Sonia Gandhi's Father a NAZI Soldier

[Guest guest]

Tue, 24 Aug 2004 10:49:27 -0700 (PDT)Kalyan Kidambi Do you

know your Sonia?akka2 , amma

Do You Know Your Sonia?By Dr. Subramanian SwamyAugust 15, 2004Patriotic Indians

should thank the President of India for having the courage by citing a legal

hitch to dissuade Ms. Sonia Gandhi from staking her claim to form the

government in May this year. She therefore did not as expected on May 17th

become the Prime Minister of 1 billion plus people of India. It can now be

saidthat the nation has been saved from a monumental, devastating, and

permanent injury to India's national interest and patriotic psyche of Indians.

And therefore every effort that can be made in a democracy should be made to

ensurethat Ms. Sonia Gandhi is permanently out of reckoning for any public

office. For those who instinctively understand that, this Note is to explain

the factual basis for this conclusion, and suggest what patriotic Indians can

do now .My opposition to Ms. Sonia Gandhi is not merely because she is

Italian---born.

In other democratic countries, including in Italy, such an issue [of

foreign-born aspiring to be head of government]would not even arise at

allbecause the issue has already been settled by law, that a person cannot hold

the highest public office unless he or she is native born.In India there is no

such law, but the President according to my knowledge, correctly acted on a

proviso to Section 5 of the Indian Citizenship Act[1955] which empowers the

Union Home Ministry to lay down conditions that apply to Indian citizenship

acquired by foreigners by registration, which conditionswould be based on the

principle of reciprocity, viz., in Ms Gandhi's case such of those conditions

that apply to Indians on becoming citizens of Italy would apply to her.The

President reportedly told her that if she insisted on being invited to form the

government, he would want first to clarify, on a reference to the Supreme Court,

whether in view of this proviso her appointment as PM

could be successfully challenged in the court. It is fair to assume that this

report ofthe President's decision, is correct since the President had before

him my petition dated May 15, 2004 making just that point--- that Ms. Gandhi's

citizenship is conditional, and in particular she cannot be the PM legally. The

President had also given me an appointment at 12.45 PM on May 17, 2004 toexplain

my submissions in person, which I did. I also told him that I would challenge

such a constitutional appointment in the Supreme Court just as I had in 2001

when the Tamil Nadu Governor illegally swore in Ms Jayalalitha as

ChiefMinister.In that case, the Supreme Court had after hearing me and many

other constitutional luminaries, upheld my contention that mere majority in the

House is insufficient for being sworn in to a constitutional office. There must

be no disqualification as well. Ms. Jayalalitha had therefore to step down

becauseshe was disqualified by a conviction

handed by a trial court in the TANSI corruption case filed by me as private

complaint [she subsequently was acquitted by the Madras High Court, and hence

became eligible the next year].I also cited to the President a 1962 Allahabad

High Court case, which held that this proviso in the Citizenship Act was

binding and lawful.The nation in the Sonia matter has thus got an unexpected

but temporary reprieve, a reprieve received not only because her citizenship of

India by registration is not equal to one by birth even by Indian law, but also

a reprieve more because of what national security risk was averted. To

comprehendthat risk, we must first understand who Sonia Gandhi really is and

what danger she, her family and her friends in Italy hold for India's national

security. Even for an Indian born citizen, we find it difficult to know a

person's true background, but for an Italian born it is extremely hard because

of the remoteaccess for most people to Italy in

language and familiarity. This note is about that danger that Sonia represents

to the nation, which the people need to know.IIMs. Sonia Gandhi's background as

is publicized by her and her Congress Party today, is based on three lies to

hide the ugly reality of her life.First, her real name is Antonia not Sonia.

