Guest guest Posted December 9, 2005 Report Share Posted December 9, 2005 Deciphering Indus Script as Sarasvati hieroglyphs with underlying language: Mleccha (Meluhha), a Prakrit A book has just been published (2005) containing the Proceedings of the Seminar in 2003 organized by the Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla. This contains the following essay: S. Kalyanaraman, 2005, Sarasvati hieroglyphs and bharatiya cultural continuum: mlecchita vikalpa and bharatiya sabhyata, in: Kapil Kapoor and Avadhesh Kumar Singh, eds., Indian Knowledge Systems, New Delhi, Indian Institute of Advanced Study Simla and DK Printworld (P) Ltd., New Delhi, pp.565-672 Excerpt from the Prefatory note (p.7): "Dr. S. Kalyanaraman in his exhaustive essay 'Sarasvati hieroglyphs and bharatiya cultural continuum: mlecchita vikalpa and bharatiya sabhyata' brings together epigraphy, archaeology, numismatics, history, satellite photography and contemporary observations to knit the story of Sarasvati river civilization. A deep scholarly statement, it is appropriately annotated and illustrated and is a conclusive argument for the existence of the Sarasvati river and its influence on the civilization and on Indian life. The methodology of presentation is a little unusual but is demanded by the intricate subject matter." A word document which mirrors this essay, file called "sarasvatihieroglyphs.doc" (13.9 MB) has been uploaded at the following URL; the link can be shared with more people: http://www.megaupload.com/?d=UP5IUCOE The following message was included: Sarasvati hieroglyphs: smithy repertoire read rebus as mleccha pan-bharatiya Prakrit. Mlecchita vikalpa is a term used by Vatsyayana. Bharatiyo in Gujarati means 'caster of metals'. Mlecchamukha in Samskritam means 'copper'; cognate milakkhu in Pali means 'copper'. The occurrence of epigraphs on copper plates and also epigraphs inscribed on metal tools/weapons are conclusive proof of the epigraphs being products of smithy. The rosetta stone is provided by two tin ingots with Sarasvati hieroglyphs discovered in a shipwreck at Haifa. Further evidences have been provided at http://spaces.msn.com/members/sarasvati97 (together with albums of illustrations); also mirrored at: http://sarasvatismithy.blogspot.com/ http://protovedic.blogspot.com/ provides an overview of the linguistic area of the civilization and a method to delineate the differentiation and evolution of proto-vedic into mleccha/prakrits, samskritam, avestan. It cannot be mere coincidence that almost all the so-called 'pictorial motifs' and the so-called 'signs' – both constituting glyphs – simply relate to just one techno-trade category of 4 th to 2nd millennium BCE: smithy. Not unlike the Egyptian hieroglyphs, a rebus method was employed to convey, through epigraphs, messages related to smithy property resources – resources such as furnaces of various types, minerals, metals, alloys. The underlying language was Mleccha (Meluhha), exemplified by the language integrate: Nahali > Nagari. The cracking of the code of Sarasvati hieroglyphs (so-called Indus Script) should provide for a framework to re-visit the evolution of bharatiya languages in a linguistic area, meanings of 'devices' on punch-marked coins, coins of the janapadas and later-day practices (such as evidenced by Sohaugara copper plate) to use copper plates for recording economic/property transactions. Leads are provided to explain the components of Kubera's navanidhi (nine treasures) and to explain the sculptural representations of ligatures such as makara, s'rivatsa or ujjain glyphs as metaphors of wealth. S. Kalyanaraman 8 December 2005 http://www.hindunet.org/saraswati Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.