'Democracy,'Free Trade Worldwide Via Vote Fraud

[Guest guest]

'Democracy' And Free Trade

Worldwide Via Vote Fraud

By Z

Portland Indymedia

11-26-4

 

So, why *should* anyone in the Ukraine believe in an exit poll

financed by Western interests favoring one pro-Western candidate?

 

Sec State Powell has announced that the United States does not

accept as legitimate the recent vote in the Ukraine,

citing "credible reports of fraud and abuse." Actually, the only

real suggestion of fraud comes from the exit poll clash with the

ballot results. Ukraine has a very transparent voting system,

watched carefully by many citizens every step of the way.

 

Those Rove-Cheney-Bush apologists who have touted the party line --

"exit polls are not accurate" are hypocritical when the subject

switches to foreign elections.

 

In the Ukraine, if anything was faked, it was the exit polls, not

the ballots or counts.

 

The Ukraine exit polls favored pro-Western opposition leader Viktor

Yushchenko and so did the Bush administration. Who paid for the exit

polls? According to the Los Angeles Times , the poll showing the

widest Yushchenko lead was "financed in part by the U.S. Embassy and

other Western diplomatic missions."

 

Huh? What would most Americans say about the legitimacy of an exit

poll in America financed by the Ukrainian embassy and other former

Soviet republics? Not hard to guess.

 

So, why should anyone in the Ukraine believe in an exit poll

financed by Western interests favoring one pro-Western candidate?

 

It gets worse: Reuters tells us that the organizations conducting

the most important exit polls were the Kiev International Institute

for Sociology and the Razumkov Center. (Another poll, financed by

the government, still gave Yushchenko a victory, albeit a much

narrower one.)

 

Who supports the Razumkov Center? According to their website , they

receive financing from various Ukrainian government institutions --

but also from the "Democracy Encouragement Foundation of the U.S.

Embassy," as well as the Rand corporation, Britain's International

Institute for Strategic Studies (!!!), an entity known as the

Brinkford company , and a number of other western sources of much-

needed hard currency. (The list also includes non-western foreign

associates, such as Iran.)

 

Look into funding for the Kiev International Institute for

Sociology, and I bet you will find funding from the usual suspects

who bascially created Sociology and have mestacised into almost

every area of same.

 

Follow the money. The money behind the Ukrainian exit polls traces

back to the usual suspects, who are not at all the disinterested

observers they pretend to be.

 

So, the Ukrainian exit polls get considered valid (actually very

doubtful), while the spin in the U.S. is to discredit the (probably

very valid) exit polls of the Nov. 2 Election. Cute.

 

Of course, George Schultz, his crew of Vulcans, and the Families

with the old walnut-panneled rooms know nothing at all about what's

going on here. And The CIA is being cleaned out to help assure we

won't learn anything through leaks.

 

Pravda, hardly unbaised ("Socialist! Socialist! Communist!", they

cry), nevertheless offers a few interesting observations:

 

"Where was this condemnation during the appalling electoral fraud

committed in the USA on November 2nd?"

 

"Mention of 'electoral fraud and abuse' from an American observer

was laughable, after the two fiascos in the USA which saw the most

flagrant examples of vote-rigging and electoral fixing in modern

history."

 

"When the Republican Party deploys electronic voting machines bought

from Republican Party fundraisers who promised before the election

to help the President to win, the OSCE observers describe it as

localised and insignificant incidents. However, when the incompent

stooge Yushchenko fails to win in the Ukraine, it is fraud."

 

"Viktor Yushchenko, the defeated centre-right candidate, is well

known to Ukrainian society because he was already Prime Minister for

two years between 1999 and 2001."

 

(Joseph Cannon did the heavy lifting here. Somtum wrote it his way.)

 

-------------

 

Formatted, with links and a picture at

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi...

 

add a comment on this article

author: z

So why *should* anyone in the Ukraine believe in an exit poll

financed by Western interests favoring one pro-Western candidate?

Sec State Powell has announced that the United States does not

accept as legitimate the recent vote in the Ukraine,

citing "credible reports of fraud and abuse." Actually, the only

real suggestion of fraud comes from the exit poll clash with the

ballot results. Ukraine has a very transparent voting system,

watched carefully by many citizens every step of the way.

 

Those Rove-Cheney-Bush apologists who have touted the party line --

"exit polls are not accurate" are hypocritical when the subject

switches to foreign elections.

 

In the Ukraine, if anything was faked, it was the exit polls, not

the ballots or counts.

 

The Ukraine exit polls favored pro-Western opposition leader Viktor

Yushchenko and so did the Bush administration. Who paid for the exit

polls? According to the Los Angeles Times , the poll showing the

widest Yushchenko lead was "financed in part by the U.S. Embassy and

other Western diplomatic missions."

 

Huh? What would most Americans say about the legitimacy of an exit

poll in America financed by the Ukrainian embassy and other former

Soviet republics? Not hard to guess.

 

So why should anyone in the Ukraine believe in an exit poll financed

by Western interests favoring one pro-Western candidate?

 

It gets worse: Reuters tells us that the organizations conducting

the most important exit polls were the Kiev International Institute

for Sociology and the Razumkov Center. (Another poll, financed by

the government, still gave Yushchenko a victory, albeit a much

narrower one.)

 

Who supports the Razumkov Center? According to their website , they

receive financing from various Ukrainian government institutions --

but also from the "Democracy Encouragement Foundation of the U.S.

Embassy," as well as the Rand corporation, Britain's International

Institute for Strategic Studies (!!!), an entity known as the

Brinkford company , and a number of other western sources of much-

needed hard currency. (The list also includes non-western foreign

associates, such as Iran.)

 

Look into funding for the Kiev International Institute for

Sociology, and I bet you will find funding from the usual suspects

who bascially created Sociology and have mestacised into almost

every area of same.

 

Follow the money. The money behind the Ukrainian exit polls traces

back to the usual suspects, who are not at all the disinterested

observers they pretend to be.

 

So the Ukrainian exit polls get considered valid (actually very

doubtful), while the spin in the U.S. is to discredit the (probably

very valid) exit polls of the Nov. 2 Election. Cute. Of course

George Schultz, his crew of Vulcans, and the Families with the old

walnut-panneled rooms know nothing at all about what's going on

here. And The CIA is being cleaned out to help assure we won't learn

anything through leaks.

 

Pravda , hardly unbaised ("Socialist! Socialist! Communist!", they

cry), nevertheless offers a few interesting observations:

 

"Where was this condemnation during the appalling electoral fraud

committed in the USA on November 2nd?"

 

"Mention of 'electoral fraud and abuse' from an American observer

was laughable, after the two fiascos in the USA which saw the most

flagrant examples of vote-rigging and electoral fixing in modern

history."

 

"When the Republican Party deploys electronic voting machines bought

from Republican Party fundraisers who promised before the election

to help the President to win, the OSCE observers describe it as

localised and insignificant incidents. However, when the incompent

stooge Yushchenko fails to win in the Ukraine, it is fraud."

 

"Viktor Yushchenko, the defeated centre-right candidate, is well

known to Ukrainian society because he was already Prime Minister for

two years between 1999 and 2001."

 

(Joseph Cannon did the heavy lifting here. Somtum wrote it his way.)

 

Formatted, with links and a picture at

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi...