR JUDEO-CHRISTIAN TRADITION, AND WHO HAS THUS INTERPRETED THE ENTIRE TRADITION AS ASURIC. UNFORTUNATELY SUCH BLIND PREJUDICE IS WHAT HAS PREVENTED THE VAISHNAVAS OF THE EAST FROM RECOGNIZING THE VAISHNAVAS OF THE WEST AND VISA VERSA. Remember, brahmanical culture had big problem with the snakes, 3000 years BC and probably still has. YES AND THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BALADEVA AS ANANTA SESHA NAGA AND THE DEMON KALIYA ETC. IN THE EAST IS JUST AS CLEAR AS THE DISTINCTION BETWEEN BALA-YAHU THE SERAPHIC CHRIST AND HIS ADVERSARY THE SERPENT ANTI-CHRIST IN THE HELENO-SEMITIC BIBLICAL TRADITION. So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted esoterism rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . I HAVE NOT SPECULATED ABOUT ANYTHING, BUT RATHER I HAVE TAKEN THE TIME AND EFFORT TO BECOME QUALIFIED AND TO STUDY THE SOURCES DIRECTLY TO AVOID ANY POSSIBILITY OF BEING BLINDED BY SOMEONE ELSE'S PREJUDICED OR ERRONEOUS PERCEPTION , OR INFLUENCED BY THEIR CONCLUSIONS. SPECULATION ENDS WHERE DIRECT KNOWLEDGE BEGINS. YOU DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE ANY DIRECT KNOWLEDGE ON THE SUBJECT OF LORD ANANTA-BALADEVA'S ANCIENT AND UNIVERSAL WORSHIP AS THE WORLD-SAVING GREAT PHYSICIAN. YOU HAVE NOT READ THE SOURCE LITERATURES OR INSCRIPTIONS, READ HUNDREDS OF BOOKS AND TRAVELED AROUND THE WORLD TO SEE ART AND ARTIFACTS RELATED TO HIS TRADITIONS IN MUSEUMS AND FIELD STUDIES. YOU HAVE NOT STUDIED THE MANY RITES AND PRACTICES RELATED TO HIM, OR HIS TEMPLE-UNIVERSITIES OR THE POLITICAL ASYLA FEDERATIONS DEVOTED TO HIS WORSHIP. YOU HAVE NOT TRACED HIS WORSHIP THROUGH THOUSANDS OF YEARS AND ACROSS THOUSANDS OF MILES, THROUGH MANY CULTURES, AS I HAVE. BASED ON A POOR FUND OF VERY BIASED 'KNOWLEDGE' (ASSUMING HIS WESTERN TRADITION IS ASURIC!), YOU ARE STILL SPECULATING ABOUT ASCLEPIUS, BUT I AM IN POSSESSION OF MUCH DIRECT, 'REALIZED' KNOWLEDGE ON THE HISTORY, THEOLOGY AND PRACTICES OF HIS WORSHIP. FOR OVER 30 YEARS I HAVE CAREFULLY TRACED-OUT THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN ITS WESTERN AND EASTERN FORMS. BUT INSTEAD OF TAKING ADVANTAGE OF MY SERVICE IN THIS AREA, YOU, LIKE MANY OTHER CLOSE-MINDED AND PUFFED-UP KNOW-IT-ALL DEVOTEES, HAVE REJECTED MY SERVICE, BECAUSE YOU THINK THAT YOU ALREADY KNOW MORE THAN I DO. IN FACT, I HAVE FOUND THAT WHENEVER I DARE TO SPEAK UP IN A VAISHNAVA FORUM SUCH AS THIS, I GET REACTIONS SUCH AS YOURS, FROM PREJUDICED PEOPLE LIKE YOU, WHO CHASTISE ME FOR MY SUPPOSEDLY DEVIANT STUDIES OR MINISTRY, BUT THEN WHO GO ON TO ASSERT THAT THEY ARE GREATER EXPERTS ABOUT JUDEO-CHRISTIAN HISTORY AND THEOLOGY THAN I AM ! So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted esoterism rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . EXCUSE ME FOR STANDING UP TO YOUR UNFOUNDED ACCUSATIONS, BUT 100% OF MY EVIDENCE IS FROM MY DIRECT GRADUATE AND POST-GRADUATE LEVEL INTERDISCIPLINARY RESEARCH INVESTIGATING AUTHENTIC ANCIENT SOURCES, WHILE YOUR ARROGANT AND PREJUDICIAL STATEMENTS ABOVE ARE CLEARLY BASED ON SOMEONE ELSE'S SUPERFICIAL RESEARCH AND ERRONEOUS, ANT- SEMITIC ESOTERIC TRADITION RELATED CONCLUSIONS. never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . MY RESEARCH HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED PERSONALLY BY ACARYA PRABHAKAR MISHRA, WHO FORMALLY ANOINTED AND BLESSED ME TO