THE SOUL OF BHARAT IS FOR GRABS

[Guest guest]

--- Mohan Gupta <mgupta wrote:

> "Mohan Gupta" <mgupta

> "a4India\"" <info

> THE SOUL OF BHARAT IS FOR GRABS

> Wed, 10 Dec 2003 00:33:09 -0500

>

> THE SOUL OF BHARAT IS FOR GRABS

>

> Even after half a century of getting

> independence, there is no social, economic and

> political justice, equality of justice and

> opportunity to every individual in Bharat. There is

> also threat to the unity and integrity to the

> nation. The Congress and all pseudo-secular parties

> lack the expertise to halt the demise of Bharat

> nation. They all have more important issues on

> their agenda such as party solidarity, the firmness

> of their grip on power.

>

> Exercising political power without conforming to

> Dharma, which includes Rajdharma, is the sole cause

> of all the problems of India.

>

> Communist party is operating in Bharat much

> before the independence of Bharat, even then it has

> not become a national party, its influence is

> confined mainly in two states and in

>

> certain pockets of Bharat. After independence many

> political parties had been formed, except Jan Sangh

> or its later incarnation BJP, all other parties

> either have been wiped out or confined to some

> certain areas.

>

> BJP, even coming into existence after

> independence was the single largest party in 1996

> Lok Sabha elections. The emergence of BJP as the

> single largest party in Lok Sabha shocked every

> political formation in the country at that time.

>

> Question arises what factors or social forces

> brought about such a miracle in the political

> situation in 1996 election. The analysis of

> intelligentsia, western educated elite, political

> and social leaders, the so-called core group of

> think tanks reflects their total political

> bankruptcy.

>

> It is worthwhile noting that everyone

> enumerated every possible cause for defeat of ruling

> Congress party from rampant corruption to

> mis-governance, from high prices to social injustice

> which are the usual causes mentioned for a defeat of

> a political party.

>

> Congress party was able to survive as a ruling

> party up to half a century as people gave it a

> credit for winning independence of truncated Bharat

> from British and also it projected itself as the

> protector of poor and downtrodden and minorities

> especially Muslims.

>

> Marxist intellectuals basking under the benign

> benevolence of Nehruvian and Rajivian legacy, failed

> to realize the cultural ethos and social forces

> working in the country. The Marxist comrades once

> sold their souls to the hated British. The CPM has

> always been anti-national party. Obsessed by their

> traditional thinking of the Stalin era, they

> remained alienated from the history, philosophy and

> the cultural traditions of the multi-religious and

> multi ethnic character of India, which is the

> ever-present driving force of Bharatiya society.

>

> All the political parties of Bharat swear by

> secularism, which is in fact pseudo-secularism.

> Congress spokesman Shri V.N.Gadgil once said, "The

> time has come to re-examine the congress concept of

> secularism. An impression has gone deep in the

> minds of Hindus that congress pampers Muslims."

> Congress brand of secularism was in reality an

> inverted image of secularism, installed in the

> Bharatiya minds, an illusion which could never

> become a reality, both in theory and practice.

>

> All the political parties fail to understand

> that the secular outlook is an intrinsic part of the

> cultural and philosophical tradition and history of

> the Bharatiya subcontinent. The secular outlook is

> firmly rooted in the minds of Bharatiya people,

> irrespective of their religion and language from the

> hoary past when no record of any religion exists in

> the world except the Santana Dharma in Bharat.

>

> The exposure of the perverted concept of

> secularism as practiced in Bharat moved the masses,

> cutting across all barriers of religion and caste,

> language, territories and made the educated and

> illiterate to vote for BJP. In 1996 Lok Sabha

> elections, BJP crossed the hump by out beating the

> congress and all other parties and becoming the

> largest party in Bharatiya parliament. All the

> opinion polls by various agencies after the 1996 Lok

> Sabha elections pointed out that the popularity of

> BJP is fast increasing all over Bharat after

> successfully crossing the hump.

>

> All political parties except BJP appear to be

> incapable of understanding the political and

> cultural ethos of Indian people. Such inability can

> cause a position that will inevitably lead them on

> the path of more religious and ethnic divide, to

> conditions of social anarchy and political chaos,

> threatening the integrity and sovereignty of the

> country.

