Guest guest Posted March 8, 2004 Report Share Posted March 8, 2004 >BJP News <bjpnews >bjp-l (BJP Discussion Group) >vaidika1008 >[bJP News] Secular and secure >Sat, 6 Mar 2004 08:10:19 -0800 (PST) > >Secular and secure >By Harsh Vardhan >Hindustan Times >March 5, 2004 >http://www.hindustantimes.com/news/181_599367,00120001.htm > > >Arif Mohammad Khans formal entry into the BJP is a natural >homecoming of sorts. Since 1986, when he opposed the Rajiv Gandhi >governments cock-eyed brand of secularism as played out in its >handling of the Shah Bano case, Khan has been a symbol of protest >for the Muslim masses whose political expression has been quite >stunted by the mullah-secularist combine. > > >The historical coincidence of his entry into the BJP and the >passing of Sikander Bakht within 24 hours of each other cannot be >missed. Years back, Bakht, like Khan, had braved the contempt of >sections of the intelligentsia by becoming one of the founder >general secretaries of the BJP. He had anticipated the changing >mood in his community and encouraged a spirit of openness in >Hindu-Muslim relations which was not possible under Nehruvian >secularism. The Congress and the Left talked of engendering a >composite culture but actually ended up creating two composites. >One, a world of opportunities for the Hindus and the other, a hell >for the Muslims. As a result, the two communities lived in mutual >exclusion. > > >Large sections of the national media are uninformed of the true >history of the BJPs acceptability to Muslims. There is a tendency >to mindlessly parrot the pseudo-secularist line that the BJP >practises a policy of tokenism towards which-ever Muslim leader >walks into its fold. Men like Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi and Shahnawaz >Hussein are routinely depicted as traitors who were blinded by >ambition. They forget that Naqvi was elected to the Lok Sabha in >1998 and was a minister of state. Shahnawaz was sent to Parliament >by the predominantly Muslim electorate of Kishenganj in Bihar who >had no doubt that the BJP would work for their benefit. > > >In my own political career, I have detected a sense of deep >resentment in the average Muslim at being taken for granted as the >poor-educationally backward-religiously fundamentalist stereotype >with a predictable tendency to be swayed by pseudo-secularist poll >rhetoric. The reality is quite the opposite. In todays feel-good >economic climate, there is a discernible tendency in the young >Muslim to claim his legitimate share under the Indian sun. Khans >move to the BJP may be the first political expression of this >trend. > > >I recall the sense of surprise I felt when, back in the early >Nineties, while on a trip to Kerala, I learnt from a Muslim youth >operating a speedboat for tourists on Kovalam beach that he was a >regular visitor to an RSS shakha. Later, a fellow doctor from the >state branch of the Indian Medical Association told me there was >nothing unusual about it. He reported that in his own hometown, >Tirur in Mallapuram district (a Muslim majority has voted G.M. >Banatwalla of the Muslim League to Parliament uninterruptedly since >1977), it was common to see Muslim boys singing Vande Mataram in >RSS shakhas every morning. > > >Around 1995, the municipal elections in West Bengal threw up a >curious winner in the Muslim majority town of Haroa in North 24 >Parganas district. The BJP won hands down in a triangular contest >against the CPI(M) and the Congress. How was this possible? >Actually, the people, regardless of their religious belief, were >fed up with the politics of terror practised by the Marxists. >Today, the Trinamool Congress and the BJP win seats in large >pockets of Muslim population. The voters have had enough of being >taken for granted by the Marxists and the Congress. > > >The BJPs assessment of the present politico-economic conditions >makes its top leadership confident that the time has come to >reassure the Muslim masses that it is the only party that is >serious about mitigating the myriad problems experienced by the >community. Here I am not merely talking about the low percentage of >jobs in government held by Muslims or their insignificant >representation in elected bodies. Those statistics are old hat. As >a medical practitioner on the field, who has been attached to the >World Health Organisation, hardly a day passes when I am not >confronted with the fact that the problem of our Muslims go very >deep indeed. It is not just poverty but the social pressure brought >by archaic laws which keep them mentally and physically >undernourished. > > >Ignorance, often exacerbated by low literacy levels, results in >poor Muslims being marginalised by development programmes. When I >was monitoring the WHOs polio eradication programme in the >villages of western Uttar Pradesh, I often noticed a tendency on >the part of poor Muslims to shy away. The reason: somebody had >spread the rumour that the polio drops could result in their >children being sterilised for life! There is also considerable >resistance to family planning. Though the Shariat carries no real >injunction against Muslims having small families, all kinds of >propaganda circulates in rural hamlets and urban ghettos urging >Muslims to reject wiser counsel in favour of the two-child norm. In >fact, the incidence of anaemia and reproductive health problems is >proportionally higher among Muslim women than among their Hindu >sisters. > > >For Muslim women, the implications are scary. The community already >faces a high rate of maternal mortality and pre-natal deaths is >proportionally higher among Muslims than other social groups. >Official apathy is commonly mistaken as secular governance. Even as >clerics force poor Muslims to desist from sending children to >regular schools, the State looks the other way. This is the result >of commodifying the Muslim allowing the community to wallow in >poverty and backwardness for fear of provoking a fundamentalist >backlash. > > >But what about the vast majority of Muslims who would like to sink >their apparent socio-cultural uniqueness to secure better >livelihood for themselves and their children? Their voice was not >heeded. Now is the time to encourage Muslims to come out of their >isolationism. Help them to help themselves. > > >The Vajpayee government is serious about reaching the benefits of >feel-good to every segment of the population. The BJP is loyal to >Mahatma Gandhis vision of an India free of economic inequity. The >Mahatma had said that until the benefits of progress reach the last >Indian, we cannot perceive ourselves as a developed country. If >India is to achieve the status of a global economic power in the >21st century, we cant exclude the Muslims. The first term of the >Vajpayee government saw considerable new ground being broken in >reaching social and educational reforms to the Muslims. > > >The programmes on education, health and women and child development >have special focus on addressing the age-old problems of the >Muslims. The minorities finance corporations have been revivified. >No longer are they fiefdoms of the privileged members of the >community. The government is aware of the long road ahead. That is >why the BJP needs to break through the wall of misunderstanding >built by pseudo-secularists between the countrys only sincere >political party and the Muslims. Secularism, to the BJP, is no >empty slogan. Sarva Dharma Sambhav extends to providing a level >playing field to Muslims so that they can come out of the sidelines >and, by contributing their mite to national growth, experience true >pride as Indians. Hindus and Muslims have a common vision, a common >history and a common culture. > > >The writer is President, BJP Delhi Pradesh > _______________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar – get it now! http://clk.atdmt.com/AVE/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.