CARRY ON THE NON SECTARIAN UNIFYING WORK OF THE ORIGINAL LEAGUE OF DEVOTEES THAT OUR BELOVED SRILA PRABHUPADA FOUNDED WITH HIM IN JHANSI. ACARYA PRABHAKAR MISHRA PERSONALLY ASSURED ME THAT SRILA PRABHUPADA WAS VERY PLEASED WITH MY SCHOLARLY SERVICE, AND WAS EMPOWERING ME TO REVEAL THE CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE GREAT KRISHNA-CENTRIC BHAKTI TRADITIONS OF THE EAST AND WEST. UNFORTUNATELY THE EXTREME ANTI-JEWISH AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN PREJUDICE OF MANY DEVOTEES HAS COMPELLED THEM TO REJECT MY SERVICE AND TO PERSONALLY ATTACK ME IN WORD AND DEED FOR DECADES. BEING WEARY AFTER OVER 30 YEARS OF SUCH ABUSE, I HAVE THIS YEAR LEFT MY POSITION WITH THE WORLD VAISHNAVA ASSOCIATION, AND HAVE RETIRED FROM MOST OF MY PREVIOUS PREACHING ACTIVITIES TO THE VAISHNAVA COMMUNITY. THE UNEDUCATED BUT PUFFED-UP AND PREJUDICIAL ABUSE THAT YOU HAVE HEAPED UPON ME IN THIS FORUM, JUST BECAUSE I TRIED TO GIVE DHARMAPAD AND MAHESH PRABHUS SOME ADVISE ABOUT USING SOURCE WORKS, IS A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF WHY I HAVE WITHDRAWN MYSELF FROM THE ABUSIVE ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE LIKE YOURSELF. YOU DO NOT KNOW ANYTHING ABOUT ME. YOU EVEN CALLED ME AN ISKCON LEADER, WHEN I HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH ISKCON! WORST OF ALL, IN YOUR ARROGANT IGNORANCE YOU HAVE HEAPED INSULT AND ABUSE UPON THE LORD HIMSELF, AND UPON HIS WESTERN DEVOTEES. YOU HAVE CALLED THE LORD AND HIS WESTERN DEVOTEES ASURIC, MEANING DEMONIC. YOU HAVE LUMPED-IN THE DIVINE AND DEMONIAC IN THE WESTERN TRADITIONS, AND MADE NO DISTINCTION BETWEEN THE TWO, DAMNING THEM ALTOGETHER. YOU ARE A PERFECT EXAMPLE OF THE KIND OF PERSON WHO SHOULD ONLY READ SRILA PRABHUPADA'S BOOKS AND WHO SHOULD NEVER ATTEMPT TO STUDY THE WESTERN BHAKTI TRADITIONS, BECAUSE YOU CANNOT STUDY THEM OBJECTIVELY. PERHAPS YOU HAVE DEVELOPED SOME PERSONAL HATRED FOR THE JUDEO- CHRISTIAN TRADITION, WHICH HAS PREDISPOSED YOU TO ADOPTING THE WORST POSSIBLE VIEW OF IT. IN THAT CASE, YOU SHOULD DEFINITELY TRY TO LIMIT YOUR OFFENCES BY ABSORBING YOURSELF IN YOUR OWN INSPIRING DEVOTIONAL SEVA, STUDIES, PRACTICES, SO THAT YOU CAN AVOID OFFENCES AND MAKE THE BEST POSSIBLE PROGRESS IN YOUR SPIRITUAL LIFE. WHEN I STUDY THE RELIGIOUS HISTORY OF HUMANITY, IT CONSTANTLY REMINDS ME OF THE LORD AND HIS LOVING RELATIONSHIPS WITH HIS GREAT DEVOTEES. THUS I BECOME VERY ENLIVENED TO SEE HOW HE HAS CARRIED ON SO MANY LIMITLESS LOVING PASTIMES WITH ALL KINDS OF DEVOTEES THROUGHOUT HISTORY. YES THERE ARE THOSE WHO OPPOSE HIM IN EVERY TIME AND PLACE. BUT IT IS EASY TO SORT THE DEVOTEES OUT FROM THE DEMONS IF ONE IS OBJECTIVE. HOWEVER, IF ONE IS PREJUDICED, THEN THEY WILL NOT UNDERSTAND THE HISTORY OF THE JEWS, CHRISTIANS, EGYPTIANS, ETC. INSTEAD THEY WILL MAKE THE OFFENSIVE MISTAKE OF LUMPING-IN THE DEVOTEES AND THE DEMONS, JUST BECAUSE THEY ARE OF A CERTAIN RACE OR TONGUE. ASSUMING THAT A WHOLE CIVILIZATION OR RACE IS ASURIC, SUCH BIASED DEVOTEES WILL NEVER BE ABLE TO RECOGNIZE THE LORD OR HIS UNFAMILIAR DEVOTEES IN SUCH A CIVILIZATION. Next time, will you teach us how vedas are deriving from Torah or K'baal? WHY DO YOU MAKE SUCH 'STRAW MAN' ATTACKS ON ME AND DISTORT MY TEACHINGS? You cannot be a representant of vedic culture with such statements, WHEN DID I EVER MAKE "such statements," Maharajah