The Italian Ambassador in New Delhi revealed this in a letter dated April 27,

1983 to the Union Home Ministry which letter has not been made public. Antonia

is Sonia's real name in her birthcertificate. Sonia is the name given to her

subsequently by her father, Stefano Maino [now deceased] following his return

from Russia where he had been a prisoner of war. Stefano had joined the Nazi

army as a volunteer. Sonia is a Russian not Italian name. While spending two

years in a Russian jail, Sonia'sfather had become quite pro-Soviet; especially

after the liberating US army in Italy had confiscated all fascists' properties

including

his.Second, she was not born in Orbassano as she claims in her bio data

submitted to Parliament on becoming MP, but in Luciana as stated in her birth

certificate. She perhaps would like to hide the place of her birth because of

her father's connection with the Nazis and Mussolini's Fascists, and her

family's continuingconnections with the Nazi-Fascists underground that is still

surviving since 1945 in Italy. Luciana is where Nazi-Fascist network is

headquartered, and is on the Italian-Swiss border. There can be no other

explanation for this otherwisemeaningless lie.Third, Sonia Gandhi has not

studied beyond High School. She has falsely claimed in her affidavit filed as a

contesting candidate before the Rae Bareli Returning Officer in the 2004 Lok

Sabha elections, that she qualified and got a diploma inEnglish from the

prestigious University of Cambridge, UK.The truth is that Ms. Gandhi has never

studied in any college anywhere.

She did go to a Catholic nun run seminary-school called Maria Ausiliatrice in

Giaveno [15 kms from adopted home town of Orbassabo]. Poverty those days forced

youngItalian girls to go to such missionaries and then in their teens go to UK

to get jobs as cleaning maids, waitresses and au pair. The Mainos were poor

those days.

Her father was a mason and mother a share cropper.Sonia thus went to the town of

Cambridge and first learnt some English in a teaching shop called Lennox School

[which has since 1970 been wound up]. That is all her "education" is---learnt

enough English language to get domestic help jobs. But in Indian society

education is highly valued. Thus, to fool the Indianpublic, Sonia Gandhi

willfully fibbed about her qualifications in Parliamentary records [which is a

Breach of Ethics Rules] and in a sworn affidavit [which is criminal offence

under IPC, severe enough to disqualify her from being MP]. In popular parlance,

this is called 420 or 10 "numberi" [not to be confused with 10 Janpath].These

three lies indicate that Ms. Sonia Gandhi has something to hide, or has a

hidden agenda for India. We need to find out more about her.IIIMs. Sonia Gandhi

upon learning enough English became a waitress in Varsity Restaurant in

Cambridge

town. She first met Rajiv when he came to the restaurant in 1965. Rajiv was a

student in the University, but could not cope with the academic rigour for

long. So he had to depart in 1966 for London where he wasbriefly in Imperial

College of Engineering as a student. Sonia too moved to London, and according

my information, got a job with an outfit run by Salman Thassir, a debonair

Pakistani based in Lahore, and who has a export-import company headquartered in

Dubai but who spends most of his time in London. Thisfits the profile of an ISI

functionary.Obviously, Sonia made enough money in this job to loan Rajiv funds

in London, who was obviously living beyond his allowances [indira herself

expressed anguish to me on this score in late 1965 when she invited me to a

private tea at the Guest House in Brandeis University]. Rajiv's letters to

Sanjay, who was alsoin London then, clearly indicate that he was in financial

debt to Sonia because he requested

Sanjay who obviously had more access to money, to pay off the debt.However,

Rajiv was not the only friend Sonia was seeing those days. Madhavrao Scindia

and a German by name Stiegler are worth mentioning as other good friends of

Sonia. Madhavrao's friendship continued even after Sonia's marriage to

Rajiv.Scindia in 1982 was involved in a traffic accident near IIT, Delhi main

gate while driving a car at 2 AM. Sonia was the only other passenger. Both were

badly injured. A student of IIT who was burning midnight oil was out for a cup

of coffee. He picked them up from the car, hailed an auto rickshaw and sent

aninjured Sonia to Mrs Indira Gandhi's house since she insisted in not going to

a hospital. Madhavrao had broken a leg and in too much pain to make any demand.

