SEEDS

[Guest guest]

The subject of the post is the recent discovery of what is the root

of destruction and uncooperation in the movement that is making

devotees arguing about the Vani, Vani vs. Vani, this cannot be as the

Vani is one. It is offensive then is it not to have Vani vs. Vani.

Now this is Krishna Consciousness Srila Prabhupada Vani so we have to

very sensitive do we not?

 

Just because of Vani vs. Vani so many formal and informal divisions

amongst the devotees have been formed and are forming. There is the

division in Commissioners of GBC, IRM, PADA etc deemed formal. Then

in the talking and surfing there are informal divisons.

 

WHY IS THIS?

 

There is PURITY(P) but it is mixed with IMPURITY(I) and when it is

proven that it is IMPURITY(I) it is falsely acknowledged as PURITY(P)

because of IMPURITY(I), P+I=I=P=I or "Piipi".

 

The answer is P-I=P or "Pip".

 

So the Vani is Pip, however due to the divisions mentioned earlier

the Vani is falsely seen to be Piipi, this is offensive. The

arguments and divisions will always be there unless Pippi is rejected

for Pip.

 

For example there is a devotee saying that pure devotees are not

within the jurisdiction of the Srila Prabhupada's Vani. In other

words, the Vani is not Pip but Piipi. This devotee is therefor

saying that the Vani is imperfect and impure. To say this is it not

being offensive? Then there is another devotee instead of being

happy with the Vani is requesting for another different Vani, is this

not offensive?

 

Pip not Piipi is required.

 

knowledgemanagement108