and your incomplete understanding of vedas YOU DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT THE "VEDAS" ARE. YEDA AND OIDA ARE THE HEBREW AND GREEK BIBLICAL WORDS FOR GOD'S REVEALED KNOWLEDGE !!! THESE WORDS ARE USED FOR GOD'S REVEALED KNOWLEDGE HUNDREDS OF TIMES IN THE GREEK AND HEBREW JUDEO-CATHOLIC AND THE GREEK HELIOPOLITAN SOURCES. IN HIS GITA, SRI KRISHNA SAYS THAT BY ALL OF THE VEDAS HE IS TO BE KNOWN !!!! ARE WE TO THINK THAT HE DID NOT KNOW THAT THE ORIGINAL HELIOPOLITAN GREEK AND GREEK AND HEBREW JUDEO-CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES WERE ALSO "VEDA"? THE HEBREW AND GREEK BIBLICAL WORDS YEDA AND OIDA AND THEIR DERIVATIVES HAVE THE VERY SAME MEANINGS AS VEDA AND ITS DERIVATIVE WORDS IN THE SANSKRIT. SO WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT BY ALL OF THE VEDAS KRISHNA IS TO BE KNOWN? SINCE THE GREEK AND JEWISH HEBREW SCRIPTURES ARE OIDA AND YEDA, OBVIOUSLY SRI KRISHNA IS TO BE KNOWN BY THEM. SRI KRISHNA SAID SO HIMSELF. as for judeo-greek mythology you purposely mix with is not sufficient to exhort people to follow your tri-decennial advice. YOU ARE THE ONE WHO MIXED MYTHOLOGY. MY WORK CONCENTRATES ON HISTORY AND SCHOOLS OF THEOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY, NOT MIXED FRAGMENTS OF MYTHOLOGIES, SUCH AS YOU HAVE COBBLED-TOGETHER IN YOUR RIDICULOUS SUMMARY HEREIN REGARDING ASCLEPIUS. All your post is full of falsification. YOUR ACCUSATIONS AGAINST ME ARE FALSE. YOU HAVE NOT RESPONDED TO THE REAL PERSON THAT I AM, OR TO MY REAL RESEARCH, OR TO MY ACTUAL HISTORY OF SERVICE AND PREACHING IN THE MOVEMENT, BUT INSTEAD YOU HAVE CREATED A 'STRAW MAN' OUT OF ME TO ATTACK. THEN YOU HAVE VICIOUSLY ATTACKED ME, AS THIS INVENTED "BHAKTI ANANDA", OVER A COLLECTION OF NONSENSE ABOUT ASCLEPIUS AND BASELESS ACCUSATIONS ABOUT MYSELF. This is a sign of a confused mind and I humbly urge you to rectify the situation before receiving the unwanted reward in due course of time for polluting Iskcon and vedic culture as many other bogus "gurus" got. ARE YOU THREATENING ME? I AM SOOOO TIRED OF 'DEVOTEE' FANATICS THREATENING ME AND ATTACKING ME TO ACTUALIZE THEIR THREATS. WHAT UNWANTED REWARD ARE YOU WARNING ME ABOUT? ARE YOU PASSING A FATWA ON ME IN THIS LETTER? SHOULD YOUR FANATIC COHORTS SOMEWHERE COME AFTER ME NOW BECAUSE YOU HAVE ISSUED THIS SENTENCE? Your servant Vrajananda das , Iskcon Revival Movement IS THE ISKCON REVIVAL MOVEMENT A HAVEN FOR MENACING THREATENING THUGS AND GOONS WHO TRY TO INTIMIDATE, WHO SLANDER AND LIBEL AND ACTUALLY ATTACK OTHER VAISHNAVAS FOR SIMPLY HAVING DIFFERENT VIEWS OR REALIZATIONS? ISN'T THAT WHAT HAPPENED IN ISKCON, WITH THREATS AND ATTACKS AGAINST VARIOUS HARMLESS DEVOTEES? IS YOUR PUFFED-UP PREJUDICIAL NARROW-MINDED FANATICISM REPRESENTATIVE OF THE IRM? IF IT IS, THEN I AM SORRY FOR EVERYONE ASSOCIATED WITH YOUR ORGANIZATION. I ONLY WROTE IN HERE TO GIVE SOME SINCERE AND VALUABLE ADVISE TO DEVOTEES ALREADY INVOLVED IN OR INTERESTED IN 'BIBLICAL' STUDIES. FACTUALLY I AM AN EXPERT IN THIS AREA, AND HOW BIBLICAL TRADITION IS RELATED TO OTHER KRISHNA-CENTRIC FORMS OF MONOTHEISM IN BOTH THE EAST AND WEST. BUT AS SOON AS MY WORDS APPEARED HERE, I WAS AGAIN HAMMERED, AS I HAVE BEEN MANY TIMES BEFORE, BY FANATICALLY ANTI- JEWISH AND ANTI-CHRISTIAN DEVOTEES. AFTER 30 PLUS YEARS OF SUCH UNWARRANTED ABUSE, FROM PEOPLE LIKE YOU, I AM LEAVING YOUR OFFENSIVE ASSOCIATION. I WISH YOU ALL (MY ACCUSERS AND THREATENERS) THE BEST OF EVERYTHING, AND THE ECSTASY OF KRISHNA PREMA IN THIS VERY LIFE! PEACE AND DIVINE LOVE, BHAKTI ANANDA vediculture, YVES FRANCES <yves.frances@c...