Jesus was a fact!!!

[Guest guest]

Sect and Disinformation

.. The history of the Religion is reconstructed of the phenomenon of

the sects. The better known examples are given in the Christendom.

Jewish authors as Filo of Alexandria who enumerated the Jewish sects;

and Joust of Tiberiades, contemporary of Jesus, he doesn't mention

anything to the Christ, neither their followers; because so much the

Jewish government as Roman, they pursued to death to all the related

with the new sect. However, some specialists as the Dr. Kergsten have

given through analysis, bases for a connection, of Jesus and John the

Baptist with the sect Sceniam of Qumram. Other scholars sustain that

references of Jesus exist in the rolls of the Dead Sea, calling

him "Teacher of Justice, orthodox Teacher". Although the researcher

Gringoire, by means of deep comparative analysis, weakens such a

connection; but it is good to point out that in their translation of

the Rolls, cap. XXIII, of the supposed codexes, Edmind S. Bordeux

discovered white references of Jesus instructing his pupils.

Another believing chronicer of the Judaism, Flabio Josephus (c. 37-

100?? A. D.) in one of their works, attributed to him, that which has

been questioned his authorhood, said: "It existed a men called saint

Jesus. Pilatus condemned him. From then on there is the present time

the sect of the Christian it exists". But the specialists consider

that such a mention is interpolated, being based in that such

evidence it was not mentioned by none of the Christian apologists .

Even Origens, openly declares that Josephus doesn't believe in

Christ. Without a doubt, the it has existed the counter argument,

that the apologist never had the necessity to lean on in the Jewish

history, but in the classic philosophy for their defense. Because

which it was appreciated in the Roman Empire. It is also correct that

Origins affirm that Josephus, like Jews fundamentalist, didn't

believe that Jesus was the Christ (Messiah).

The Latin historians wrote in a derogatory way against the

Christendom. Tacit (c. 65.155 A. D.) he mentions in their annals

(15.44) to Christ crucified by Poncius Pilatus. Suetonius (c. 65-155

A.D.): "In Rome the Jews caused continuous interferences for command

of Christ". He also mentioned more the Sect of the Christian in two

references. Celsus (II A. D.), he defines Jesus like magician or

bewitching, etc. This gave origin to the Apologists, among those that

who has more than enough room, was Origins whose father has personal

contact with Paulo of Tarso and other associated of Jesus, that they

met Him in person, and the Origen ´s father died martyred. Origins

wrote around 6000 works, like COUNTER CELSUS. Where he refutes the

hipercriticism from the Roman bigoters philosophers against the

Christianity.

Tertulianus (c. 160-220 A. D.) he wrote a great number of works the

other religions considering them heresies. Justin also stood out who

attacked to Orfeus and his doctrine. It is interesting that the Roman

Marcelinus had written on this internal phenomenon of the faithful

ones: "Neither the beasts in their thirst of blood can be enraged so

much among them as the Christian to their coreligionists". Clement of

Alexandria notified the violent disputes among the faithful ones, and

Celsus he affirmed that they were divided in many factions, because

each individual wanted to have his own party.

In the 187 D. C. Irineus it pointed out twenty varieties of the

Christianity and for the 384 A. D. , Epiphany counted eighty sects.

Irineus defended the right of Salvation: "Jesus Christ came to save

to all those that are born again for God for his means, infants,

children, adolescents and old". The author of the book DEDIKE, 90-

100 A. D. he affirmed the same thing. For that that before so much

divisionism, Irineus is able to canonize the Four Gospels been worth

up to now. All the other canons was considered apocryphal. They

receive this name a considerable quantity from writings non

recognized by the Church. Gospels are enumerated (biographies of

Jesus) that some erudites point out that there are seventy; Epistles,

Facts of the Apostles and Apocalypse... In the century III A. D., the

philosopher Porphirius He was opposed: "Is the Christian faith based

on what Jesus published, or in the ideas that his pupils forged in

the generations that continued to his death? Also, emperor Juliano

questioned that Jesus doesn't called to Himself God but rather their

followers who assigned him the title were. In 1570 D. C. Mohame

criticizes the Christian, pointing out that Jesus is a prophet;

although he doesn't deny His immaculate conception from the virgin

Mary". (Vid.. Das, Hare Krishna. Sect and Disinformation in Occult

Vision. Not 9. Nov. 97).

Concerning to the arguments of Mr. Hayyim ben Yehoshua, is important

to notice that without doubt his work demands immense brilliants

ideas; the rigor of his approach converts everything on evidences

historical as invalidate. Because under such approach, you can reject

the historicity of Buda, Krishna, Socrates, Plato and all historical

figures (Abraham, Moses, Prabhupada). Therefore, the objective

specialists don't accept such approach, those are classified inside

f the hipercriticism. Any Jews She/he can to see that, with their

hate reagent toward an aggression from the part of the Christian

fundamentalists, they are falling in a recalcitrant fundamentalism,

worse than the previous one. Therefore, their arguments are not very

impressive. Because with those same ones the atheists attack the

whole Religions. In other words, alone they are good to feed to the

atheisticism.

 

Hare Krishna das

Priest of Radha Govinda Mandir

And Graduate Student of U A de C.