LORD KRISHNA's DWARAKA CITY?

[Guest guest]

>"indologia2000" <indologia

>"Vrn Davan" <vaidika1008

>LORD KRISHNA's DWARAKA CITY?

>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 02:15:43 -0000

>

>Julio's past 14, in the program discovery territory from Discovery

>Channel, Mr. Graham Hancock show a documentary on the civilizations

>submerged pre diluviane in India. Being supported in several

>scholars, presented systematic arguments against the Arya Inviation

>theory, he showed the discoveries of the Gulf of Cambay 7500 BC, the

>discoveries of the river Sarasvati too, dating them in the 7000 BC.

>However, he rejected the ruins of Dwaraka, alleging to had have

>discovered a stone, similar anchor to those used by boats in the

>Middle Age. In this way, he ignored completely, all the discoveries

>and investigations carried out by the Dr. S. R. Rao and his team. At

>the same time, when I was asking on the status of the Mr. Graham in

>the idological list, I received the following notification:

>nevertheless, I wanted more informs on the so called stone of

>anchoring.

>

>: Stephen Hodge <s.hodge

> [ agregar a contactos l bloquear l agregar a lista

>spam l agregar a lista blanca ]

>

> Para: INDOLOGY

>

> Copia:

> Fecha: Jueves 15 de Julio de 2004 02:39 am

> Tema: Graham Hancock

>

>Horacio Francisco Arganis Juarez wrote:

>

> > Re: Snakes

>Sorry, but it helps if you change the subject line to indicate a new

>thread.

>

> > Pranam!!! I am looking for the e-amil addres from Prfr. Hambock (or

>some

>thing like that) Graham of England, may be Durbhan University.

>Becuase he

>edite, in territory discovery channel, a very innovative and

>procative video

>about pre flood "civilitations in India." Could your fine persons

>help me

>and discloset your comentairies on the issue.

>*****

>You are, of course, referring to Graham Hancock who is neither a

>professor

>(but is a former journalist) nor I hope employed by any university. I

>don't

>think he is available directly by email but there should be a website

>devoted to his many fantasies, though depending on your critical

>sensibilities, the man is either an innovative "researcher" or a

>deranged

>and somewhat arrogant crank. I tend towards the latter position. In

>fact,

>there is lots of information on the internet debunking his ridiculous

>theories which have drawn the deserved scorn of all serious scholars.

>Typical of his theories is his claim that the Antarctic was

>the "original"

>Atlantis, originally situated thousands of miles to the north in the

>middle

>of the Atlantic which then just happened to "slip" down to its

>current icy

>location no more than 10,000 years ago -- despite the evidence of ice-

>cores

>which prove that the Antarctic has been ice bound for several million

>years.

>Virtually all of his claims are demonstrably untrue or distortions of

>known

>facts. However, if you are interested in a plausible account of a

>possible

>location for pre-flood (c7000 BCE) civilization in SE Asia, try

>Stephen

>Oppenheimer's "Eden in the East".

>

>Best wishes,

>Stephen Hodge

>

>

 

_______________

Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee®

Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963