> wrote: > > > > Bhakti Ananda proclaimed : > > > > > HARE KRISHNA ! > > > > SRI SRI GURU AND GAURANGA KI JAYA ! > > > > DEAR VAISHNAVAS, > > > > PAMHO. > > > > HOW UNFORTUNATE THAT AFTER OVER 30 YEARS, NOT A SINGLE VAISHNAVA HAS > > TAKEN MY ADVISE SERIOUSLY ENOUGH TO ACTUALLY JUST LOOK UP THE ACTUAL > > SANSKRIT-GREEK COGNATES IN THE SEPTUAGINT, APOCRYPHA AND NEW > > TESTAMENT . INSTEAD YOU ALL JUST GO ON SPECULATING, AND IGNORING THE > > AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SHASTRAS. > > Vedic teachings are very clear about reincarnation . They're is no need > to follow your advice to understand this topic particularly when a > specific scripture is not perfectly authentic, if not revisited by > centuries of Council. > This judeo-centric conception of absolute truth is not exactly what > Srila Prabhupada or other great sages use to evoke for displaying > different features of karma , as birth and death. > > > > > > > PLEASE, AGAIN, I BEG YOU TO ACTUALLY CONSULT THESE GREEK JEWISH AND > > NEW TESTAMENT SCRIPTURES, WHERE AMONG COUNTLESS OTHER PROFOUNDLY > > IMPORTANT JEWISH AND CATHOLIC CONNECTIONS TO VAISHNAVISM, YOU WILL > > FIND "KRIMA" AND RELATED WORDS FOR GOD'S JUDGMENT, EITHER FAVORABLE > > OR UNFAVORABLE, USED OVER 200 TIMES. (SEE KRIMA [KARMA], KRINO > > [KARMA], KATAKRIMA, KATAKRISIS, KRISIS [CRISIS, TRIAL TEST], > > KRITERION [CRITERIA ALSO], KRITES AND KRITIKOS [CRITIC, CRITICAL, > > JUDGING, JUDGMENTAL] > > There is no doubt of existing few similarities between Vedas and jewish > historiography but mainly vaisnavas give not great credit to the last. > > > > > IN MANY OF THESE EXTREMELY IMPORTANT GREEK 'OLD TESTAMENT', APOCRYPHA > > AND NEW TESTAMENT VERSES, THE WORD "KARMA" COULD BE EXCHANGED > > FOR "KRIMA" / "KRINO" ETC. WITH NO CHANGE IN THE VERSE'S TRADITIONAL > > JEWISH OR CATHOLIC MEANING AT ALL. > > Correct, all languages derive from prakrti, included hebrew , greek and > many different mlecchas languages. This caractere is to transform words > and meanings for misappropriation . Similarly Srila Prabhupada' book > are regularly revisited and "enlarged" but " fortunately" much less > distributed than original copies. > > > > > > > > > PLEASE, I IMPLORE YOU TO SERIOUSLY TAKE UP THE STUDY OF THE GREEK > > JUDEO-CATHOLIC SHASTRAS OF MEDITERRANEAN RHODA-KOUROS (RADHA- KRISHNA) > > CENTRIC VAISHNAVISM. > > > What a strange call for an Iskcon leader! Why don't you implore to read > Bhagavad Gita and Srimad Bhagavatam and book distribution?. > > > IN THIS TRADITION, THE 'SECOND PERSON' OF THE > > GODHEAD IS INCARNATE AS THE SERAPHIC GREAT PHYSICIAN, IASAS > > AESCLEPIUS, WHICH IS ANANTA BALARAMA IN HIS "HIDDEN INCARNATION" AS > > THE DIVINE NAGA-PHYSICIAN CARAKA (NOT TO BE CONFUSED WITH THE LATE > > COURT PHYSICIAN OF THE SAME NAME.) > > Aesclepios (literally meaning: lame) was certainly involved with > subterranean Nagas but has absolutely nothing to do with Balaram. He was > kicked out from the celestial abode and falling to the earth, he has > been curred from his injuries by the titan Centaur Chiron, his master, > with bear marrow in a submarine cave and taught him a kind of asuric > medicine, using poison , ancestor of the modern medicine.