Sacrifice - Majority of People

[Guest guest]

By sacrifice we are unhappy and the Lord is happy. Is it not the sadism of the

Lord?

 

The real love requires the unhappiness by sacrifice. In such sacrifice one feels

happy since he sacrificed to the Lord. You take the mother. She gives the food

to her child and suffers with hunger. But she feels very happy in that

suffering. A human being cannot give back any thing for such real love. Even if

he gives something i.e., temporary only. But when the real love is proved by the

sacrifice the Lord gives the permanent fruit i.e., Brahma Loka. Sakthuprashta

gave his food to the Lord in human form though he was not having food for the

past ten days. If the guest was an ordinary human being, the guest must have

been a sadist, because he never cared about the hunger of Sakthuprastha.

 

 

 

But since the guest was the Lord, Sakthuprastha was given infinite wealth in

this world and also the permanent Brahma Loka after death. Therefore you must be

very careful in fixing the human form of the Lord. Otherwise if the human form

is an ordinary human being you are deceived and such a human being is definitely

a sadist. The unhappiness in sacrifice and the happiness that neutralizes

unhappiness are the characteristics of the path of the sacrifice. The Lord does

not insist such path.

 

 

 

The path should come from the depth of your heart with full willingness. If you

fear for the unhappiness you can never follow that path. When the case comes to

your children, you will not put this question because you have real love to

them. Are you not sacrificing your food to your child even though you suffer

with hunger and feel happy? Since you are not having the real love on the Lord

this question is coming to your mind.

 

The majority of the people will oppose the spiritual path preached by you. Only

one in thousands can accept your path. Should you not be universal and preach

the path acceptable to all the people?

 

 

In spiritual path, majority always goes to hell. Gita says that one in thousands

can only reach the God. Even that one person will reach the Lord after several

births (Kaschit Maam Vetti, Bahunaam Janmanaam). Jesus also says that the path

leading the hell is very wide with full of rush. The path leading to the Lord is

very narrow and only one or two persons will be travelling. The path to the hell

is filled with flowers and the path to the Lord is filled with thorns. Therefore

the path to the Lord is not acceptable to all. Then shall I recommend the path

filled with flowers to all the people, which is easily acceptable to all of

them?

 

 

I am universal because I am preaching the narrow thorny path to all the people.

But the path is not universal. I cannot help for that. In the spiritual path

only minority exists. There is only one in millions like Sankara, Ramanuja,

Madhva, Jesus, Sai, Vivekananda etc., in the spiritual path. The gravel stones

are in majority. There is only one Kohinoor diamond, which is valuable. The

fraud Gurus shows that flowery path which is “Amrutha Visham” i.e., it looks

like nectar but it is actually the poison. The Satguru shows the thorny path,

which is “Visha Amrutham” i.e., it looks like poison but it is actually the

nectar. Gita says the same (Yat Tat Agre Vishamiva).

 

at the lotus feet of shri datta swami

surya

 

 

 

SURYA

surya

www.universal-spirituality.org

 

 

 

for Good

Click here to donate to the Hurricane Katrina relief effort.