Guest guest Posted December 18, 2004 Report Share Posted December 18, 2004 The verse, which I had heard from one of my teachers, is not in the Manu-sm.rti or any of the well-known Sm.rtis as far as I could check a few years ago. I needed to refer to it in the following article: year 2000. "The prologue and epilogue verses of Vacaspati-misra-I." Rivista degli Studi Orientali 73: 105-130. The point I was making was that the philosopher Trilocana was very probably Vaacaspati-mi;sra's guru as well as father and that T seems to have died not long after V composed his Nyaaya-ka.nikaa. The best I could do in tracing the verse is reflected in footnote 7 of that article: >yat tu "aatma-naama guror naama naamaatik.rpa.nasya ca / aayu.s-kaamo na g.rh.niiyaaj jye.s.thaapatya-kalatrayo.h //Æ iti tat kaamyam, aayu.skaama iti ;srava.naat." Nanda-pa.n.dita, Ke;sava-vaijayantii commentary on Vi.s.nu-sm.rti, p. 433. Further, the convention might have been thought of as something to be observed only as long as the guru was alive.< ashok aklujkar On 2004/12/14 02:23, "narayan prasad" <prasad_cwprs wrote: >Can anybody tell me the exact location of the following shloka from the > manusmRti ? > > Atma-nAma guror-nAma nAmAtikRpaNasya ca | > shreyas-kAmo na gRhNiiyAt jyeSThApatya-kalatrayoH || > > [ Anybody wishing his welfare should not utter the name of (1) self (2) guru > (3) great miser (4) the eldest issue (child) and (5) wife.] Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest guest Posted December 20, 2004 Report Share Posted December 20, 2004 Thanks a lot, sir, for replying to my message and providing extra information. The zloka concerned I came across in the following reference: devendranAtha zarmA (1986):"bh ASAvij~nAna kii bhUmikA", Pub: rAdhAkRSNa prakAzana, New Delhi, 7th edition, p.297. He has cited the zloka under the ch. "arthavij~nAna", section "artha-parivartana ke kAraNa" ---(4) suzrAvyatA ....(gha) andhavizvAsa. ---- Best regards. Narayan Prasad Ashok Aklujkar <aklujkar wrote: The verse, which I had heard from one of my teachers, is not in the Manu-sm.rti or any of the well-known Sm.rtis as far as I could check a few years ago. I needed to refer to it in the following article: year 2000. "The prologue and epilogue verses of Vacaspati-misra-I." Rivista degli Studi Orientali 73: 105-130. The point I was making was that the philosopher Trilocana was very probably Vaacaspati-mi;sra's guru as well as father and that T seems to have died not long after V composed his Nyaaya-ka.nikaa. The best I could do in tracing the verse is reflected in footnote 7 of that article: >yat tu "aatma-naama guror naama naamaatik.rpa.nasya ca / aayu.s-kaamo na g.rh.niiyaaj jye.s.thaapatya-kalatrayo.h //Æ iti tat kaamyam, aayu.skaama iti ;srava.naat." Nanda-pa.n.dita, Ke;sava-vaijayantii commentary on Vi.s.nu-sm.rti, p. 433. Further, the convention might have been thought of as something to be observed only as long as the guru was alive.< ashok aklujkar On 2004/12/14 02:23, "narayan prasad" <prasad_cwprs wrote: >Can anybody tell me the exact location of the following shloka from the > manusmRti ? > > Atma-nAma guror-nAma nAmAtikRpaNasya ca | > shreyas-kAmo na gRhNiiyAt jyeSThApatya-kalatrayoH || > > [ Anybody wishing his welfare should not utter the name of (1) self (2) guru > (3) great miser (4) the eldest issue (child) and (5) wife.] Win a castle for NYE with your mates and Messenger Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You are posting as a guest. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.