( I better > personally take shelter in Ayurveda). Later, Chiron as been killed by > Zeus's vajra for being a big demon. Sandipani Muni is the spiritual > master of Balaram and Krsna. Do you still feel part of Chiron sampradaya? > The snake of the caduceus, emblem of western medicine, refer to the > Nagaasuras,the use of venom for healing and not to Ananta Sesa. > Remember, brahmanical culture had big problem with the snakes, 3000 > years BC and probably still has. > So you are speculating to the maximum extent of a polluted esoterism > rough approach never encouraged by Srila Prabhupada . > > > > > PLEASE STOP OUTSIDE SPECULATION AND THE STUDY OF LATE, CORRUPTED > > PROTESTANTISM, AND GO BACK TO THE EARLY HEBREW AND GREEK JEWISH AND > > CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES AND TRADITIONS. > > > > GODHEAD'S PEACE AND LOVE TO YOU ALL, > > > > BHAKTI ANANDA GOSWAMI > > Next time, will you teach us how vedas are deriving from Torah or > K'baal? You cannot be a representant of vedic culture with such > statements, Maharajah and your incomplete understanding of vedas as for > judeo-greek mythology you purposely mix with is not sufficient to > exhort people to follow your tri-decennial advice. > All your post is full of falsification. This is a sign of a confused > mind and I humbly urge you to rectify the situation before receiving the > unwanted reward in due course of time for polluting Iskcon and vedic > culture as many other bogus "gurus" got. > Your servant > Vrajananda das , Iskcon Revival Movement Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 Dear Dharmapada dasa You are talking nonsense. Wake up. >"Those instructions by Shrila Prabhupada were issued a long time ago in a certain >context. Were it not for this context, we would have no call to go studying the Bible. Your term "Long time ago" means you want to try and JUSTIFY it is no longer applicable NOW Why? because it suits YOUR mentality. Get real! Then you say "in a certain context". That's just a jugglary of words the context is JUST AS APPLICABLE NOW as it was THEN. You are talking---- RUBBISH! Srila Prabhupada did NOT encourage studying literatures that are not very sound and *transcendental*. Bible is NOT eternal and is contradictory. Therefore to encourage ANYONE to spend lifes valuable time on this INSTEAD of Srimad Bhagavatam is going against Srila Prabhupada wishes and this will be COUNTER PRODUCTIVE. Yasya aprasadan na gati kuto pi by displeasing the Guru (Srila Prabhupada) he does not attain transcendental platform. What a tragic waste of human life! Adi 17.169 The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu in His Youth The sastras of the yavanas, or meat-eaters, are not eternal scriptures. They have been fashioned recently, and sometimes they contradict one another. The scriptures of the yavanas are three: the Old Testament, the New Testament and the Koran. Their compilation has a history; they are not eternal like the Vedic knowledge. Therefore although they have their arguments and reasonings, they are not very sound and transcendental. As such, modern people advanced in science and philosophy deem these scriptures unacceptable. Adi 17.169 The Pastimes of Lord