He was taken to hospital by the Delhi Police who had arrived a little after

Sonia had left the scene. In later years, Madhavrao had become

privatelycritical of Sonia, and told some

close friends about his apprehensions about Sonia. It is a pity that he died in

mysterious circumstances in an aircrash.The circumstance under which Rajiv

hastily married Sonia in a Church in Orbassano is controversial but that was

his personal matter that has no public significance. But what is of public

significance is that Indira Gandhi who was initially dead set against the

marriage for reasons known to her, relented tohold a registry marriage with

Hindu ceremonial trappings in New Delhi only after the pro-Soviet T.N. Kaul

prevailed upon her to accept the marriage in "the larger interest of cementing

Indo-Soviet Friendship". Kaul would not have intervened unless the Soviet Union

had asked him to.IVSuch has been the extensive patronage from the beginning

extended to Sonia Gandhi from the Soviets. When a Prime Minister of India's son

dates a girl in London, the KGB which valued Indo-Soviet relations, obviously

would investigate her and

find out that she was the daughter of Stefano, their old reliableItalian

contact. Thus, Sonia with Rajiv meant deeper access to the household of the

Indian Prime Minister. Hence cementing the Rajiv-Sonia relations was in the

Soviet national interest and they went to work on it. And they did through

their then existing moles in the Indira Gandhi camp.After her marriage to

Rajiv, the Soviet connection with the Mainos was fortified and nurtured by

generous financial help through commissions and kickbacks on every Indo¬Soviet

trade deal and defence purchases. According to the respectedSwiss magazine,

Schweitzer Illustrate [November 1991 issue], Rajiv Gandhi had about $ 2 billion

in numbered Swiss bank accounts¬which Sonia inherited upon his assassination.

Dr. Yevgenia Albats, Ph.D [Harvard], is a noted Russian scholarand journalist,

and was a member of the KGB Commission set up by President Yeltsin in August

1991. She was privy to the Soviet

intelligence files that documented these deals and KGB facilitation of the same.

In her book¬The State Within a State¬The KGB in Soviet Union, she even gives the

file numbers of such intelligence files, which can now be accessed by any Indian

government through a formal request to the Kremlin.The Russsian Government in

1992 was confronted by the Albats' disclosure; they confirmed it through their

official spokesperson to the press [which was published in Hindu in 1992],

defending such financial payments as necessary in"Soviet ideological

interest".When the Soviet Union disintegrated in 1991, things changed for Ms.

Sonia Gandhi. Her patrons evaporated. The rump that became Russia was in a

financial mess and disorder. So Ms. Sonia Gandhi became a supporter of another

communist country to the annoyance of the Russians.The national security

ramification of this 'annoyance' is now significant: The President of Russia

today is Putin, a former dyed-in-the-wool

KGB officer. Upon Dr. Manmohan Singh's government taking office, Russia called

back it's careerdiplomat Ambassador in New Delhi and immediately posted as the

new Ambassador a person who was the KGB station chief in New Delhi during the

1970s. In view of Dr. Albats confirmed revelation, it stands to reason that the

new Ambassadorwould have known first hand about Sonia's connections with the

KGB. He may have in fact been her "controller". The new Indian government which

is defacto Sonia's, cannot afford to annoy him or even disregard Russian demands

coming from him? They will obviously placate him so as not to risk exposure. Is

thisnot a major national security risk and a delicate matter for the nation?Of

course, all Indians would like good normal and healthy relations with Russia.

Who can forget their assistance to us in times of need? Today's Russia is the

residual legatee of that Soviet Union which helped India. But just because of

that, should we tolerate those

in our government set up having clandestine links with a foreign spy agency? In

the United States, the government did not tolerate an American spying for

Israel even though the two countries are as close as any two countries can be.

