PLUTO was known to Vyas 5561 BC

[Guest guest]

PLUTO (was known to Vyas) in 5561 BCE

ARTICLE : Pluto Was Known to Vyas in 5561 BCE

jai (Dr. Jai Maharaj)

July 18, 1996

Message-Id: <4skjnn$a8u

Organization: Mantra Corporation, USA

Newsgroups: soc.religion.hindu

 

THE SCIENTIFIC DATING OF THE MAHABHARAT WAR

16th October 5,561 BCE

 

By Dr. Padmakar Vishnu Vartak

(Part-8)

Courtesy of Prasad Gokhale

PLUTO (was known to Vyas in 5561 BCE)

 

Krittikaam Peedayan Teekshnaihi Nakshatram......

[30-Bheeshma.3]

 

Vyas states that there was one Nakshatra, i.e, some

immobile liminary troubling Krittika (Pleides) with its

sharp rays. This "star" in Krittika must have been some

"planet". It must have been stationary for many years,

that is why Vyas called it Nakshatra which means a thing

that does not move according to Mahabharat itself [Na

Ksharati Iti Makshatram]

 

Hence the Nakshatra was a planet moving very slowly like

pluto which takes nine years to cross one Nakshatra of

13 degrees. My assumption that this Nakshatra was Pluto

gets confirmed by B.O.R.I (Bhandarkar Oriental Research

Institute?) Edition which states thus:

 

 

Krittikasu Grahasteevro Nakshatre Prathame Jvalan......

[26- Bhishma.3]

 

Some editions mention 'Grahasteekshnah'. Thus Teevra,

Teekshana and Nakshatra are the names of one and the

same planet (graha) which was in Krittlka in 5561 BCE

Let us see if Vyas has given these names to Pluto and if

Pluto was in Krittika. It is stated that Krittika was

troubled with sharp rays by that planet -- this

indicates that it was Nirayan Krittika.

 

Pluto was at 175 degrees in 1979. It takes 248 years

per rotation. 1979+5561=7540 years. 7540 divided by

248 gives 30.403223 turns. 0.403223 turn means 145

degrees. 175 - 145 = 30 degrees. This is the site of

Krittika. Thus it is proved beyond doubt that Vyas bas

mentioned the position of Pluto, which was discovered to

the modern world in 1930. Vyas could have used his

Yogic Vision or mathematical brain or a lens or some

other device to discover Teevra, Teekshna' or Nakshatra

or Pluto.

 

Thus all the three so-called 'New' planets are

discovered from Mahabharat. It is usually held that

before the discovery of Herschel in 1781 AD, only five

planets were known to the world. This belief is wrong

because Vyas has mentioned 'seven Great planets', three

times in Mahabharat.

 

Deepyamanascha Sampetuhu Divi Sapta

Mahagrahah....[2-Bhishma.17]

 

This stanza states that the seven great planets were

brilliant and shining; so Rahu and Ketu are out of

question. Rahu and Ketu are described as Graha' 23

meaning Nodal points. (Parus means a node). Evidently

Rahu and Ketu are not included in these seven great

planets. The Moon also is not included, because it was

not visible on that day of Amavasya with Solar Eclipse.

- From the positions discovered by me and given by Vyas it

is seen that Mars, Sun, Mercury, Jupiter, Uranus, Venus

and Neptune were the seven great planets accumulated in

a small field extending from Anuradha to Purva

Bhadrapada. So they appeared to Ved-Vyas as colliding

with each other, during total solar eclipse.

 

Nissaranto Vyadrushanta Suryaat Sapta

Mahagrahah....[4-Karna 37].

 

This stanza clearly states that these seven great

planets were 'seen' moving away from the Sun. As these

are 'seen', Rahu and Ketu are out of question. This is

the statement of sixteenth day of the War, naturally the

Moon has moved away from the Sun. Hence, Moon, Mars,

Mercury, Jupiter, Uranus, Venus and Neptune are the

seven great planets mentioned by Vyas.

 

Praja Samharane Rajan Somam Sapta grahah

Iva......[22-Drona 37].

 

Here again seven planets are mentioned, excluding the

Moon.

 

Even if we do not consider the planetary positions, from

the above three stanzas, it is clear that seven planets

are mentioned which do not include the Sun, Moon, Rahu

and Ketu. Naturally the conclusion is inevitable that

Vyas did know Uranus (Shveta) and Neptune (Shyama) as

planets.

 

If they were known from 5561 years BCE then why they got

forgotten? The answer is simple, that these two

planets, Uranus and Neptune were not useful in

predicting the future of a person. So they lost

importance and in the course of time they were totally

forgotten. But, in any case, Neelakantha from 17th

century knew these two planets very weIl. Neelakantha

is about a hundred years ancient than Herschel, and he

writes that Mahapata (Uranus) is a famous planet in the

Astronomical science of India. He also mentions the

planet 'Parigha' i.e. Neptune. 22 So both were known in

India, at least one Hundered years before Herschel. Vyas

is 7343 years ancient than Herschel, but still he knew

all the three planets Uranus, Neptune and Pluto.

..... to be continued.

 

Courtesy of Prasad Gokhale