Caitanya Mahaprabhu in His Youth When the scriptures of the yavanas--namely, the Old Testament, New Testament and Koran--cannot properly answer inquisitive followers, naturally those advanced in scientific knowledge and philosophy lose faith in such scriptures. SB 5.6.16 P The Activities of Lord Rsabhadeva The teachings of Lord Rsabhadeva are for the people of all yugas--Satya-yuga, Treta-yuga, Dvapara-yuga and especially Kali-yuga. These instructions are so powerful that even in this age of Kali, one can attain perfection simply by explaining the instructions, following in the footsteps of the acaryas or listening to the instructions with great attention. If one does so, one can attain the platform of pure devotional service to Lord Vasudeva. The pastimes of the Supreme Personality of Godhead and His devotees are recorded in Srimad-Bhagavatam so that those who recite these pastimes and listen to them will become purified. Nityam bhagavata-sevaya. **As a matter of principle**, devotees should read, speak and hear Srimad-Bhagavatam persistently, *twenty-four hours daily if possible.* That is the recommendation of Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu. Kirtaniyah sada harih. >I encourage Bhakti Anand Goswami to offer us more explanations so >that we can better understand the world around us in its connecto to >our world Vedic culture. " NO! We disagree. Listen to Srila Prabhupada and stop doing nonsense. Best to hear INSTEAD the REAL nectar--- of Srimad Bhagavatam the TRANSCENDENTAL topics which "If one does so, one can attain the platform of *pure* devotional service to Lord Vasudeva." Lets refresh your memory: the quotes stand as they are and are EQUALLY APPLICABLE TODAY in their context. 70-04-28. Letter: Citsukhananda Regarding the disturbing groups of "Christians" so-called, that is alright. Let them follow Lord Jesus Christ. Regarding their dogmatic insistence, everyone thinks like that, so if one is not prepared to advance more, it is better to avoid them. If one is limited by some formulas only, he is described as an animal which is bound up by the chain of the master and cannot move beyond the length of the chain. So we are concerned with persons who are not chained by anything. Srila Prabhupada only preached to these kind of people on the basis of giving-up meat eating . So long as they are merciless they can NOT understand the value of Krsna Consciousness what is soul, what is God. 730824BG.LON LecturesPrabhupada: Pariksit Maharaja. He said that God consciousness, Krsna consciousness, cannot be understood by the animal killer. Vina pasughnat. Nivrtta-tarsair upagiyamanat. You'll find those who are animal killers, the so-called Christians and Mohammedans, they cannot understand. They (are) simply fanatics. Cannot understand what is soul, what is God. They have got some theories and they are thinking we are religionists. What is sin, what is pious activities, these things are not understood by them because they are animal killers. It is not possible. Therefore Lord Buddha propagated ahimsa. Ahimsa. Because he saw the whole human race is going to hell by this animal killing. "Let me stop them so that they may, in future, they may become sober." Sadaya-hrdaya darsita: Two sides. First of all he was very much compassionate, that poor animals, they are being killed. And another side, he