National security and friendship are asdifferent as chalk and cheese.In

December 2001, I had filed a Writ Petition in the Delhi High Court with the

photocopies of the KGB documents, and sought a CBI investigation, which the

Vajpayee Government was refusing. Earlier, Minister of State for CBI, Vasundara

Raje [now Rajasthan CM], on my letter dated March 3, 2001, had ordered the CBI

to investigate. But after Sonia Gandhi and her party stalled the proceedings of

Parliament on this issue, the then Prime Minister Vajpayee cancelled Vasundara's

direction to the CBI.The Delhi High Court issued a direction to the CBI to

ascertain from Russia the truth of my charges. The CBI procrastinated for three

years, and finally told the Court without an

FIR registered the Russians will not entertain any suchquery. But who stopped

the CBI from registering an FIR? The next hearing of the case is on September

8th.VAfter Sonia married Rajiv, she went about minting money with scant regard

for Indian laws and treasures. Within a few years the Mainos went from utter

poverty to billionaires. There was no area that was left out for the rip-off.

On November 19, 1974, as fresh entrant to Parliament, I asked the then Prime

Minister Ms. Indira Gandhi on the floor of the House if her

daughter-in-law,Sonia Gandhi was acting as an insurance agent of a public

sector insurance company [Oriental Fire & Insurance], giving the Prime

Minister's official residence as her business address, and using undue

influence to insure all the officers of the PMO while remaining an Italian

citizen [thus violating FERA]? There was uproar in Parliament, but Mrs. Indira

Gandhi had no alternative but to cut her losses. She made a rare

admission that it was so, and that it was by mistake, but that Sonia had

resigned from her insurance agent status [after my question]. But Sonia was

incorrigible. Her contempt for Indian law continued tomanifest.The Justice A.C.

Gupta Commission set up by the Janata Party government in 1977 came out with a

voluminous report on the Maruti Company then owned by the Gandhi family, and

has listed eight violations of FERA, Companies Act, and ForeignersRegistration

Act by Sonia Gandhi. She was never prosecuted, but can be still prosecuted

because under Indian law, economic crimes not subject to the statute of

limitation.In January 1980, Indira Gandhi returned as Prime Minister. The first

thing Sonia did was to enroll herself as a voter. This was a gross violation of

the law, enough to cause cancellation of her visa [since she was admittedly an

Italian citizen then]. There was some hullabaloo in the press about it, so

theDelhi Chief Electoral Officer got her

name deleted in 1982. But in January 1983, she again enrolled herself as a

voter! Such is her revealed disdain for Indian laws and that is her mindset

even today.VIThe bottom line observed in Sonia's mindset is that she can always

run back to Italy if she becomes vulnerable at anytime. In Peru, President

Fujimori who all along claimed to be "born Peruvian", faced with a corruption

charge fled toJapan with his loot and reclaimed his Japanese citizenship.In

1977, when the Janata Party defeated the Congress at the polls, and formed the

government, Sonia with her two children, abandoned Indira Gandhi and ran to the

Italian Embassy in New Delhi and hid there. Rajiv Gandhi was a government

servant then [as an Indian Airlines pilot], but he too tagged along and hid in

that foreign embassy ! Such was her baneful influence on him. Rajiv did snap

out Sonia's influence after 1989, but alas he was assassinated before he could

rectify it. Those close to Rajiv knew

that he was planning set things right about Sonia after the 1991 elections. She

did too know of it because he had toldher. Ever wonder why Sonia's closest

advisers are those whom Rajiv literally hated? Ambika Soni is one such name.