>

> The previous Lok Sabha elections have proved

> that the people of this country endorse or want

> Hindutva. People want the rein of power into the

> hands of those committed to protect the ancient

> culture and human values of this nation. To win the

> election in Bharat in future, any political party

> have to have a through knowledge of Hindu

> scriptures, culture and tradition, where the soul of

> India lies. Except BJP, no anti-communal warrior

> has such knowledge.

>

> Many people are wondering what difference would

> it really make for Hindus and Hinduism, if BJP comes

> to power. What kind of impact it will make on

> Hindus, Hindu institutions, and the Hindu religion

> and inter religious relations within Bharat.

>

> When BJP won the elections in Gujarat, then the

> pundits had dismissed Mr. Narendra Modi's landslide

> victory in Gujarat as one "crafted on corpses" and,

> thus, a flash in the pan. They said the BJP could

> never win without stoking the baser emotions of the

> people; that Ms Uma Bharti was a maverick who

> couldn't be taken seriously; that Ms Vasundhara Raje

> was an "arrogant princess" out of touch with the

> people's aspirations.

>

> BJP has won the provincial elections in Rajasthan,

> Madhya Pradesh and Chattisgarh conducted in December

> 2003. This is the first election considered to be

> quality of life election. In this election, BJP

> avoided Hindutva as an election issue, instead chose

> to focus on development and governance. Ram Madhav,

> a spokesman of Rastriya Swayamsevak Sangh said it

> was wrong to dismiss Hindutva as a force in any

> election. Delhi is the only territory where BJP lost

> election in this provincial election. Narendra Modi

> wanted to campaign in Delhi on behalf of BJP, but

> was not given a chance; otherwise picture would have

> been slightly different in Delhi election as well.

>

> The pundits, especially in the English language

> media, are now on the run because they, even more

> than 10 Janpath, are out of touch with voters'

> perceptions.

>

> The BJP's spectacular victories in the three Hindi

> heartland states, in fact, mark the hijacking of a

> traditional Congress plank and exposing it as

> hollow. All these years, the Congress projected

> itself as the party of stability and development,

> contending that the country's growth was entirely

> the result of the vision and determination of the

> Nehru-Gandhi dynasty. In fact the policies of so

> called Mahatma Gandhi and anti-Hindu Nehru and phony

> Gandhis have put progress of Bharat backward by at

> least a century.

>

> Nehru - Gandhi has made a sort of monopoly in

> running Bharat country, as if Bharat is a pocket

> borough of Nehru Gandhi family and if this family

> has all the knowledge of the world for running the

> country forever. Italian born Sonia has no knowledge

> of Bharatiya religion, culture, traditions, and

> languages; even then she expects to become Prime

> Minister of Hindu Bharat, while she herself is a

> Christian. Sonia is trying to spread Christianity in

> Bharat by many dubious means. She took her Bharatiya

> citizen after staying many years in Bharat, this

> fact shows how much attachment she has got for

> Bharat. This fact also shows that Sonia has her

> loyalties more for Italy and Christianity.

>

> Congress party members, workers and the people who

> support and vote for congress party, if not outright

> traitors of Bharat, then at least such categories of

> people are not very enlightened people.

>

> By and large, people who believed in Congress party

> and Nehru- Gandhi family, mesmerized as they were by

> the sight of large dams, huge public sector

> factories and other such symbols of

> industrialization. They voted against the Congress

> only when it hurt their sentiments. Thus, the party

> was removed from power at the Center in 1977 in an

> emotional outburst against the Emergency and in 1989

> because of the disillusionment with corruption in

> high places.

>

> The BJP's fortunes soared since 1991 not because

> people expected better governance from it, but on

> the account of the emotional appeal of the Ram

> Mandir Movement.

>

> The party's Hindutva plank still holds considerable

> sentimental and adhesive appeal. But its stunning

> victory in the Assembly polls this time shows people

> now also expect good governance from the BJP; the

> party has won its spurs by focusing upon development

> issues during its five-plus years in power at the

> Center.

