Jump to content
IndiaDivine.org

Opposition to Calif Hindu Temple

Rate this topic


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

Wed Oct 6, 2004 5:56 pm

Fundamentalist Christians Oppose Construction of Hindu

Temple in California

http://www.newindpress.com/Newsitems.asp?

ID=IEL20041005043944&Title=NRIs&Topic=0

 

SILICON VALLEY

Wednesday October 6 2004

newindpress.com

 

A proposal to build a Hindu temple and a cultural centre, tipped as

the largest

in southern California, is causing much disconcert in the Chino

Hills area, a

media report said here on Tuesday.

 

The project ran into rough weather following protests from the local

residents,

after which the Chino Hills city council blocked it last month,

refusing to

allow the height of the temple's spires to exceed the city's limit.

 

Local Hindu leaders are now struggling to decide whether to fight

the decision

in court or to continue their four-year search for a home for

southern

California's growing Hindu population.

 

"Our issue was very clear. We would like it to be an asset to the

community,"

Govind Vaghashia, spokesman for the project proponent Bochasanwasi

Shree Akshar

Purushottam Swaminarayan Sanstha (BAPS), was quoted as saying by the

Los Angeles

Times on Tuesday.

 

Chino residents have protested vehemently against the temple, saying

it would

generate too much traffic, ruin the city's atmosphere and become an

unwanted

regional attraction.

 

Objections also surfaced from opponents who said the project would

turn Chino

Hills into a "third world city" and "a haven for terrorists."

 

"It's really not serving the community," said resident Diane

Mine. "We have no

objections to having a church on the allotted acreage at a

reasonable size, for

the Bridgewater community."

 

One petition to stop the project said, the temple would play a role

in "changing

the city's demographics forever."

 

The fight over the temple in Chino Hills is the latest in a series

of skirmishes

around the country in recent years over plans to build bigger houses

of worship,

land use experts said.

 

The battle over the 1,64,372-square-ft temple and cultural centre

dates back to

1989, when BAPS representatives made plans to build the structure on

a 15-acre

plot near the commercial centre of the city.

 

But city officials had plans to build a civic centre on the same

property. Under

a deal negotiated between the city administration and

representatives of the

project, BAPS let the council buy the land and city officials in

turn promised

to help find an alternative site in Chino Hills, the paper reported.

 

After seeing 20 locations in over four years, BAPS chose the 20-acre

property

east of the Chino Valley freeway.

 

As word spread about the project, locals began to flood city hall

with letters

and e-mails, most of them opposing the project.

 

Many said, it would clash with the city's atmosphere. Opponents also

voiced

concern about the potential traffic generated by the project.

 

But a report that included an analysis by a private consultant and a

study at a

similarly sized Hindu facility in another town concluded that the

project would

not create traffic problems.

 

"Anybody who keeps coming up with traffic as an issue is not

listening," Mayor

Gary G. Larson, the only member of the council to consistently vote

for the

project, said.

 

Some of the opponents were also worried that the temple would draw

Hindus to

live in the city.

 

"Unless you want the current demographics to look a bit like New

Delhi, don't do

this," said an e-mail dated August 9, 2003. Another letter suggested

Muslim

extremists might blend in among Hindu worshippers, making the temple

a "hiding

place for terrorists."

 

BAPS representatives have refused to reduce the height of the

spires, saying the

design was based on proportions dictated in Hindu scriptures, the

report said.

 

Vaghashia said local BAPS leaders will confer with religious leaders

in India to

decide what steps to take now.

 

Some project supporters believe the council was swayed by opponents,

who

threatened to recall or vote against council members who supported

it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...
  • 1 year later...

Join the conversation

You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...