Ever wonder why she asked the President of India to set aside, on a mercy

petition, the Supreme Court judgment directing that Rajiv Gandhi's LTTE killers

be hanged to death, when she was not similarly moved for Satwant Singh who

killed Indira Gandhi or recently for Dhanajoy Chattopadhyaya? The explanation

for this special consideration for the LTTE lies in what Rajiv had told her in

1990.Those who have no love for India will not hesitate to plunder her

treasures. Mohammed Ghori, Nadir Shah, and the British scum in the East India

Company made no secret of it. But Sonia Gandhi has been more discreet, but as

greedy, in her looting of Indian treasures. When Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi

were PrimeMinisters, not a day passed when the PM's

security did not go to the New Delhi, or Chennai international airport to send

crates and crates unchecked by customs to Rome. Air India and Alitalia were the

carriers. Mr. Arjun Singh first as CM, later as Union Minister in charge of

Culture was her hatchet man. Indian templesculpture of gods and goddesses,

antiques, pichwai paintings, shatoosh shawls, coins, and you name it, were

transported to Italy to be first displayed in two shops owned by her sister

[i.e., Anuskha alias Alessandra]. These shops locatedin blue-collar areas of

Rivolta [shop name: Etnica] and Orbassano [shop name:Ganpati] did little

business because which blue collar Italian wants Indian antiques? The shops

were to make false bills, and thereafter these treasureswere taken to London

for auction by Sotheby's and Christies. Some of this ill-gotten money from

auction went into Rahul Gandhi's National Westminister Bank and Hongkong &

Shanghai Bank, London accounts, but most of it found it's way into

the Gandhi family account in the Bank of America in Cayman Islands.Rahul's

expenses and tuition fees for the one-year he was at Harvard, was paid from the

Cayman Island account. What kind of people are these Gandhi-Mainos that bite the

very hand of Bharat Mata that fed them and gave them a good life? How can the

nation trust such greedy thieves?Since I failed to persuade the Vajpayee

government to defend India's treasures from plunder by the Mainos, I approached

the Delhi High Court in a PIL. The first Bench of the court issued notice to the

Government, but since the Indian government dragged it's feet, the Court

directed the CBI to seek Interpol's and Italian government's help. The Italian

government justifiably asked for a Letter Rogatory for which a FIR is a

pre-requisite. But the Interpol did oblige and submitted two voluminous

reports, which the Court directed the CBI to hand over to me. But CBI has

refused, and has claimed privilege! The CBI has

also been caught lying in court by telling the judges that Alessandra Maino is a

name of a man, and Via Bellini 14, Orbassano is a name of a village [not the

streetaddress of the Maino's residence]. Although the CBI counsel had to

apologise to the court stating he made a mistake, he has been promoted to

Additional Solicitor General by the new government! The Vajpayee-Sonia mutual

assistance pact is in full view. The case now comes up on September 8th.But the

most sinister aspect of Sonia Gandhi's character is her connection with

terrorists. I am still working on it, but she has had long connection with the

Habash group of Palestinian, and has funded Palestinian families that lost

their kith and kin in a suicide bombing or hijacking episode. This, Rajiv

Gandhihimself told me and was confirmed to me [the funding] by Yassir Arafat

when I met him in Tunis on October 17, 1990 at the request of Rajiv Gandhi.

Rajiv Gandhi and I were good friends from 1978, but became very

close buddies after V.P. Singh had betrayed him in 1987. We met practically

every day, mostly in the early hours from 1AM to 4AM. It was at my suggestion

that he made Chandrashekhar the PM. And contrary to public impression, he was

not mainly responsible for the fall of Chandrashekar government in which I was

a Minister.Besides the Palestinian extremists, the Maino family have had

extensive business dealings with Saddam Hussein, and surprisingly with the LTTE

["the Tamil Tigers"] since 1984. Sonia's mother Paola Predebon Maino, and

businessmanOttavio Quattrocchi were the main contacts with the Tigers. The

mother used the LTTE for money laundering and Quattrocchi for selling weapons

to earn commissions. Sonia's conduit to the LTTE has been and is through Arjun

Singh who uses Bangalore as the nodal point for contact.There is a string of

circumstantial evidence pointing to the prima facie possibility that the Maino

family may have contracted the LTTE to kill

Rajiv Gandhi. The family may have assured the LTTE that nothing would happen to

thembecause they would ensure it is blamed on the Sikhs or the evidence so much

fudged that no court would convict them. But D.R. Karthikeyan of the CBI who led

the SIT investigation got the support of Narasimha Rao and cracked the case,

andgot the LTTE convicted in the trial court, and which conviction was upheld

in the Supreme Court.Although on the involvement of Congress Party in the

assassination, DRK soft peddled on a number of leads perhaps because he did not

want political controversy to put roadblocks on his investigation as a whole.