saw "The whole human race is going to hell. So let me do something." Therefore he had to deny the existence of the soul because their brain will not tolerate such things. Therefore he did not say anything about the soul or God. He said that "You stop animal killing." If I pinch you, you feel pain. So why should you give pain to others? Never mind he has no soul; that's all right. He did not talk anything about soul. So these people say the animals have no soul. But that's all right, but he's feeling pain when you are killing the animal. So you also feel pain. So why should you give pain to others? That is Lord Buddha's theory. Sadaya-hrdaya darsita-pasu-ghatam. Nindasi yajna-vidher ahaha sruti-jatam. He denied that: "I don't accept Vedas." Because in the Vedas there is sometimes recommendation, not for killing, but for giving rejuvenation to an animal. But killing, in that sense, is there for sacrifice. But Lord Buddha did not accept even animal killing in sacrifice. Therefore, nindasi. Nindasi means he was criticizing. Nindasi yajna-vidher ahaha sruti-jatam sadaya-hrdaya darsita. Why? He was so kind and compassionate. That is Krsna consciousness. God is very kind, very compassionate. He does not like. But when there is necessity, He can kill. But His killing and our killing is different. He's all good. Anyone killed by Krsna, he immediately gets salvation. So these thing are there. ys mahesh Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted March 10, 2005 Report Share Posted March 10, 2005 > Can anyone pass some Bible verses on to me that suggest reincarnation? > > Dharmapad > > MY ADVISE WAS FOR DEVOTEES, WHO ARE ALREADY INQUIRING ABOUT OR > WRITING ABOUT THESE SUBJECTS, TO STOP SPECULATING ABOUT SUCH > TEACHINGS IN THE "BIBLE", AND TO GO DIRECTLY TO THE ANCIENT GREEK > SOURCES TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS ACTUALLY THERE. Bhakti Anand, Very nice advice. We have to understand these scriptures in the light of the Vedic version. THE SEPTUAGINT AND > APOCRYPHA ARE WIDELY AVAILABLE IN THE ANCIENT GREEK, AND IN RELIABLE > INTERLINEAR TRANSLATIONS IN OTHER LANGUAGES FOR ANYONE WHO IS NOT > ABLE TO READ ANCIENT GREEK. THESE GREEK JEWISH SCRIPTURES SHARE > COMMON DEITY TITLES, THEOPHORIC NAMES AND RELIGIOUS TERM USAGES > WITH 'NEW TESTAMENT' CATHOLIC (EARLY APOSTOLIC CHRISTIAN)GREEK. ALL > OF THESE GREEK JUDEO-CATHOLIC SCRIPTURES ARE STILL EXTANT IN > AUTHENTICALLY ANCIENT COPIES AND PARTIAL COPIES, WHICH HAVE BEEN > EXHAUSTIVELY STUDIED FROM VARIOUS PERSPECTIVES FOR CENTURIES. THUS > EXCELLENT CONCORDANCES AND LEXICONS ARE AVAILABLE FOR THE ANALYSIS OF > THESE AUTHENTIC JUDEO-CATHOLIC SOURCE WORKS. FURTHERMORE NUMEROUS > ETYMOLOGICAL STUDIES HAVE BEEN DONE REVEALING IMPORTANT GREEK AND > SANSKRIT SO-CALLED 'INDO-EUROPEAN COGNATES'. THE PROBLEM IS THAT > BEFORE MY OWN 'BIBLICAL' GREEK AND KRISHNA-CENTRIC SANSKRIT > COMPARISONS THAT FOCUSED ON THE RELATED TRADITIONS OF RHODA-KOUROS > CENTERED MONOTHEISM IN THE MEDITERRANEAN AND SRI SRI RADHA-KRISHNA > CENTERED MONOTHEISM IN THE EAST, NO OTHER VAISHNAVA SCHOLAR HAD > ANALYZED THE SPECIFICALLY VAISHNAVA RELATED NAMES AND TERMS IN THE > JUDEO-CATHOLIC GREEK SCRIPTURES. Very nice line of investigation. A preaching tool, for sure. Can you sum up your investigations? Dharmapad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.