>

> There was nothing emotional to help the BJP this

> time, neither Mandir nor Kargil. In fact, so-called

> pundits were ready with obituaries saying it was no

> longer a "party with a difference".

>

> With the increase of credibility of BJP amongst the

> masses, a Hindu awareness has strengthened which

> cuts across party affiliations. Many Bharatiya

> people are looking for a change. Everyone feels the

> need for upliftment of Hindu ideals and values. A

> pro- Hindu government would boost the morale of

> Hindu organisations and their activists.

>

> For many years, Hinduism has suffered and

> Hindus have no voice in the country. Islamisation

> and christianisation of Bharat is in full swing.

> Hindus need such organizations which can regulate,

> control, guide and protect their heritage. The

> GOVERNMENT OF Bharat and Gandhi -Nehru had already

> sold Hindus to secularism, so the aim of Hindus must

> be to make Bharat a Hindu Rashtra but in the mean

> time Hindus must establish such organizations to

> safeguard their interests. Any organisation must

> give priority to the following points

> 1. Population control by ONE COUPLE ONE CHILD. 2.

> One civil code. 3.Abolish special status of J.AND K.

> 4 Abolishing subsidy for Hajj and stopping

> appeasement of Muslims and Christians on name of

> minority. 5. Severe all links with Pakistan/

> Bangladesh and expel all illegal immigrants

> including 20 Million Bangladeshis. 6.control

> corruption. 7. Replace English in Bharat by Sanskrit

> and other Bharatiya languages.

> If we fail to implement the above plans

> then our all-economic gain will come to zero. Just

> talking and writing to each other is not enough but

> IT IS GOOD THAT HINDUS HAVE STARTED TALKING.

>

> Many people expect, a BJP government can now revive

> the lost glory of Hindu religion and give Hindus a

> chance to hold their heads high. Swami Vivekananda

> and Sri Aurobindo had taught us that the center of

> Hinduism is spirituality and Hinduism would rise

> through Sanatana Dharma.

>

> Any government, which understands the soul of

> India, would help in the sublimation of the

> inferiority complex among the Hindus and teach them

> to assert themselves. Hindutva is a wide and all

> encompassing term, which includes age-old Vedic

> Dharma, Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism and many other

> minor sects. Hinduism has always been and would

> always be secular and tolerant toward other

> religions, if they survive in future.

>

> By the time of next general election in 2004 of

> Bharat, whatever is left of Congress party, may

> either disintegrate or may be wiped out as a major

> political force. Only the parties, which understand

> the soul of India would survive as a major

> political, force in future elections. Congress has

> already got many times over the reward by projecting

> itself as the party, which won freedom for truncated

> Bharat.

>

> The soul of Bharat is for grabs in the next

> general election of Bharat which could be sometime

> in early 2004.

>

> Hindus need an organization, which can run all are

> temples at national level.

>

> Hindu Monks Form New Organization at Chennai Meeting

> for Hindu Causes:

> http://www.hindunet.com/News/default.php?

>

dtstr=20031202&Formsearchresults_Page=7#searchresults

>

> CHENNAI, INDIA, December 2, 2003: The Hindu Dharma

> Acharya Sabha, an apex body comprising all Acharyas

> and Mandaleswars (both leaders within Hindu

> monastic orders), was formed here with the objective

> of having a coordinated effort on issues concerning

> Hindus. The convener

> of the Acharya Sabha, Swami Dayananda Saraswathi,

> talking to newsmen here today, said the monastery

> leaders were for a uniform civil code. The

> Constitution, he said, provided for a Uniform Civil

> Code but it was yet to be enacted. Similarly, the

> Sabha wanted the Center to ban slaughter of cows as

> the animal was a symbol of worship for Hindus.

> Demanding that the States hand over the temple

> administration to autonomous bodies, he said that at

> present there was government interference in the

> administration of temples and donations to temples

> were utilized for other purposes. Temple funds

> should be utilized only for Hindu religious

> purposes, he said. The meet congratulated Tamil Nadu

> for enacting a legislation to ban conversion and

> urged the Center and the States to follow suit.

>

>

> Make Sanskrit and Hindi Visible or Narak is

> available

 

> ================

>

>

 

 

 

 

New Photos - easier uploading and sharing.