The Justice J. S.Verma Commission, which was set up as the last official act of

the Chandrashekhar government before demitting office on June 21, 1991, did find

that the Congress leaders had disrupted the security arrangements for the

Sriperumbudur meeting. The Commission wanted further probe into it but the

Raogovernment rejected

that demand. In the meantime under Sonia's pressure, the Jain Commission was set

up by the Rao government, which tried to muddy the waters and thus exonerate the

LTTE. But the trial court judgment convicting theLTTE came earlier, and that

sinister effort too failed.Nowadays, Sonia is quite unabashed in having

political alliance with those who praise Rajiv Gandhi's killers. No Indian

widow would ever do that. My investigations into Sonia's involvement in Rajiv's

assassination is therefore still on. I am also author of a best seller titled

Assassination Of Rajiv Gandhi¬Unasked Questions and Unanswered Queries

[published by Konark in 2000] in which I have given some indications.Is it not

significant that the political career of Sonia Gandhi advances concomitantly

with a series of assassinations and apparently accidental deaths? How did

Sanjay's plane nosedive to a crash and yet the fuselage not explode? There was

no fuel! Why was there no inquiry conducted?

Is it not a fact that Indira Gandhi died because of loss of blood from the

wounds and not directly due to a bullet impacting her head or heart? Then is it

not strange that Sonia had insisted that the bleeding Indira be driven to Lohia

Hospital -- in the opposite direction to AIIMS, which had a contingency

protocol set up for precisely suchan event? And after reaching Lohia Hospital,

did not Sonia change her mind and demand that they all drive to AIIMS thus

losing 24 valuable minutes.

The same kind of mystery surrounds the sudden deaths of Sonia's other political

roadblocks such as Rajesh Pilot, Jitendra Prasad, and Madhavrao Scindia. Such

things happened in the dark ages in Italy. Should we allow it India like dumb

cattle?What Can We Do?We have to ensure that the Maino clan does not stay in

power. Dr. Manmohan Singh may be PM, which is a small relief, but he is not a

fighter. The real power in government today is wielded by the Maino mafia gang.

Can they be dethroned?In Indian democracy, only a shocking scandal can unseat a

government other than by losing majority. Today's priority is not for toppling

the Congress government as such since Manmohan Singh is a decent and scholarly

person, but in driving the Maino clan out of India. It will however not be long

before Sonia will give Manmohan Singh marching orders, and he will march out

meekly. We should not expect him to resist.With Sonia's defacto government

in place, it is also unrealistic to expect that I can get an early victory in

the courts on the KGB and antique smuggling cases.

The most potent weapon therefore to dislodge the Maino clan [including Rahul and

Priyanka] is by exposing their Italian citizenship. In 1992, Sonia revived her

citizenship of Italy under Article 17 of the Italian Citizenship Law [Act 91

of1992]. Rahul and Priyanka were born Italian citizens because Sonia was

Italian when she gave birth to them [italian law based on jure sanguinis].

Hence, they continue be Italians since they never renounced it. Both have been

traveling abroad on Italian passports. They may now acquire Venezuela passports

sinceRahul's girl friend Veronica is a Venezuelan. That means one more foreign

bahu for us tolerant Indians. The Maino-Gandhis are certainly getting

globalized. So what can patriotic Indians do?There is an urgent need to

document these facts on notarized paper, for which we need a network in London,

Milan, Hongkong and Venezuela. Those persuaded by my above stated facts and

arguments may join in and help set up

this network.

Tired of spam?

Mail has the best spam protection around